| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Michaëlsson, E., et al.
(författare)
-
Macrophages, but not dendritic cells, present collagen to T cells
- 1995
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Immunology. - : Wiley. - 0014-2980 .- 1521-4141. ; 25:8, s. 2234-2241
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Dendritic cells, such as epidermal Langerhans cells, play a crucial role for the antigen-specific priming of T cells. We have addressed the question whether dendritic cells present collagen, a major protein component in tissues through which dendritic cells migrate, i.e. the basement membrane, dermis, and synovial tissue. Langerhans cells, spleen cells and peritoneal macrophages were compared for antigen-presenting capacity using a panel of mouse T cell hybridomas reactive with different determinants on type II collagen, myelin basic protein, ovalbumin and pepsin. Langerhans cells did not present any of the type II collagen determinants, unless the antigen was administered as a 15-mer peptide, but did present myelin basic protein, ovalbumin and pepsin. Spleen cells and peritoneal macrophages, in contrast, presented all type II collagen determinants. This biased antigen presentation was also observed when Langerhans cells were pulsed with antigen in vivo. The inability to present type II collagen is related to the collagen sequence as such, since both native type II collagen, type II collagen alpha chains, as well as a type II collagen determinant incorporated in type I collagen, were not presented by Langerhans cells. In addition, granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor-expanded blood dendritic cells displayed the same biased antigen presentation, suggesting that the inability to present collagen is not restricted to dendritic cells localized in epidermis. B cell-deficient mice could prime a type II collagen-reactive T cell response, thus excluding B cells as obligatory antigen-presenting cells for the priming of collagen-reactive T cells. We suggest that neither Langerhans cells nor B cells, but macrophages are the primary antigen-presenting cells in the immune response towards type II collagen.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Michaëlsson, Karl, 1959-, et al.
(författare)
-
Differences in Risk Factor Patterns Between Cervical and Trochanteric Hip Fractures
- 1999
-
Ingår i: Osteoporosis International. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0937-941X .- 1433-2965. ; 10:6, s. 487-494
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The two types of hip fracture--cervical and trochanteric femoral fractures--are generally considered together in etiologic studies. However, women with a trochanteric fracture may be more osteoporotic than those with cervical hip fractures, and have higher post-fracture mortality. To explore differences in risk factor patterns between the two types of hip fracture we used data from a large population-based case-control study in Swedish women, 50-81 years of age. Data were collected by questionnaire, to which more than 80% of subjects responded. Of the cases included, 811 had had a cervical fracture and 483 a trochanteric fracture during the study period; these cases were compared with 3312 randomly selected controls. Height and hormonal factors appeared to affect the risk of the two types of hip fracture differently. For every 5 cm of current height, women with a cervical fracture had an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 1.23 (95% CI 1.15-1.32) compared with an OR of 1.06 (95% CI 0.97-1.15) for women with trochanteric fractures. Later menopausal age was protective for trochanteric fractures (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0. 91-0.99 per 2 years) but no such association was found for cervical fractures. Compared with never smokers, current smokers had an OR of 1.48 (95% CI 1.12-1.95) for trochanteric fractures and 1.22 (95% CI 0.98-1.52) for cervical fractures. Current hormone replacement therapy was similarly protective for both fracture types, but former use substantially reduced risk only for trochanteric fractures: OR 0. 55 (95% CI 0.33-0.92) compared with 1.00 (95% CI 0.71-1.39) for cervical fractures. These risk factor patterns suggest etiologic differences between the fracture types which have to be considered when planning preventive interventions.
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
