| 1. |
- Lind, Marcus, 1976, et al.
(författare)
-
Glycemic control and excess mortality in type 1 diabetes
- 2014
-
Ingår i: New England Journal of Medicine. - 0028-4793 .- 1533-4406. ; 371:21, s. 1972-1982
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Copyright © 2014 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. BACKGROUND: The excess risk of death from any cause and of death from cardiovascular causes is unknown among patients with type 1 diabetes and various levels of glycemic control. We conducted a registry-based observational study to determine the excess risk of death according to the level of glycemic control in a Swedish population of patients with diabetes. METHODS: We included in our study patients with type 1 diabetes registered in the Swedish National Diabetes Register after January 1, 1998. For each patient, five controls were randomly selected from the general population and matched according to age, sex, and county. Patients and controls were followed until December 31, 2011, through the Swedish Register for Cause-Specific Mortality. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients with diabetes and the controls at baseline was 35.8 and 35.7 years, respectively, and 45.1% of the participants in each group were women. The mean follow-up in the diabetes and control groups was 8.0 and 8.3 years, respectively. Overall, 2701 of 33,915 patients with diabetes (8.0%) died, as compared with 4835 of 169,249 controls (2.9%) (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.06 to 4.04); the corresponding rates of death from cardiovascular causes were 2.7% and 0.9% (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.60; 95% CI, 3.47 to 6.10). The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios for death from any cause according to the glycated hemoglobin level for patients with diabetes as compared with controls were 2.36 (95% CI, 1.97 to 2.83) for a glycated hemoglobin level of 6.9% or lower (≤52 mmol per mole), 2.38 (95% CI, 2.02 to 2.80) for a level of 7.0 to 7.8% (53 to 62 mmol per mole), 3.11 (95% CI, 2.66 to 3.62) for a level of 7.9 to 8.7% (63 to 72 mmol per mole), 3.65 (95% CI, 3.11 to 4.30) for a level of 8.8 to 9.6% (73 to 82 mmol per mole), and 8.51 (95% CI, 7.24 to 10.01) for a level of 9.7% or higher (≥83 mmol per mole). Corresponding hazard ratios for death from cardiovascular causes were 2.92 (95% CI, 2.07 to 4.13), 3.39 (95% CI, 2.49 to 4.61), 4.44 (95% CI, 3.32 to 5.96), 5.35 (95% CI, 3.94 to 7.26), and 10.46 (95% CI, 7.62 to 14.37). CONCLUSIONS: In our registry-based observational study, patients with type 1 diabetes and a glycated hemoglobin level of 6.9% or lower had a risk of death from any cause or from cardiovascular causes that was twice as high as the risk for matched controls.
|
|
| 2. |
- Lind, Marcus, 1976, et al.
(författare)
-
Changes in HbA(1c) and frequency of measuring HbA(1c) and adjusting glucose-lowering medications in the 10 years following diagnosis of type 2 diabetes: a population-based study in the UK
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Diabetologia. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0012-186X .- 1432-0428. ; 57:8, s. 1586-1594
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aim/hypothesis The aim of this work was to study levels of HbA(1c) and patterns of adjusting glucose-lowering drugs in patients with impaired glycaemic control over 10 years after diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. Methods We studied 4,529 individuals in The Health Improvement Network Database newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in the year 2000. Results From 6 months to 10 years after diagnosis, the HbA(1c) increased from 7.04% (53.4 mmol/mol) to 7.49% (58.3 mmol/mol) (average annual change: 0.047% [0.51 mmol/mol]). The greatest annual change occurred between 6 months and 2 years (0.21% [2.30 mmol/mol] increase per year, p < 0.001), followed by the 2-5 year time period (0.033% [0.36 mmol/mol] increase per year, p < 0.001). No significant increase in HbA(1c) occurred between 5 and 10 years (p = 0.20). In multivariable analyses, patients who were younger (p < 0.001), with higher BMI (p = 0.033) and who were current insulin users (p = 0.024) at diagnosis had greater increases in HbA(1c) between 6 months and 2 years. For individuals with HbA(1c) above 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) the mean time to next measurement of HbA(1c) was 0.53 years and increase in doses or changes to other glucose-lowering medications were performed in 26% of cases. Conclusions/interpretation HbA(1c) increases by approximately 0.5% (5 mmol/mol) over 10 years after diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, with the main increase appearing in the first years after diagnosis. More frequent monitoring of HbA(1c) and adjustments of glucose-lowering drugs may be essential to prevent the decline.
|
|
| 3. |
- Anderson, J., et al.
(författare)
-
Effect on glycemic control by short- and long-term use of continuous glucose monitoring in clinical practice
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Journal of diabetes science and technology. - : SAGE Publications. - 1932-2968. ; 5:6, s. 1472-9
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: In Sweden, patients with diabetes mellitus frequently receive short-term (<3 months) continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to study glucose patterns or long-term CGM to treat poor glycemic control or severe hypoglycemia. The effects of CGM on glycemic control in clinical practice in relation to indication and duration of use has not been completely studied. METHODS: Patients with diabetes, among which 99% were diagnosed as type 1, receiving CGM at 10 outpatient clinics in Sweden were studied retrospectively. Long-term use of CGM was defined as >/= 3 months use of CGM and short-term as <3 months. A control group matched on start date and date of latest value 3 months after the start was selected for both long- and short-term groups. RESULTS: In 34 long-term users of CGM, over a mean follow-up of 1.1 years, the adjusted mean difference of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) compared with controls (n = 408) was -0.76 (95% confidence interval -1.17; -0.33, p < .001). Long-term users with indications for high HbA1c (n = 15) had a reduction of 1.2% in HbA1c from 10.1 to 8.9% (p = .003), whereas patients with hypoglycemia as their indication (n = 16) decreased by 0.3% (p = .17). Nonsevere hypoglycemic events decreased in long-term users within the same follow-up period (p = .004). Short-term users showed no statistically significant improvement in HbA1c compared with controls at 1.1 years (n = 41), p = .85 or at 2.6 years (n = 43), p = .19. CONCLUSION: Long-term CGM use was associated with improved glycemic control in clinical practice and a reduction in nonsevere hypoglycemic events, whereas short-term use had no effect on HbA1c. The effect on glycemic control varied by indication.
|
|
| 4. |
- Carlsson, Britt-Marie, et al.
(författare)
-
Insulin Pump-Long-Term Effects on Glycemic Control: An Observational Study at 10 Diabetes Clinics in Sweden
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. - : Mary Ann Liebert Inc. - 1520-9156 .- 1557-8593. ; 15:4, s. 302-307
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aim: This study examined long-term effects of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in clinical practice on glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes. Subjects and Methods: We evaluated all type 1 diabetes patients at 10 diabetes outpatient clinics in Sweden who had been treated with CSII for at least 5.5 years and had valid glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) data before starting pump use and at 5 years±6 months. Controls treated with multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) over a time-matched period were also evaluated. Results: There were 331 patients treated with CSII at least 5.5 years at the 10 clinics. Of these, 272 (82%) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Patients treated with CSII were younger than those treated with MDI (mean age, 38.6 vs. 45.6 years; P<0.001), more were women (56% vs. 43%; P<0.001), and diabetes duration was shorter (mean, 15.1 years vs. 20.1 years; P<0.001). After adjusting for variables differing at baseline and influencing the change in HbA1c over the study period, the reduction in HbA1c remained statistically significant at 5 years and was estimated to be 0.20% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07–0.32) (2.17mmol/mol [95% CI 0.81–3.53]) (P=0.002). The corresponding adjusted reduction at years 1 and 2 was 0.42% (95% CI 0.31–0.53) (4.59mmol/mol [95% CI 3.41–5.77]) (P<0.001) and 0.43% (95% CI 0.31–0.55) (4.71mmol/mol [95% CI 3.38–6.04]) (P<0.001), respectively. The effect of insulin pump use versus controls on HbA1c decreased significantly with time (P<0.001). Conclusions: Use of CSII in clinical practice in Sweden is associated with an approximately 0.2% (2mmol/mol) reduction in HbA1c after 5 years.
|
|
| 5. |
- Lind, Marcus, 1976, et al.
(författare)
-
The Association between HbA1c, Fasting Glucose, 1-Hour Glucose and 2-Hour Glucose during an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test and Cardiovascular Disease in Individuals with Elevated Risk for Diabetes
- 2014
-
Ingår i: PLoS ONE. - : Public Library of Science (PLoS). - 1932-6203. ; 9:10
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To determine the association between HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 1-hour (1 hPG) and 2-hour (2 hPG) glucose after an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and cardiovascular disease in individuals with elevated risk for diabetes. Design: We studied the relationship between baseline, updated mean and updated (last) value of HbA1c, FPG, 1 hPG and 2 hPG after an oral 75 g glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and acute CVD events in 504 individuals with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) at baseline enrolled in the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Participants: 504 individuals with IGT were followed with yearly evaluations with OGTT, FPG and HbA1c. Results: Over a median follow-up of 9.0 years 34 (6.7%) participants had a CVD event, which increased to 52 (10.3%) over a median follow-up of 13.0 years when including events that occurred among participants following a diagnosis of diabetes. Updated mean HbA1c, 1 hPG and 2 hPG, HR per 1 unit SD of 1.57 (95% CI 1.16 to 2.11), p = 0.0032, 1.51 (1.03 to 2.23), p = 0.036 and 1.60 (1.10 to 2.34), p = 0.014, respectively, but not FPG (p = 0.11), were related to CVD. In analyses of the last value prior to the CVD event the same three glycaemic measurements were associated with the CVD events, with HRs per 1 unit SD of 1.45 (1.06 to 1.98), p = 0.020, 1.55 (1.04 to 2.29), p = 0.030 and 2.19 (1.51 to 3.18), p < 0.0001, respectively but only 2 hPG remained significant in pairwise comparisons. Including the follow-up period after diabetes onset updated 2 hPG (p = 0.003) but not updated mean HbA1c (p = 0.08) was related to CVD. Conclusions and Relevance: Current 2 hPG level in people with IGT is associated with increased risk of CVD. This supports its use in screening for prediabetes and monitoring glycaemic levels of people with prediabetes.
|
|
| 6. |
- Matuleviciene, Viktorija, et al.
(författare)
-
A Clinical Trial of the Accuracy and Treatment Experience of the Dexcom G4 Sensor (Dexcom G4 System) and Enlite Sensor (Guardian REAL-Time System) Tested Simultaneously in Ambulatory Patients with Type 1 Diabetes
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. - : Mary Ann Liebert Inc. - 1520-9156 .- 1557-8593. ; 16:11, s. 759-767
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is a tool widely used in the treatment of patients with type 1 diabetes. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate whether accuracy and patient treatment satisfaction differ between the Enlite (TM) (Medtronic MiniMed, Inc., Northridge, CA) and Dexcom((R)) (San Diego, CA) G4 PLATINUM CGM sensors. Subjects and Methods: Thirty-eight ambulatory patients with type 1 diabetes used the Dexcom G4 and Enlite sensors simultaneously for a minimum of 4 and maximum of 6 days. Patients measured capillary glucose levels with a HemoCue((R)) (angelholm, Sweden) system six to 10 times a day. In addition, two inpatient studies were performed between Days 1-3 and 4-6. Results: The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) in blood glucose for the Dexcom G4 was significantly lower (13.9%) than for the Enlite sensor (17.8%) (P<0.0001). The corresponding MARDs for Days 1-3 were 15.0% versus 19.4% (P=0.0027) and 13.6% versus 15.9% (P=0.026) for Days 4-6. For glucose levels in the hypoglycemic range (<4.0 mmol/L), the MARD for the Dexcom G4 was 20.0% compared with 34.7% for the Enlite (P=0.0041). On a visual analog scale (VAS) (0-100), patients rated the Dexcom G4 more favorably than the Enlite in 12 out of the 13 user experience questions. For example, more patients rated their experience with the Dexcom G4 as positive (VAS, 79.7 vs. 46.6; P<0.0001) and preferred to use it in their daily lives (VAS, 79.1 vs. 42.1; P<0.0001). Conclusions: The Dexcom G4 sensor was associated with greater overall accuracy than the Enlite sensor during initial (Days 1-3) and later (Days 4-6) use and for glucose levels in the hypoglycemic range. Patients reported a significantly more positive experience using the Dexcom G4 than the Enlite.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
