| 1. |
- Neyse, Levent, et al.
(författare)
-
2D:4D Does Not Predict Economic Preferences: Evidence from a Large, Representative Sample
- 2024
-
Ingår i: SSRN Electronic Journal. - : Elsevier BV. - 1556-5068.
-
Annan publikation (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The digit ratio (2D:4D) is considered a proxy for testosterone exposure in utero, and there has been a recent surge of studies testing whether 2D:4D is associated with economic preferences. Although the results are not conclusive, previous studies have reported statistically significant correlations between 2D:4D and risk taking, altruism, positive reciprocity, negative reciprocity and trust. Many “researcher degrees of freedom” and small sample sizes are important limitations of previous studies. We present results from a pre-registered large sample study testing if 2D:4D is associated with economic preferences. Data were collected in a representative sample of adults in the German Socioeconomic Panel-Innovation Sample (SOEP-IS), in a sample of about 3,450 respondents (about 5 times larger than the previously largest study in this field). We find no statistically significant association between 2D:4D and economic preferences in the largest study to this date on the topic.
|
|
| 2. |
- Neyse, Levent, et al.
(författare)
-
Cognitive Reflection and 2D:4D: Evidence from a Large Population Sample
- 2024
-
Ingår i: SSRN Electronic Journal. - : Elsevier BV. - 1556-5068.
-
Annan publikation (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Bosch-Domènech et al. (2014) reported a negative association between 2D:4D, a suggested marker of prenatal testosterone exposure, and the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) in a sample of 623 university students. In this pre-registered study, we test if we can replicate their findings in a general population sample of over 2,500 individuals from Germany. We find no statistically significant association between 2D:4D and the CRT in any of our primary hypothesis tests, or in any of our pre-registered exploratory analyses and robustness tests. The evidence is strong (based on the 99.5% confidence intervals in all three primary hypothesis tests) against effect sizes in the hypothesized direction larger than 0.075 CRT units (0.073 of the CRT standard deviation) for a one standard deviation change in 2D:4D.
|
|
