| 1. |
- Stenberg, Erik, 1979-, et al.
(författare)
-
Comparison of Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Intensive Lifestyle Modification in Patients With a BMI of 30 to Less Than 35
- 2022
-
Ingår i: JAMA Network Open. - : American Medical Association. - 2574-3805. ; 5:7
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Importance: There is a lack of studies evaluating sleeve gastrectomy compared with intensive lifestyle treatment in patients with class 1 obesity (body mass index [BMI] 30 to <35 [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared]).Objective: To compare outcomes and safety of sleeve gastrectomy compared with intensive nonoperative obesity treatment in patients with class 1 obesity.Design, Setting, and Participants: This matched, nationwide cohort study included patients with class 1 obesity who underwent a sleeve gastrectomy or intensive lifestyle treatment between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2017, and who were registered in the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry or the Itrim health database. Participants with class 1 obesity were matched 1:2 using a propensity score including age, sex, BMI, treatment year, education level, income, cardiovascular disease, and use of antibiotic drugs, antidepressants, and anxiolytics.Interventions: Sleeve gastrectomy or intensive lifestyle treatment.Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included weight loss after intervention, changes in metabolic comorbidities, substance use disorders, self-harm, and major cardiovascular events retrieved from the National Patient Register, Prescribed Drug Register, and Cause of Death Register as well as the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry and the Itrim health database. Data were analyzed from December 1, 2021 until May 31, 2022.Results: The study included 1216 surgery patients and 2432 lifestyle participants with similar mean (SD) BMI (32.8 [1.4] vs 32.9 [1.4]), mean (SD) age (42.4 [9.7] vs 42.6 [12.7] years), and sex (1091 [89.7%] vs 2191 [90.1%] women). Surgery patients had greater 1-year weight loss compared with controls (22.9 kg vs 11.9 kg; mean difference, 10.7 kg; 95% CI, 10.0-11.5 kg; P < .001). Over a median follow-up of 5.1 years (IQR, 3.9-6.2 years), surgery patients had a lower risk of incident use of diabetes drugs (59.7 vs 100.4 events per 10 000 person-years; hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39-0.92; P = .02) and greater 2-year diabetes drug remission (48.4% vs 22.0%; risk difference 26.4%; 95% CI, 11.7%-41.0%; P < .001), but higher risk for substance use disorder (94 vs 50 events per 10 000 person-years; HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.30-2.67; P < .001) and self-harm (45 vs 25 events per 10 000 person-years; HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.09-3.01; P = .02). No between-group difference in occurrence of major cardiovascular events was observed (23.4 vs 24.8 events per 10 000 person-years; HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.49-1.91; P = .92).Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, compared with intensive nonoperative obesity treatment, sleeve gastrectomy in patients with class 1 obesity was associated with greater weight loss, diabetes prevention, and diabetes remission but a higher incidence of substance use disorder and self-harm.
|
|
| 2. |
- de Vries, Claire E. E., et al.
(författare)
-
Outcomes of the first global multidisciplinary consensus meeting including persons living with obesity to standardize patient-reported outcome measurement in obesity treatment research
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Obesity Reviews. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 1467-7881 .- 1467-789X. ; 23:8
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Quality of life is a key outcome that is not rigorously measured in obesity treatment research due to the lack of standardization of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and PRO measures (PROMs). The S.Q.O.T. initiative was founded to Standardize Quality of life measurement in Obesity Treatment. A first face-to-face, international, multidisciplinary consensus meeting was conducted to identify the key PROs and preferred PROMs for obesity treatment research. It comprised of 35 people living with obesity (PLWO) and healthcare providers (HCPs). Formal presentations, nominal group techniques, and modified Delphi exercises were used to develop consensus-based recommendations. The following eight PROs were considered important: self-esteem, physical health/functioning, mental/psychological health, social health, eating, stigma, body image, and excess skin. Self-esteem was considered the most important PRO, particularly for PLWO, while physical health was perceived to be the most important among HCPs. For each PRO, one or more PROMs were selected, except for stigma. This consensus meeting was a first step toward standardizing PROs (what to measure) and PROMs (how to measure) in obesity treatment research. It provides an overview of the key PROs and a first selection of the PROMs that can be used to evaluate these PROs.
|
|
| 3. |
- Ighani Arani, Perna, 1989-, et al.
(författare)
-
Pain, Function, and Satisfaction After Total Knee Arthroplasty, with or Without Bariatric Surgery
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Obesity Surgery. - : Springer. - 0960-8923 .- 1708-0428. ; 32:4, s. 1164-1169
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: The impact of obesity on patient-reported outcome (PRO) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery has demonstrated varying results. We evaluated knee pain, Activity in Daily Life function (ADL), and satisfaction after TKA surgery in patients with and without prior bariatric surgery (BS).METHODS: Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg) and the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register (SKAR) were used to identify patients operated on with primary TKA for osteoarthritis (OA) between 2009 and 2019 that had a BS within 2 years before the TKA (BS group). These patients were compared to patients with TKA without prior BS (no BS group). The patients filled in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) preoperatively and one year postoperatively as well as satisfaction with the surgery one year postoperatively. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate 1-year postoperative KOOS pain and ADL function between the 2 groups. Adjustments were made for sex, age, and preoperative KOOS pain and ADL function respectively.RESULTS: Forty-four patients were included in the BS group and 3,525 patients in the no BS group. We found no statistically or clinically significant difference in one-year postoperative KOOS pain and ADL function between the BS group and the no BS group. The majority of the patients in both groups were classified as satisfied or very satisfied one year postoperatively to the TKA.CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that patients without BS prior to the TKA gain similar 1-year outcome in pain, ADL function and satisfaction as patients with prior BS.
|
|
| 4. |
- Jans, Anders, 1981-, et al.
(författare)
-
Factors affecting relapse of type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery in Sweden 2007-2015 : a registry-based cohort study
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. - : Elsevier. - 1550-7289 .- 1878-7533. ; 18:3, s. 305-312
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Although a large proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) who have undergone metabolic surgery experience initial remission some patients later suffer from relapse. While several factors associated with T2D remission are known, less is known about factors that may influence relapse.OBJECTIVES: To identify possible risk factors for T2D relapse in patients who initially experienced remission.SETTING: Nationwide, registry-based study.METHODS: We conducted a nationwide registry-based retrospective cohort study including all adult patients with T2D and body mass index ≥35 kg/m2 who received primary metabolic surgery with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in Sweden between 2007 and 2015. Patients who achieved complete diabetes remission 2 years after surgery was identified and analyzed. Main outcome measure was postoperative relapse of T2D, defined as reintroduction of diabetes medication.RESULTS: In total, 2090 patients in complete remission at 2 years after surgery were followed for a median of 5.9 years (interquartile range [IQR] 4.3-7.2 years) after surgery. The cumulative T2D relapse rate was 20.1%. Duration of diabetes (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.14; P < .001), preoperative glycosylated hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) level (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02; P = .013), and preoperative insulin treatment (HR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.84-3.90; P < .001) were associated with higher rates for relapse, while postoperative weight loss (HR, .93; 95% CI, .91-.96; P < .001), and male sex (HR, .65; 95% CI, .46-.91; P = .012) were associated with lower rates.CONCLUSION: Longer duration of T2D, higher preoperative HbA1C level, less postoperative weight loss, female sex, and insulin treatment prior to surgery are risk factors for T2D relapse after initial remission.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Johansson, Kari, et al.
(författare)
-
Risk of pre-eclampsia after gastric bypass : a matched cohort study
- 2022
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. - : Blackwell Publishing. - 1470-0328 .- 1471-0528. ; 129:3, s. 461-471
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether gastric bypass before pregnancy is associated with reduced risk of preeclampsia.DESIGN: Nationwide matched cohort study.SETTING: Swedish national health care.POPULATION: =2766:2766) on pre-surgery/early-pregnancy BMI, diabetes status (pre-surgery/pre-conception), maternal age, early-pregnancy smoking status, educational level, height, country of birth, delivery year and history of preeclampsia.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preeclampsia categorised into any, preterm onset (<37+0 weeks), and term onset (≥37+0 weeks).RESULTS: (39kg). Post-gastric bypass pregnancies had lower risk of preeclampsia compared to pre-surgery BMI-matched controls (1.7 vs. 9.7 per 100 pregnancies; hazard ratio [HR] 0.21, 95%CI 0.15-0.28) and early-pregnancy BMI-matched controls (1.9 vs. 5.0 per 100 pregnancies; HR 0.44, 95%CI 0.33-0.60). Although relative risks for preeclampsia for post-gastric bypass pregnancies vs. pre-surgery matched controls was similar, absolute risk differences were significantly greater for nulliparous (RD -13.6 per 100 pregnancies, 95%CI -16.1 to -11.2) vs. parous women (RD -4.4 per 100 pregnancies, 95%CI -5.7 to -3.1).CONCLUSION: We found that gastric bypass was associated with lower risk of preeclampsia, with the largest absolute risk reduction among nulliparous women.
|
|
