| 1. |
- Ranjan, R., et al.
(författare)
-
Age of onset of cerebral venous thrombosis: the BEAST study
- 2023
-
Ingår i: European Stroke Journal. - : SAGE Publications. - 2396-9873 .- 2396-9881. ; 8:1, s. 344-350
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is an uncommon cause of stroke in young adults. We aimed to determine the impact of age, gender and risk factors (including sex-specific) on CVT onset. Methods: We used data from the BEAST (Biorepository to Establish the Aetiology of Sinovenous Thrombosis), a multicentre multinational prospective observational study on CVT. Composite factors analysis (CFA) was performed to determine the impact on the age of CVT onset in males and females. Results: A total of 1309 CVT patients (75.3% females) aged > 18 years were recruited. The overall median (IQR-interquartile range) age for males and females was 46 (35-58) years and 37 (28-47) years (p < 0.001), respectively. However, the presence of antibiotic-requiring sepsis (p = 0.03, 95% CI 27-47 years) among males and gender-specific risk factors like pregnancy (p < 0.001, 95% CI 29-34 years), puerperium (p < 0.001, 95% CI 26-34 years) and oral contraceptive use (p < 0.001, 95% CI 33-36 years) were significantly associated with earlier onset of CVT among females. CFA demonstrated a significantly earlier onset of CVT in females, similar to 12 years younger, in those with multiple (> 1) compared to '0' risk factors (p < 0.001, 95% CI 32-35 years). Conclusions: Women suffer CVT 9 years earlier in comparison to men. Female patients with multiple (> 1) risk factors suffer CVT similar to 12 years earlier compared to those with no identifiable risk factors.
|
|
| 2. |
- Le Grand, Q., et al.
(författare)
-
Genetic Insights on the Relation of Vascular Risk Factors and Cervical Artery Dissection
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. - 0735-1097. ; 82:14, s. 1411-1423
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND The association between vascular risk factors and cervical artery dissections (CeADs), a leading cause of ischemic stroke (IS) in the young, remains controversial. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to explore the causal relation of vascular risk factors with CeAD risk and recurrence and compare it to their relation with non-CeAD IS. METHODS This study used 2-sample Mendelian randomization analyses to explore the association of blood pressure (BP), lipid levels, type 2 diabetes, waist-to-hip ratio, smoking, and body mass index with CeAD and non-CeAD IS. To simulate effects of the most frequently used BP-lowering drugs, this study constructed genetic proxies and tested their association with CeAD and non-CeAD IS. In analyses among patients with CeAD, the investigators studied the association between weighted genetic risk scores of vascular risk factors and the risk of multiple or early recurrent dissections. RESULTS Genetically determined higher systolic BP (OR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.32-1.72) and diastolic BP (OR: 2.40; 95% CI: 1.92-3.00) increased the risk of CeAD (P < 0.0001). Genetically determined higher body mass index was inconsistently associated with a lower risk of CeAD. Genetic proxies for f3-blocker effects were associated with a lower risk of CeAD (OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.50-0.85), whereas calcium-channel blockers were associated with a lower risk of non-CeAD IS (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.63-0.90). Weighted genetic risk scores for systolic BP and diastolic BP were associated with an increased risk of multiple or early recurrent CeAD. CONCLUSIONS These results are supportive of a causal association between higher BP and increased CeAD risk and recurrence and provide genetic evidence for lower CeAD risk under f3-blockers. This may inform secondary prevention strategies and trial design for CeAD. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2023;82:1411-1423) <(c)> 2023 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
|
|
| 3. |
- Traenka, C., et al.
(författare)
-
Recanalization Therapies for Large Vessel Occlusion Due to Cervical Artery Dissection: A Cohort Study of the EVA-TRISP Collaboration
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Journal of Stroke. - 2287-6391. ; 25:2
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and Purpose This study aimed to investigate the effect of endovascular treatment (EVT, with or without intravenous thrombolysis [IVT]) versus IVT alone on outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and intracranial large vessel occlusion (LVO) attributable to cervical artery dissection (CeAD).Methods This multinational cohort study was conducted based on prospectively collected data from the EVA-TRISP (EndoVAscular treatment and ThRombolysis for Ischemic Stroke Patients) collaboration. Consecutive patients (2015-2019) with AIS-LVO attributable to CeAD treated with EVT and/or IVT were included. Primary outcome measures were (1) favorable 3-month outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) and (2) complete recanalization (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scale 2b/3). Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (OR [95% CI]) from logistic regression models were calculated (unadjusted, adjusted). Secondary analyses were performed in the patients with LVO in the anterior circulation (LVOant) including propensity score matching.Results Among 290 patients, 222 (76.6%) had EVT and 68 (23.4%) IVT alone. EVT-treated patients had more severe strokes (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, median [interquartile range]: 14 [10-19] vs. 4 [2-7], P<0.001). The frequency of favorable 3-month outcome did not differ significantly between both groups (EVT: 64.0% vs. IVT: 86.8%; ORadjusted 0.56 [0.24-1.32]). EVT was associated with higher rates of recanalization (80.5% vs. 40.7%; ORadjusted 8.85 [4.28-18.29]) compared to IVT. All secondary analyses showed higher recanalization rates in the EVT-group, which however never translated into better functional outcome rates compared to the IVT-group.Conclusion We observed no signal of superiority of EVT over IVT regarding functional outcome in CeAD-patients with AIS and LVO despite higher rates of complete recanalization with EVT. Whether pathophysiological CeAD-characteristics or their younger age might explain this observation deserves further research.
|
|
| 4. |
- Marto, João Pedro, et al.
(författare)
-
Safety and Outcome of Revascularization Treatment in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and COVID-19: The Global COVID-19 Stroke Registry.
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Neurology. - 1526-632X. ; 100:7
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- COVID-19-related inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and coagulopathy may increase the bleeding risk and lower the efficacy of revascularization treatments in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We aimed to evaluate the safety and outcomes of revascularization treatments in patients with AIS and COVID-19.This was a retrospective multicenter cohort study of consecutive patients with AIS receiving intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or endovascular treatment (EVT) between March 2020 and June 2021 tested for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. With a doubly robust model combining propensity score weighting and multivariate regression, we studied the association of COVID-19 with intracranial bleeding complications and clinical outcomes. Subgroup analyses were performed according to treatment groups (IVT-only and EVT).Of a total of 15,128 included patients from 105 centers, 853 (5.6%) were diagnosed with COVID-19; of those, 5,848 (38.7%) patients received IVT-only and 9,280 (61.3%) EVT (with or without IVT). Patients with COVID-19 had a higher rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) (adjusted OR 1.53; 95% CI 1.16-2.01), symptomatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SSAH) (OR 1.80; 95% CI 1.20-2.69), SICH and/or SSAH combined (OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.23-1.99), 24-hour mortality (OR 2.47; 95% CI 1.58-3.86), and 3-month mortality (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.52-2.33). Patients with COVID-19 also had an unfavorable shift in the distribution of the modified Rankin score at 3 months (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.26-1.60).Patients with AIS and COVID-19 showed higher rates of intracranial bleeding complications and worse clinical outcomes after revascularization treatments than contemporaneous non-COVID-19 patients receiving treatment. Current available data do not allow direct conclusions to be drawn on the effectiveness of revascularization treatments in patients with COVID-19 or to establish different treatment recommendations in this subgroup of patients with ischemic stroke. Our findings can be taken into consideration for treatment decisions, patient monitoring, and establishing prognosis.The study was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04895462.
|
|
