| 1. |
- Löwhagen Hendén, Pia, et al.
(författare)
-
General Anesthesia Versus Conscious Sedation for Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: The AnStroke Trial (Anesthesia During Stroke).
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Stroke. - 1524-4628. ; 48:6, s. 1601-1607
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Retrospective studies have found that patients receiving general anesthesia for endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke have worse neurological outcome compared with patients receiving conscious sedation. In this prospective randomized single-center study, we investigated the impact of anesthesia technique on neurological outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients.Ninety patients receiving endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke in 2013 to 2016 were included and randomized to general anesthesia or conscious sedation. Difference in neurological outcome at 3 months, measured as modified Rankin Scale score, was analyzed (primary outcome) and early neurological improvement of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and cerebral infarction volume. Age, sex, comorbidities, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, intraprocedural blood pressure, blood glucose, Paco2 and Pco2 modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia score, and relevant time intervals were recorded.In the general anesthesia group 19 of 45 patients (42.2%) and in the conscious sedation group 18 of 45 patients (40.0%) achieved a modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 (P=1.00) at 3 months, with no differences in intraoperative blood pressure decline from baseline (P=0.57); blood glucose (P=0.94); PaCO2 (P=0.68); time intervals (P=0.78); degree of successful recanalization, 91.1% versus 88.9% (P=1.00); National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at 24 hours 8 (3-5) versus 9 (2-15; P=0.60); infarction volume, 20 (10-100) versus 20(10-54) mL (P=0.53); and hospital mortality (13.3% in both groups; P=1.00).In endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke, no difference was found between general anesthesia and conscious sedation in neurological outcome 3 months after stroke.URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01872884.
|
|
| 2. |
- Löwhagen Hendén, Pia, et al.
(författare)
-
Hypotension During Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic Stroke Is a Risk Factor for Poor Neurological Outcome.
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation. - 1524-4628. ; 46:9, s. 2678-2680
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In retrospective studies, patients receiving general anesthesia for endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke have worse neurological outcome compared with patients receiving conscious sedation. It has been suggested that this is caused by general anesthesia-associated hypotension. We investigated the effect of intraprocedural hypotension on neurological outcome.
|
|
| 3. |
- Löwhagen Hendén, Pia, et al.
(författare)
-
Off-hour admission and impact on neurological outcome in endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. - : Wiley. - 0001-5172 .- 1399-6576. ; 36:2, s. 208-214
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- © 2018 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd Background and Purpose: In the new era of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke, one of the main predictors of good neurological outcome is a short time interval from stroke onset to recanalization of the occluded vessel. In this study, we examined the effect of on-hour vs off-hour admittance on the time intervals from stroke onset to recanalization in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT). Methods: One-hundred-ninety-eight patients receiving EVT for anterior AIS between 2007 and 2016 were included. Time of day and weekday for stroke admittance were recorded as well as several time intervals. Age, sex, co-morbidities, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), intraprocedural blood pressure, blood glucose, modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia score (mTICI) and neurological outcome at 3months, measured as modified Rankin Scale (mRS), were registered. On-hour was defined as 8am-4pm weekdays, and off-hour as weekdays outside these hours and weekends. Results: The time interval from CT (computed tomography) to recanalization was longer during off-hours, while no difference was seen in the time interval from stroke onset to CT. No statistically significant difference was seen in neurological outcome between the on- and off-hour groups in a univariate analysis. Conclusions: Stroke admittance during off-hours is associated with longer time interval from CT examination to vessel recanalization. The study highlights the need of logistic improvement and probably more resources off-hour in order to deliver an effective stroke care around the clock.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Rentzos, Alexandros, 1979
(författare)
-
Endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke
- 2017
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Intravenous thrombolysis is effective in patients with minor stroke but not in patients with moderate or major stroke due to large vessel occlusion. Endovascular stroke treatment offers a high recanalization rate, which is associated with favorable neurological outcome. The aim of our studies was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the endovascular stroke treatment in the anterior and posterior circulation, respectively, as performed in the Neurointerventional unit of Sahlgrenska University Hospital. Two major anesthesia forms are used in endovascular stroke treatment, general anesthesia, and conscious sedation. The aim was also to evaluate the impact of intra-procedural hypotension and to compare general anesthesia and conscious sedation with respect to radiological and neurological outcome. Methods: Paper I and Paper II are retrospective studies on efficacy and safety of endovascular stroke treatment in the anterior and posterior circulation, respectively. Paper III is a retrospective study on the impact of intraprocedural hypotension on neurological outcome in patients treated under general anesthesia. Paper IV is a prospective randomized study, where patients eligible for endovascular stroke treatment were randomized to general anesthesia or conscious sedation. Results: Paper I showed that the successful recanalization rate in endovascular stroke treatment in the anterior circulation was 74%, the complication rate was 5% and favorable neurological outcome at 3 months was found in 42%. Paper II showed successful recanalization in 73% of patients treated for stroke in the posterior circulation with serious procedural complications in 5 % and favorable outcome in 35% at 3 months. Paper III showed that a fall in mean arterial pressure of >40% is an independent predictor of poor neurological outcome. Paper IV showed no difference in neurological outcome at 3 months between patients randomized to general anesthesia or conscious sedation when a strict protocol for avoidance of intra-procedural hypotension was followed. Conclusion: Endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the anterior and posterior circulation can achieve high recanalization rates with low complication rates. Intra-procedural hypotension is associated with poor neurological outcome but the choice of anesthesia method does not influence the neurological outcome if severe hypotension is avoided.
|
|
| 6. |
- Rentzos, Alexandros, 1979, et al.
(författare)
-
Endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke in the posterior circulation.
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences. - : SAGE Publications. - 2385-2011. ; 24:4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and purpose Recent randomized clinical trials have proved the efficacy of endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation. However, the benefit of endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke in the posterior circulation remains to be proven since it was excluded from these trials. We evaluate the benefit of endovascular treatment in posterior circulation strokes. Methods A total of 110 consecutive patients with posterior circulation stroke who underwent endovascular treatment in our institute in the period 1991-2015 were included. Recanalization rate according to modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia score and neurological outcome at three months according to modified Rankin Scale were the main outcomes. Collateral circulation, procedural complications and radiological outcome were evaluated in the radiological examinations. Results The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was 31 (IQR: 13-31) and median time from symptom onset to groin puncture was 300 (IQR: 175-463) minutes. Successful recanalization was seen in 80 of 110 patients (73%). Favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤2) was seen in 38 patients (35%) while moderate favorable outcome (≤3) was seen in 48 patients (44%). Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 10 patients (9%). An association between collateral circulation, recanalization rate and outcome was seen. Conclusion Endovascular treatment for posterior circulation stroke in this single-center cohort is relatively safe and effective with decreased mortality and increased favorable outcome compared to natural history.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Rosengren, Lars, 1954, et al.
(författare)
-
Värna utförarens kompetens vid intrakraniell trombektomi
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Läkartidningen. - 0023-7205. ; 2018:115
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Den snabbkurs för kardiologer om 3–6 månader som föreslås av Sjögren och medförfattare utgör endast en bråkdel av den utbildningsinsats som det finns konsensus om, skriver 12 medlemmar i Nationella arbetsgruppen för stroke i en replik om trombektomi. De föreslår att ett modernt nationellt ambulanshelikoptersystem etableras.
|
|
| 9. |
- Schönenberger, Silvia, et al.
(författare)
-
Association of General Anesthesia vs Procedural Sedation With Functional Outcome Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Undergoing Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
- 2019
-
Ingår i: JAMA. - : American Medical Association (AMA). - 1538-3598 .- 0098-7484. ; 322:13, s. 1283-1293
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- General anesthesia during thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke has been associated with poor neurological outcome in nonrandomized studies. Three single-center randomized trials reported no significantly different or improved outcomes for patients who received general anesthesia compared with procedural sedation.To detect differences in functional outcome at 3 months between patients who received general anesthesia vs procedural sedation during thrombectomy for anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke.MEDLINE search for English-language articles published from January 1, 1980, to July 31, 2019.Randomized clinical trials of adults with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of at least 10 and anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke assigned to receive general anesthesia or procedural sedation during thrombectomy.Individual patient data were obtained from 3 single-center, randomized, parallel-group, open-label treatment trials with blinded end point evaluation that met inclusion criteria and were analyzed using fixed-effects meta-analysis.Degree of disability, measured via the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score (range 0-6; lower scores indicate less disability), analyzed with the common odds ratio (cOR) to detect the ordinal shift in the distribution of disability over the range of mRS scores.A total of 368 patients (mean [SD] age, 71.5 [12.9] years; 163 [44.3%] women; median [interquartile range] National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 17 [14-21]) were included in the analysis, including 183 (49.7%) who received general anesthesia and 185 (50.3%) who received procedural sedation. The mean 3-month mRS score was 2.8 (95% CI, 2.5-3.1) in the general anesthesia group vs 3.2 (95% CI, 3.0-3.5) in the procedural sedation group (difference, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.03-0.83]; cOR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.09-2.29]; P=.02). Among prespecified adverse events, only hypotension (decline in systolic blood pressure of more than 20% from baseline) (80.8% vs 53.1%; OR, 4.26 [95% CI, 2.55-7.09]; P<.001) and blood pressure variability (systolic blood pressure >180 mm Hg or <120 mm Hg) (79.7 vs 62.3%; OR, 2.42 [95% CI, 1.49-3.93]; P<.001) were significantly more common in the general anesthesia group.Among patients with acute ischemic stroke involving the anterior circulation undergoing thrombectomy, the use of protocol-based general anesthesia, compared with procedural sedation, was significantly associated with less disability at 3 months. These findings should be interpreted tentatively, given that the individual trials examined were single-center trials and disability was the primary outcome in only 1 trial.
|
|
