| 1. |
- Näsström, Sofia, et al.
(författare)
-
At the border
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Ethics & Global Politics. - 1654-4951 .- 1654-6369.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 2. |
- Näsström, Sofia
(författare)
-
Ett alternativt synsätt på demokrati
- 2005
-
Ingår i: Tidskrift för politisk filosofi. - 1402-2710 .- 2002-3383. ; 9:2, s. 30-46
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 3. |
- Näsström, Sofia
(författare)
-
Frihet
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Politisk teori. - Malmö : Liber. - 9789147088812 ; , s. 74-93
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Näsström, Sofia
(författare)
-
Introduktion
- 2009. - 2
-
Ingår i: Texter i samtida politisk teori. - Malmö : Liber. - 9789147088607 ; , s. 63-69
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 6. |
- Näsström, Sofia
(författare)
-
Konstitution som konsten att börja om
- 2006
-
Ingår i: Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift. - 0039-0747. ; 108:4, s. 389-398
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Constitution as the Art of Beginning Anew. The negative outcome of the referenda on the European Constitution in France and the Netherlands raises challenging questions about the nature of constitution-making. How does one begin a democracy? Does it matter who writes the constitution? The present essay addresses the distinction between the constituent and the constituted power, seen through the eyes of three thinkers: Hannah Arendt, Emmanuel Sieyès and Rogers M. Smith. It looks at Arendt's notion of beginning, Sieyès's idea of the nation as the constituent power behind government, and Smith's proposal of a people constituted through political contestation.
|
|
| 7. |
- Näsström, Sofia, et al.
(författare)
-
One world, many worlds
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Ethics & Global Politics. - 1654-4951 .- 1654-6369.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 8. |
- Näsström, Sofia
(författare)
-
Representative Democracy as Tautology : Ankersmit and Lefort on Representation
- 2006
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Political Theory. - London : Sage Publications. - 1474-8851 .- 1741-2730. ; 5:3, s. 321-342
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Representative democracy is often assessed from the standpoint of direct democracy. Recently, however, many theorists have come to argue that representation forms a democratic model in its own right. The most powerful claim in this direction is to be found within two quite different strands of thinking: the aesthetic theory of Frank Ankersmit and the savage theory of Claude Lefort. In this article, I show that while Ankersmit and Lefort converge in their critique of direct rule, they provide us with two distinct models of democracy. Aesthetic democracy, I argue, in the end falls short as a democratic recuperation of representation. It reduces representation to delegation. Savage democracy proves more fruitful in this respect. It offers a representative view of politics without committing itself to the premises associated with political delegation
|
|
| 9. |
- Näsström, Sofia
(författare)
-
The Legitimacy of the People
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Political Theory. ; 35:5, s. 624-658
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 10. |
- Näsström, Sofia
(författare)
-
The Legitimacy of the People
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Political theory. - Thousand Oaks : Sage Publications. - 0090-5917 .- 1552-7476. ; 35:5, s. 624-658
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In political theory it goes without saying that the constitution of government raises a claim for legitimacy. With the constitution of the people, however, it is different. It is often dismissed as a historical question. The conviction is that since the people cannot decide on its own composition the boundaries of democracy must be determined by other factors, such as the contingent forces of history. This article critically assesses this view. It argues that like the constitution of government, the constitution of the people raises a claim for legitimacy. The failure to see this is what makes many theorists run into the arms of history. They submit the legitimacy of the people to the arbitrary and asymmetrical forces of the present.
|
|
