SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Malmqvist Magnus) srt2:(2020-2023)"

Sökning: WFRF:(Malmqvist Magnus) > (2020-2023)

  • Resultat 1-10 av 10
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  •  
2.
  • Bjork, Jonas, et al. (författare)
  • COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against severe disease from the Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 subvariants: surveillance results from southern Sweden, December 2021 to March 2022
  • 2022
  • Annan publikation (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
    • We compared vaccine effectiveness (VE) against severe COVID-19 during calendar periods from December 2021 to March 2022 when Omicron BA.1 and BA.2, respectively, were the dominating virus variants in Scania county, Sweden. We used continuous density case-control sampling matched for sex and age, and with further adjustment for differences in comorbidities and prior infection. VE remained relatively stable after the transition from BA.1 to BA.2 among people with at least three doses but decreased markedly among those with only two doses. Protection from prior infection was also lower after the transition to BA.2. These findings suggest that booster vaccination is needed to maintain sufficient protection against severe COVID-19.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was supported by Swedish Research Council (VR; grant numbers 2019-00198 and 2021-04665), Sweden's Innovation Agency (Vinnova; grant number 2021-02648) and by internal grants for thematic collaboration initiatives at Lund University held by JB and MI. FK is supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council and Governmental Funds for Clinical Research (ALF), and CB is supported by Swedish Research Council for Health, Working life and Welfare (Forte; grant number 2020-00962). The funders played no role in the design of the study, data collection or analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was obtained from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (2021-00059).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAggregated surveillance data from the present study are publicly available.https://sodrasjukvardsregionen.se/kliniskastudier/covid-vacciner-skyddseffekt/
  •  
3.
  •  
4.
  • Björk, Jonas, et al. (författare)
  • Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine in preventing COVID-19 in the working age population – first results from a cohort study in Southern Sweden
  • 2021
  • Annan publikation (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
    • Background Vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 needs to be assessed in diverse real-world population settings.Methods A cohort study of 805 741 residents in Skåne county, Southern Sweden, aged 18-64 years, of whom 26 587 received at least one dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine. Incidence rates of COVID-19 were estimated in sex- and age-adjusted analysis and stratified in two-week periods with substantial community spread of the disease.Results The estimated vaccine effectiveness in preventing infection ≥7 days after second dose was 86% (95% CI 72-94%) but only 42% (95% CI 14-63%) ≥14 days after a single dose. No difference in vaccine effectiveness was observed between females and males. Having a prior positive test was associated with 91% (95% CI 85 to 94%) effectiveness against new infection among the unvaccinated.Conclusion A satisfactory effectiveness of BNT162b2 after the second dose was suggested, but with possibly substantially lower effect before the second dose.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was supported by an internal grant for thematic collaboration initiatives at Lund University held by JB, and by Swedish Research Council (VR; grant number 2019-00198). FK is supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council and Governmental Funds for Clinical Research (ALF). The funders played no role in the design of the study, data collection or analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was obtained from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (2021-00059). As the study is register-based, individual participant consent was not necessary.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe dataset used in the present study is hosted by Scania county council, Sweden. Legal and ethical restrictions prevent public sharing of the dataset. Data can be made available for collaborations upon request to interested researchers but would generally require a new ethical permission.
  •  
5.
  • Björk, Jonas, et al. (författare)
  • High level of protection against COVID-19 after two doses of BNT162b2 vaccine in the working age population–first results from a cohort study in Southern Sweden
  • 2022
  • Ingår i: Infectious Diseases. - : Informa UK Limited. - 2374-4235 .- 2374-4243. ; 54:2, s. 128-133
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Background: Vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 needs to be assessed in diverse real-world population settings. Methods: A cohort study of 805,741 residents in Skåne county, Southern Sweden, aged 18–64 years, of whom 26,587 received at least one dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine. Incidence rates of COVID-19 were estimated in sex- and age-adjusted analysis and stratified in two-week periods with substantial community spread of the disease. Results: The estimated vaccine effectiveness in preventing infection ≥7 days after second dose was 86% (95% CI 72–94%) but only 42% (95% CI 14–63%) ≥14 days after a single dose. No difference in vaccine effectiveness was observed between females and males. Having a prior positive test was associated with 91% (95% CI 85–94%) effectiveness against new infection among the unvaccinated. Conclusion: A satisfactory effectiveness of BNT162b2 after the second dose was suggested, but with possibly substantially lower effect before the second dose.
  •  
6.
  • Björk, Jonas, et al. (författare)
  • Surveillance of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness : A real-time case-control study in southern Sweden
  • 2022
  • Ingår i: Epidemiology and Infection. - 0950-2688. ; 150
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • The extensive register infrastructure available for coronavirus disease 2019 surveillance in Scania county, Sweden, makes it possible to classify individual cases with respect to hospitalisation and disease severity, stratify on time since last dose and demographic factors, account for prior infection and extract data for population controls automatically. In the present study, we developed a case-control sampling design to surveil vaccine effectiveness (VE) in this ethnically and socioeconomically diverse population with more than 1.3 million inhabitants. The first surveillance results show that estimated VE against hospitalisation and severe disease 0-3 months after the last dose remained stable during the study period, but waned markedly 6 months after the last dose in persons aged 65 years or over.
  •  
7.
  •  
8.
  •  
9.
  •  
10.
  • Tideman, Magnus, 1959-, et al. (författare)
  • Övergången från ung till vuxen för personer med funktionsnedsättning – en kartläggning av det vetenskapliga kunskapsläget
  • 2020
  • Rapport (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Att gå från att vara ungdom till att bli vuxen kan innebära en rad förändringar, som att flytta hemifrån, börja studera eller arbeta, skapa nya relationeroch kanske träffa en partner. Men det handlar också om att möta högrekrav på att fatta egna beslut och ta ansvar för beslutens konsekvenser.Med andra ord: att etablera sig som vuxen innebär såväl möjligheter som utmaningar för unga människor. Detta gäller givetvis också för ungasom lever med olika typer och grader av funktionsnedsättning. Den här kunskapsöversikten redovisar forskningsbaserad kunskap om övergången från ungdoms- till vuxenliv för personer med funktionsnedsättning.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-10 av 10
Typ av publikation
tidskriftsartikel (7)
annan publikation (2)
rapport (1)
Typ av innehåll
refereegranskat (5)
populärvet., debatt m.m. (3)
övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt (2)
Författare/redaktör
Malmqvist, Ulf (6)
Rasmussen, Magnus (6)
Kahn, Fredrik (6)
Björk, Jonas (5)
Gren, Nina (3)
Malmqvist, Ebba (3)
visa fler...
Friberg, Johan (3)
Becker, Per (3)
Alcer, David (3)
Gabrielsson, Sara (3)
Krause, Torsten (3)
Roldin, Pontus (3)
Kritzberg, Emma (3)
Olsson, Lennart (3)
Persson, Andreas (3)
Sporre, Moa (3)
Persson, Tomas (3)
Richter, Jessika Lut ... (3)
Stroh, Emilie (3)
Dahlner, Anders (3)
Mccormick, Kes (2)
Abdelhady, Dalia (2)
Ardö, Jonas (2)
Harrie, Lars (2)
Isaxon, Christina (2)
Lindroth, Anders (2)
Busch, Henner (2)
Carton, Wim (2)
Jack, Tullia (2)
Knaggård, Åsa (2)
Ramasar, Vasna (2)
Thorén, Henrik (2)
Bergman Rosamond, An ... (2)
Maad Sasane, Sara (2)
Barmark, Mimmi (2)
Galafassi, Diego (2)
Nilsson, Lovisa (2)
Frank, Göran (2)
Hammarlund, Dan (2)
Johansson, Thomas B (2)
Nicholas, Kimberly (2)
Lopez de Lapuente Po ... (2)
Allesson, Jonas (2)
Palm, Jenny (2)
Hildingsson, Roger (2)
Oudin, Anna (2)
Isgren, Ellinor (2)
Skelton, Alasdair (2)
Koch, Max (2)
Eklund, Lina (2)
visa färre...
Lärosäte
Lunds universitet (9)
Göteborgs universitet (1)
Umeå universitet (1)
Högskolan i Halmstad (1)
Jönköping University (1)
Linnéuniversitetet (1)
Språk
Engelska (6)
Svenska (4)
Forskningsämne (UKÄ/SCB)
Medicin och hälsovetenskap (6)
Samhällsvetenskap (3)
Naturvetenskap (2)
Teknik (1)

År

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy