| 1. |
- Harandi, Ali M, 1968, et al.
(författare)
-
Mucosal adjuvants.
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Current HIV research. - 1873-4251. ; 8:4, s. 330-5
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- The vast majority of pathogens invade the body through or establish infections in the mucosal tissues. Development of vaccines to combat mucosal infections represents a top priority. Mucosal immunization has recently attracted much interest as a means of generating protective immunity against mucosal pathogens. Conversely, only very few mucosal vaccines are presently approved for human use. The development of a broad range of mucosal vaccines will necessitate the development of safe and effective mucosal adjuvants and delivery systems. Over the past decade, a number of immunomodulatory agents, including toxin based adjuvants, Toll like receptor (TLR) mimetics and non TLR-targeting immunostimulators as well as delivery systems have shown promise for mucosal administration in experimental animals. However, their possible use in humans remains to be established. This paper attempts to provide a brief overview of the mucosal immunization and adjuvants with an emphasis on mucosal adjuvants in or close to clinic.
|
|
| 2. |
- Harandi, Ali M, 1968, et al.
(författare)
-
Vaccine adjuvants: a priority for vaccine research.
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Vaccine. - : Elsevier BV. - 1873-2518 .- 0264-410X. ; 28:12, s. 2363-2366
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The workshop on vaccine adjuvants was held in July of 2009 at the European Commission in Brussels, with the goal of identifying key scientific priorities as they pertain to the development of effective vaccines against life-threatening diseases especially those associated with poverty, including HIV/AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis as well as neglected infectious diseases. On the basis of new advances in adjuvant research and related technology as well as potential challenges and roadblocks, six priorities were identified to accelerate development of improved or novel vaccine adjuvants for human use.
|
|
| 3. |
- Jespers, Vicky, et al.
(författare)
-
Assessment of mucosal immunity to HIV-1.
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Expert review of vaccines. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1744-8395 .- 1476-0584. ; 9:4, s. 381-94
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- A key gap in the development and evaluation of HIV-1 vaccines is insufficient knowledge with regard to sampling techniques and assessment of mucosal immune responses required for early prevention and inhibition of viral dissemination. In an attempt to start bridging this gap, the EUROPRISE network of scientists working on HIV-1 vaccine and microbicide research organized a workshop with the aim to review the types of mucosal responses/biomarkers currently measured in mucosal immunology and to define how the mucosal responses/biomarkers are measured and/or the assays and sampling methods used. The Workshop addressed two critical questions: first whether, with current knowledge, it would be possible to define a consensus set of mucosal sampling methods to facilitate cross-species comparisons and ensure standardized implementation in clinical trials; second to determine the remaining challenges (technical and logistical) and their possible solutions for assessing mucosal responses to HIV-1 vaccines.
|
|
| 4. |
- Jespers, Vicky, et al.
(författare)
-
Assessment of mucosal immunity to HIV-1
- 2010
-
Ingår i: EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES. - : Expert Reviews. - 1476-0584 .- 1744-8395. ; 9:4, s. 381-394
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- A key gap in the development and evaluation of HIV-1 vaccines is insufficient knowledge with regard to sampling techniques and assessment of mucosal immune responses required for early prevention and inhibition of viral dissemination. In an attempt to start bridging this gap, the EUROPRISE network of scientists working on HIV-1 vaccine and microbicide research organized a workshop with the aim to review the types of mucosal responses/biomarkers currently measured in mucosal immunology and to define how the mucosal responses/biomarkers are measured and/or the assays and sampling methods used. The Workshop addressed two critical questions: first whether, with current knowledge, it would be possible to define a consensus set of mucosal sampling methods to facilitate cross-species comparisons and ensure standardized implementation in clinical trials; second to determine the remaining challenges (technical and logistical) and their possible solutions for assessing mucosal responses to HIV-1 vaccines.
|
|
