| 1. |
- Boccalini, Cecilia, et al.
(författare)
-
Early-Phase 18F-Florbetapir and 18F-Flutemetamol Images as Proxies of Brain Metabolism in a Memory Clinic Setting
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Journal of Nuclear Medicine. - : The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. - 0161-5505 .- 1535-5667 .- 2159-662X. ; 64:2, s. 266-273
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Alzheimer disease (AD) neuropathologic changes are 6-amyloid (A6) deposition, pathologic tau, and neurodegeneration. Dual-phase amy-loid PET might be able to evaluate A6 deposition and neurodegenera-tion with a single tracer injection. Early-phase amyloid PET scans provide a proxy for cerebral perfusion, which has shown good correla-tions with neural dysfunction measured through metabolic consump-tion, whereas the late frames depict amyloid distribution. Our study aimed to assess the comparability between early-phase amyloid PET scans and 18F-FDG PET brain topography at the individual level and their ability to discriminate patients. Methods: One hundred sixty-six subjects evaluated at the Geneva Memory Center, ranging from no cognitive impairment to mild cognitive impairment and dementia, underwent early-phase amyloid PET-using either 18F-florbetapir (eFBP) (n = 94) or 18F-flutemetamol (eFMM) (n = 72)-and 18F-FDG PET. A6 status was assessed. SUV ratios (SUVRs) were extracted to evaluate the correlation of eFBP/eFMM and their respective 18F-FDG PET scans. The single-subject procedure was applied to investigate hypometabolism and hypoperfusion maps and their spatial overlap by the Dice coefficient. Receiver-operating-characteristic analyses were performed to compare the discriminative power of eFBP/eFMM and 18F-FDG PET SUVR in AD-related meta-regions of interest between A6-negative healthy controls and cases in the AD continuum. Results: Positive correlations were found between eFBP/eFMM and 18F-FDG PET SUVR independently of A6 status and A6 radiotracer (R> 0.72, P< 0.001). eFBP/eFMM single-subject analysis revealed clusters of significant hypoperfusion with good correspondence to hypometabo-lism topographies, independently of the underlying neurodegenerative patterns. Both eFBP/eFMM and 18F-FDG PET SUVR significantly dis-criminated AD patients from controls in the AD-related meta-regions of interest (eFBP area under the curve [AUC], 0.888; eFMM AUC, 0.801), with 18F-FDG PET performing slightly better, although not sig-nificantly (all P values higher than 0.05), than others (18F-FDG AUC, 0.915 and 0.832 for subjects evaluated with eFBP and eFMM, respec-tively). Conclusion: The distribution of perfusion was comparable to that of metabolism at the single-subject level by parametric analysis, particularly in the presence of a high neurodegeneration burden. Our findings indicate that eFBP and eFMM imaging can replace 18F-FDG PET imaging, as they reveal typical neurodegenerative patterns or allow exclusion of the presence of neurodegeneration. The findings show cost-saving capacities of amyloid PET and support routine use of the modality for individual classification in clinical practice.
|
|
| 2. |
- Sala, Arianna, et al.
(författare)
-
Brain connectomics : time for a molecular imaging perspective?
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Trends in Cognitive Sciences. - : Elsevier BV. - 1364-6613 .- 1879-307X. ; 27:4, s. 353-366
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- In the past two decades brain connectomics has evolved into a major concept in neuroscience. However, the current perspective on brain connectivity and how it underpins brain function relies mainly on the hemodynamic signal of functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Molecular imaging provides unique information inaccessible to MRI-based and electrophysiological techniques. Thus, positron emission tomography (PET) has been successfully applied to measure neural activity, neurotransmission, and proteinopathies in normal and pathological cognition. Here, we position molecular imaging within the brain connectivity framework from the perspective of timeliness, validity, reproducibility, and resolution. We encourage the neuroscientific community to take an integrative approach whereby MRI-based, electrophysiological techniques, and molecular imaging contribute to our understanding of the brain connectome.
|
|
