SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Neuman Paul) srt2:(2015-2019)"

Sökning: WFRF:(Neuman Paul) > (2015-2019)

  • Resultat 1-3 av 3
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • Bergkvist, Dan, et al. (författare)
  • Knee arthroscopies: who gets them, what does the radiologist report, and what does the surgeon find?
  • 2016
  • Ingår i: Acta Orthopaedica. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1745-3682 .- 1745-3674. ; 87:1, s. 12-16
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Background and purpose - Several randomized controlled trials have not shown any added benefit of arthroscopy over placebo surgery or physiotherapy in middle-aged patients with knee symptoms without trauma. We studied the characteristics of the knee arthroscopies performed in southern Sweden. Patients and methods - From the orthopedic surgical records from 2007-2009 in the Skåne region of Sweden (with a population of 1.2 million), we retrieved ICD-10 diagnostic codes and selected all 4,096 arthroscopies that were diagnosed peroperatively with code M23.2 (derangement of meniscus due to old tear or injury) or code M17 (knee osteoarthritis). We extracted information on cartilage and meniscus status at arthroscopy, and we also randomly sampled 502 of these patients from the regional archive of radiology and analyzed the preoperative prevalence of radiographic or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined osteoarthritis. Results - 2,165 (53%) of the 4,096 arthroscopies had the diagnostic code M23.2 or M17. In this subgroup, 1,375 cases (64%) had typical findings consistent with degenerative meniscal tear (i.e. that correspond to a degenerative meniscal tear in at least a third of all arthroscopies). Of the randomly sampled patients, the preoperative prevalence of radiological knee osteoarthritis was 46%. Interpretation - There is a discrepancy between evidence-based medicine treatment guidelines and clinical practice regarding the amount of knee arthroscopies performed in patients with symptoms of degenerative knee disease.
  •  
2.
  • Tjörnstrand, Jon, et al. (författare)
  • Osteoarthritis development related to cartilage quality-the prognostic value of dGEMRIC after anterior cruciate ligament injury
  • 2019
  • Ingår i: Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. - : Elsevier BV. - 1063-4584. ; 27:11, s. 1647-1652
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • ObjectiveRupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) increases the risk of developing osteoarthritis (OA). Delayed Gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of cartilage (dGEMRIC) investigates cartilage integrity through T1-analysis after intravenous contrast injection. A high dGEMRIC index represents good cartilage quality. The main purpose of this prospective cohort study was to investigate the prognostic value of the dGEMRIC index regarding future knee OA.Method31 patients with ACL injury (mean age 27 ± 6.7 (±SD) years, 19 males) were examined after 2 years with 1.5T dGEMRIC of femoral cartilage. Re-examination 14 years post-injury included weight-bearing knee radiographs, Lysholm and Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS).ResultsAt the 14-year follow up radiographic OA (ROA) was present in 68% and OA symptoms (SOA) in 42% of the injured knees. The dGEMRIC index of the medial compartment was lower in knees that developed medial ROA, 325 ± 68 (ms±SD) vs 376 ± 47 (51 (7–94)) (difference of means (95% confidence interval (CI))), in patients that developed symptomatic OA (SOA), 327 ± 61 vs 399 ± 42 (52 (11–93)), and poor knee function 337 ± 54 vs 381 ± 52 (48 (7–89)) compared to those that did not develop ROA, SOA or poor function. The dGEMRIC index correlated negatively with the OARSI osteophyte score in medial (r = −0.44, P = 0.01) and lateral (r = −0.38, P = 0.03) compartments.ConclusionThe associations between a low dGEMRIC index and future ROA, as well as SOA, are in agreement with previous studies and indicate that dGEMRIC has a prognostic value for future knee OA.
  •  
3.
  • Tjörnstrand, Jon, et al. (författare)
  • Poor outcome after a surgically treated chondral injury on the medial femoral condyle : early evaluation with dGEMRIC and 17-year radiographic and clinical follow-up in 16 knees
  • 2018
  • Ingår i: Acta Orthopaedica. - : Medical Journals Sweden AB. - 1745-3674 .- 1745-3682. ; 89:4, s. 431-436
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Background and purpose — The optimal treatment for traumatic cartilage injuries remains unknown. Contrast-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) evaluates cartilage quality and a low dGEMRIC index may predict radiographic osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of this study was (a) to explore the results 17 years after surgical treatment of an isolated cartilage knee injury and (b) to evaluate the predictive value of dGEMRIC. Patients and methods — 16 knees with an isolated traumatic cartilage injury of the medial femoral condyle had cartilage repair surgery either by microfracture or autologous cartilage implantation. dGEMRIC of the injured knee was performed 2 years after surgery and radiographic examinations were performed 17 years after the operation. Results — Radiographic OA was present in 12 of 16 knees. Irrespective of surgical method, the dGEMRIC index was lower in repair tissue compared with adjacent cartilage in the medial compartment, 237 ms vs. 312 ms (p < 0.001), which in turn had lower value than in the non-injured lateral cartilage, 312 ms vs. 354 ms (p < 0.008). The dGEMRIC index in the cartilage adjacent to the repair tissue correlated negatively with radiographic osteophyte score, r = –0.75 (p = 0.03). Interpretation — A traumatic cartilage injury is associated with a high prevalence of OA after 17 years. The low dGEMRIC index in the repair tissue 2 years postoperatively indicates fibrocartilage of low quality. The negative correlation between the dGEMRIC index in the adjacent cartilage and future OA suggests that the quality of the surrounding cartilage influences outcome after cartilage repair surgery.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-3 av 3

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy