| 1. |
- Loukianov, Mikhail, et al.
(författare)
-
A History of Russian Conservatism, from the 18th Century to the End of the 20th Century
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Contemporary Russian Conservatism. Problems, Paradoxes and Perspectives. - Boston : Brill Academic Publishers. - 9789004408005 - 9789004401907 ; , s. 36-75
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This chapter provides a brief historical survey of Russian conservative ideology over the past two centuries. It does not purport to reconstruct Russian conservatism as a narrative of conceptual evolution. To be sure, each new generation of conservatives recycled ideological building blocks from the past in order to provide convincing responses to the historical challenges of the moment. However, this chapter emphasizes the importance of the contextual interpretation of conservatism, and therefore depicts conservatism as an ideology concerned primarily with the problem of change, tradition, and cultural authenticity.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Mjør, Kåre Johan, 1973-
(författare)
-
Creation and Creativity in the Philosophy of Vladimir Solov'ev
- 2016
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Tvorchestvo, creativity, is a pivotal concept in Russian philosophy, and is particularly associated with Nikolai Berdyaev and Sergei Bulgakov. This paper seeks to contribute to a broader understanding of its Begriffsgeschichte (history of the concept) by examining the role of this concept in the philosophy of Vladimir Solov'ev. Particular attention is given to his works Philosophical Principles of Integral Knowledge, where it is related to theurgy; Lectures on Godmanhood and its idea of human participation in creation; and Critique of Abstract Principles, where tvorchestvo is an aspect of knowledge and cognition.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Mjør, Kåre Johan, 1973-
(författare)
-
Eit evig Russland : Oleg Platonov, Institutt for russisk sivilisasjon og nasjonaliseringa av russisk tenking
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Nordisk Østforum. - 0801-7220 .- 1891-1773. ; 30:2, s. 98-117
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article discusses the Russian nationalist Oleg Platonov and his Institute for Russian Civilization, a project established for publishing both contemporary works and the classics of Russian intellectual history. Special attention is given to how Platonov, who is otherwise known for his extreme anti-Westernism and anti-Semitism, within the framework of this project actively disseminates not only his own idea of a unique and self-sufficient Russian civilization, but also numerous classics of Russian thought, in particular of the Slavophile current. Various Russian thinkers are presented here as the embodiment of “Russian national thought” and the expression of an alleged “ideology of the Russian people”. On the basis of this analysis, the article reviews Platonov’s contribution to contemporary Russian nationalism more generally and its tendency to make the marginal mainstream.
|
|
| 10. |
- Mjør, Kåre Johan, 1973-
(författare)
-
Metaphysics, Aesthetics, or Epistemology? : The Conceptual History of tvorchestvo in Nineteenth-Century Russian Thought
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Slavic and East European Journal. - 0037-6752 .- 2325-7687. ; 62:1 (Spring 2018), s. 4-25
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article analyzes the history of the Russian concept of tvorchestvo (“creation,” “creativity”) from its emergence and early usages in the early nineteenth century, in particular in the writings of Nikolai Nadezhdin, Nikolai Stankevich and Vissarion Belinskii, and up to and including the philosophy of Vladimir Solov’ev. While the concept later on became a key term and pivotal philosophical issue for thinkers such as Nikolai Berdiaev and Sergei Bulgakov, this article focuses on its early history, and more specifically on how it was coined in the translation of the ideas of Schelling, while subsequently becoming independent of the Schellingian origins. More specifically, while it initially was a metaphysical concept, corresponding to Schilling’s idea of “productivity” (of nature as well as of the human being), thinkers like Nadezhdin and Belinskii used it as an aesthetic concept, referring to the creative genius, while Solov’ev in turn applied it in order to emphasize the active role we play in cognition and perception (epistemology). The article demonstrates the importance of cultural transfer in the creation of a Russian philosophical discourse in the nineteenth century and expolores how processes of transfer and translation generate new philosophical issues.
|
|
