SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Munafò Marcus R.)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Munafò Marcus R.) > (2022) > Discrepancy review :

Discrepancy review : a feasibility study of a novel peer review intervention to reduce undisclosed discrepancies between registrations and publications

Thibault, Robert T. (författare)
Thompson, Jacqueline (författare)
Drax, Katie (författare)
visa fler...
Munafò, Marcus R. (författare)
Hardwicke, Tom E. (författare)
Pennington, Charlotte R. (författare)
Clark, Robbie W. A. (författare)
O'Mahony, Aoife (författare)
Nilsonne, Gustav, 1982- (författare)
Stockholms universitet,Stressforskningsinstitutet,Karolinska Institutet, Sweden; Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2022-07-27
2022
Engelska.
Ingår i: Royal Society Open Science. - : The Royal Society. - 2054-5703. ; 9:7
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Undisclosed discrepancies often exist between study registrations and their associated publications. Discrepancies can increase risk of bias, and when undisclosed, they disguise this increased risk of bias from readers. To remedy this issue, we developed an intervention called discrepancy review. We provided journals with peer reviewers specifically assigned to check for undisclosed discrepancies between registrations and manuscripts submitted to journals. We performed discrepancy review on 18 manuscripts submitted to Nicotine and Tobacco Research and three manuscripts submitted to the European Journal of Personality. We iteratively refined the discrepancy review process based on feedback from discrepancy reviewers, editors and authors. Authors addressed the majority of discrepancy reviewer comments, and there was no opposition to running a trial from authors, editors or discrepancy reviewers. Outcome measures for a trial of discrepancy review could include the presence of primary or secondary outcome discrepancies, whether publications that are not the primary report from a clinical trial registration are clearly described as such, whether registrations are permanent, and an overarching subjective assessment of the impact of discrepancies in published articles. We found that discrepancy review could feasibly be introduced as a regular practice at some journals interested in this process. A full trial of discrepancy review would be needed to evaluate its impact on reducing undisclosed discrepancies.

Ämnesord

NATURVETENSKAP  -- Annan naturvetenskap (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Other Natural Sciences (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Annan samhällsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Other Social Sciences (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

peer review
outcome switching
selective reporting
pre-registration
trial registration
meta-research

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy