| 1. |
- Pini, Alessia, 1985-, et al.
(författare)
-
Test-retest reliability measures for curve data : an overview with recommendations and supplementary code.
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Sports Biomechanics. - : Routledge. - 1476-3141 .- 1752-6116. ; 21:2, s. 179-200
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of available methods for reliability investigations when the outcome of interest is a curve. Curve data, or functional data, is commonly collected in biomechanical research in order to better understand different aspects of human movement. Using recent statistical developments, curve data can be analysed in its most detailed form, as functions. However, an overview of appropriate statistical methods for assessing reliability of curve data is lacking. A review of contemporary literature of reliability measures for curve data within the fields of biomechanics and statistics identified the following methods: coefficient of multiple correlation, functional limits of agreement, measures of distance and similarity, and integrated pointwise indices (an extension of univariate reliability measures to curve data, inclusive of Pearson correlation, intraclass correlation, and standard error of measurement). These methods are briefly presented, implemented (R-code available as supplementary material) and evaluated on simulated data to highlight advantages and disadvantages of the methods. Among the identified methods, the integrated intraclass correlation and standard error of measurement are recommended. These methods are straightforward to implement, enable results over the domain, and consider variation between individuals, which the other methods partly neglect.
|
|
| 2. |
- Markström, Jonas, 1985-, et al.
(författare)
-
Atypical lower limb mechanics during weight acceptance of stair descent at different time frames after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
- 2022
-
Ingår i: American Journal of Sports Medicine. - : Sage Publications. - 0363-5465 .- 1552-3365. ; 50:8, s. 2125-2133
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture may result in poor sensorimotor knee control and, consequentially, adapted movement strategies to help maintain knee stability. Whether patients display atypical lower limb mechanics during weight acceptance of stair descent at different time frames after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is unknown.Purpose:To compare the presence of atypical lower limb mechanics during the weight acceptance phase of stair descent among athletes at early, middle, and late time frames after unilateral ACLR.Study Design:Controlled laboratory study.Methods:A total of 49 athletes with ACLR were classified into 3 groups according to time after ACLR—early (<6 months; n = 17), middle (6-18 months; n = 16), and late (>18 months; n = 16)—and compared with asymptomatic athletes (control; n = 18). Sagittal plane hip, knee, and ankle angles; angular velocities; moments; and powers were compared between the ACLR groups’ injured and noninjured legs and the control group as well as between legs within groups using functional data analysis methods.Results:All 3 ACLR groups showed greater knee flexion angles and moments than the control group for injured and noninjured legs. For the other outcomes, the early group had, compared with the control group, less hip power absorption, more knee power absorption, lower ankle plantarflexion angle, lower ankle dorsiflexion moment, and less ankle power absorption for the injured leg and more knee power absorption and higher vertical ground reaction force for the noninjured leg. In addition, the late group showed differences from the control group for the injured leg revealing more knee power absorption and lower ankle plantarflexion angle. Only the early group took a longer time than the control group to complete weight acceptance and demonstrated asymmetry for multiple outcomes.Conclusion:Athletes with different time frames after ACLR revealed atypically large knee angles and moments during weight acceptance of stair descent for both the injured and the noninjured legs. These findings may express a chronically adapted strategy to increase knee control. In contrast, atypical hip and ankle mechanics seem restricted to an early time frame after ACLR.Clinical Relevance:Rehabilitation after ACLR should include early training in controlling weight acceptance. Including a control group is essential when evaluating movement patterns after ACLR because both legs may be affected.
|
|
| 3. |
- Strong, Andrew, et al.
(författare)
-
Asymmetric loading strategies during squats following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : a longitudinal investigation throughout rehabilitation with curve analyses
- 2022
-
Ingår i: 27th annual congress of the European college of sport science. - : European College of Sport Science. - 9783981841459 ; , s. 483-483
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- INTRODUCTION: Kinetic loading asymmetries during bilateral squats have been reported following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Evidence is however limited to discrete value data extracted at specific knee angles from cross-sectional studies where side-toside strategies are presented only at group level. It is therefore unclear whether loading asymmetries occur throughout the entire squat, whether they change during rehabilitation and how they are distributed between sides.METHODS: Bilateral bodyweight squats were performed by 24 individuals (13 females) post-ACLR on three occasions: 1) Early rehab - 2.9(1.1) months; 2) Mid-rehab - 8.8 (3.1) months; 3) Return to sport (RTS) - 13.1 (3.6) months; and 29 asymptomatic controls (22 females) on one occasion. Motion capture and two force plates were used to calculate time-normalized curves of vertical ground reaction forces andhip, knee, and ankle moments. Outcomes were compared between sides and groups, and over time, using functional t-tests with p-values adjusted by the interval-wise testing procedure. Individual knee loading strategies, i.e., under-/overloading of the ACLR side, were classified when asymmetry in favour of the respective side exceeded the 95% pointwise confidence interval of controls during at least 50% of the squat.RESULTS: At Early rehab, ACLR had significantly greater (adjusted P < .05) asymmetry in knee flexion moment than controls during thetime-normalized interval of 15-100% of the eccentric phase and the entire concentric phase, as well as ankle flexion moment during 56-65% of the concentric phase. At Mid-rehab, ACLR had significantly greater asymmetry than controls for knee flexion moment during 41-72% of the eccentric phase and for ankle flexion moment during 56-69% of the concentric phase. No significant between-group differences were found at RTS. At RTS compared with Early rehab, ACLR significantly reduced asymmetry for hip (21-46%, eccentric phase), knee (27-58%, concentric phase), and ankle flexion moment (21-57%, eccentric phase). Individual asymmetry strategies for knee flexion moment atEarly rehab were mainly due to individuals underloading the ACLR side (46%) rather than overloading (4%). At RTS, however, more individuals overloaded (25%) than underloaded (17%) the ACLR side.CONCLUSION: Curve analyses revealed significant kinetic loading asymmetries throughout bilateral bodyweight squats for our ACLR group compared with controls at Early rehab and Mid-rehab, but not at RTS. Significant reductions in hip, knee and ankle flexion moment asymmetry from Early rehab to RTS showed modifications during rehabilitation. An expected underloading strategy was evident for almost half of the ACLR participants at Early rehab, but an overloading strategy was the main reason for knee flexion moment asymmetry at RTS.Loading asymmetries during bilateral tasks should thus not be assumed due to underloading of the ACLR side, but may depend on anoverloading strategy, particularly late in rehabilitation.
|
|
