| 1. |
- Graziani, F., et al.
(författare)
-
Oral Care and Quality Evaluation: A Multicentric Study on Periodontal Treatment
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry. - 1602-1622. ; 18:2, s. 363-371
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose: No information is available on the perception of the quality of care in patients treated for periodontitis. The purpose of this article was to assess how periodontitis-affected patients perceive the quality of periodontal treatment (PT) and to measure the factors which may influence it. Materials and Methods: 306 subjects who completed PT were invited to participate. Questionnaires and visual analogic scales (VAS) evaluating perception of quality of care, symptoms, and oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL) were handed out. Oral and periodontal indicators were collected before and after treatment. The impact of different factors on perception of quality was assessed with a regression model. Results: Quality evaluation was high yet unrelated for both patients and clinicians (p = 0.983). Quality was negatively influenced by the number of residual oral infections (p < 0.001), patient's age (p = 0.07) and presence of residual pain at completion of PT (p = 0.02). Professionalism, kindness of the staff and communication skills were the characteristics mostly appreciated. The OHRQoL was influenced by the number of residual teeth (p < 0.001), increasing age of patients (p = 0.08), number of residual infections (p < 0.01) and pain (p = 0.04). Conclusions: Patients' quality perception appeared to be influenced by clinical and emotional aspects. Oral care providers should be aware of the impact of non-clinical factors in patients' appreciation of quality of treatment.
|
|
| 2. |
- Jenner, J., et al.
(författare)
-
Pre- and postoperative left atrial and ventricular volumetric and deformation analyses in severe aortic regurgitation
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Cardiovascular Ultrasound. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1476-7120. ; 19:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background The impact of volume overload due to aortic regurgitation (AR) on systolic and diastolic left ventricular (LV) indices and left atrial remodeling is unclear. We assessed the structural and functional effects of severe AR on LV and left atrium before and after aortic valve replacement. Methods Patients with severe AR scheduled for aortic valve replacement (n = 65) underwent two- and three-dimensional echocardiography, including left atrial strain imaging, before and 1 year after surgery. A control group was selected, and comprised patients undergoing surgery for thoracic aortic aneurysm without aortic valve replacement (n = 20). Logistic regression analysis was used to assess predictors of impaired left ventricular functional and structural recovery, defined as a composite variable of diastolic dysfunction grade >= 2, EF < 50%, or left ventricular end-diastolic volume index above the gender-specific normal range. Results Diastolic dysfunction was present in 32% of patients with AR at baseline. Diastolic LV function indices and left atrial strain improved, and both left atrial and LV volumes decreased in the AR group following aortic valve replacement. Preoperative left atrial strain during the conduit phase added to left ventricular end-systolic volume index for the prediction of impaired LV functional and structural recovery after aortic valve replacement (model p < 0.001, accuracy 70%; addition of left atrial strain during the conduit phase to end-systolic volume index p = 0.006). Conclusions One-third of patients with severe AR had signs of diastolic dysfunction. Aortic valve surgery reduced LV and left atrial volumes and improved diastolic indices. Left atrial strain during the conduit phase added to the well-established left ventricular end-diastolic dimension for the prediction of impaired left ventricular functional and structural recovery at follow-up. However, long-term follow-up studies with hard endpoints are needed to assess the value of left atrial strain as predictor of myocardial recovery in aortic regurgitation.
|
|
| 3. |
- Olsson, A., et al.
(författare)
-
HRQoL and psychosocial aspects of burden on caregivers to children with moderate or severe von Willebrand disease
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Haemophilia. - 1351-8216. ; 29:4, s. 1056-1062
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- IntroductionVon Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most widespread congenital bleeding disorder. Caregivers are highly involved in its treatment, and from the time of the child's bleeding diagnosis, they face new demands such as recognition of bleeds and treatment options. AimThe aim of this study was to assess Health related quality of life (HRQoL) in caregivers of children with moderate and severe VWD in Sweden, and to describe the impact of psychosocial aspects on the burden. MethodsA multicentre, cross-sectional study. The Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) was used to assess HRQoL. Caregiver burden was measured using The HEMOphilia associated Caregiver Burden scale (HEMOCAB). Children ' s clinical data were collected from the Swedish national registry for bleeding disorders. ResultsSeventy caregivers of children with moderate or severe VWD were included. Caregivers of children with moderate VWD scored significantly lower in the mental health domains on SF-36, compared to matched normative data. Psychosocial aspects that significantly impacted the caregiver burden negatively measured by HEMOCAB total score were: if the caregiver reported that VWD affected their life in general (p = .001), if the child was absent from preschool/school >= 2 day/12 months due to VWD (p = .002) or that VWD had a financial impact on the family (p = .001). ConclusionThis study contributes to knowledge about caregivers' HRQoL and highlights the situation of caregivers of children with moderate VWD. Furthermore, the caregiver burden was negatively affected by psychosocial aspects. Clinical follow-ups should include assessment of psychosocial aspects to identify caregivers that are at risk of high burden.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
