| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Olsson, Anders, 1940-, et al.
(författare)
-
Effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin compared over 52 weeks of treatment in patients with hypercholesterolemia
- 2002
-
Ingår i: American Heart Journal. - : Elsevier BV. - 0002-8703 .- 1097-6744. ; 144:6, s. 1044-1051
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Despite the demonstrated benefits of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction in reducing the risk of coronary heart disease, many patients receiving lipid-lowering therapy fail to achieve LDL-C goals. We compared the effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin in reducing LDL-C and achieving LDL-C goals in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Methods and Results: In this 52-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial (4522IL/0026), 412 patients with LDL-C 160 to <250 mg/dL received a 5-mg dose of rosuvastatin (n = 138), a 10-mg dose of rosuvastatin (n = 134), or a 10-mg dose of atorvastatin (n = 140) for 12 weeks, during the following 40 weeks, dosages could be sequentially doubled up to 80 mg if National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel II (ATP-II) LDL-C goals were not achieved. At 12 weeks, 5- and 10-mg doses of rosuvastatin were associated with significantly greater LDL-C reductions than 10-mg doses of atorvastatin (46% and 50% vs 39%, both P < .001). At 12 weeks, both rosuvastatin dosages brought more patients to within ATP-II and European LDL-C goals than atorvastatin (86% and 89% vs 73% and 75%, and 86% vs 55%, respectively). At 52 weeks, compared with atorvastatin, both initial rosuvastatin treatment groups significantly reduced LDL-C (47% and 53% vs 44%, P < .05 and P < .001). Overall, more patients in the initial rosuvastatin 10-mg group achieved their ATP-II LDL-C goal than those in the initial atorvastatin 10-mg group (98% vs 87%), with 82% of patients treated with rosuvastatin achieving their goal at the 10-mg starting dosage without the need for titration, compared with 59% of patients treated with atorvastatin. Both treatments were well tolerated over 52 weeks. Conclusion: Compared with atorvastatin, rosuvastatin produced greater reductions in LDL-C, which may offer advantages in LDL-C goal attainment over existing lipid-lowering therapies.
|
|
| 3. |
- Ose, L, et al.
(författare)
-
Cerivastatin gender effect : Sub-analyses of results from a multinational, randomised, double-blind study
- 2000
-
Ingår i: Current Medical Research and Opinion. - 0300-7995 .- 1473-4877. ; 16:2, s. 80-87
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- We previously reported the results of a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study comparing the efficacy, and safety of cerivastatin 0.4 mg/day and cerivastatin 0.2 mg/day in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia. Exploratory analysis in this study suggested a gender difference ill the 0.4 wry group: mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) decreased by 44.4 +/- 8.9% in women, compared with a mean decrease of 37.0 +/- 0.9% in men (p < 0.046). This paper reports the results of further sub-analyses from this study. Overall in the per-protocol (PP) population. 71.5% (n = 73) of women taking cerivastatin 0.4 mg had all LDL-C decrease of > 40%, compared with 38.0% (n = 76) of men taking the same dose. In the cerivastatin 0.2 mg PP population, 34% (n = 17) of women had an LDL-C decrease of > 40%, compared with 19% (n = Ig) of men. Mean LDL-C/HDL-C ratio decreased by 43% from baseline to the end of the study in the cerivastatin 0.4 mg PP group: -41.3% in males la. -48.3% in females. In the cerivastatin 0.2 mg group, the decrease in LDL-C/HDL-C ratio from baseline to endpoint did not markedly differ between genders: -37.0% for males vs. -37.3% for females. Categorial analysis of the LDL-C/HDL-C ratio found that 90% of PP patients taking cerivastatin 0.4 mg, and 84% of PP patients taking cerivastatin 0.2 my, had a low CHD risk (defined as a LDL-C/HDL-C ratio less than or equal to 3) after 8 weeks of treatment. The 6th and 95th percentiles of the distribution of LDL-C reduction from baseline revealed that 90% of PP patients taking cerivastatin 0.4 mg had all LDL-C reduction of between 22% and 56%. The mean LDL-C reduction for this 90% subset of patients uas 40.1%. The same analysis for PP patients taking cerivastatin 0.2 my found that 90% had all LDL-C reduction of between 13% and 49%. The mean LDL-C reduction in this 90% subset of patients was 31.5%. Of the patients raking cerivastatin 0.4 mg and valid for treatment according to National Cholesterol( Education Program (NCEP) criteria, 71% (149/211) achieved NCEP targets for LDL-C at Week 16.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
