| 1. |
- Dahlbäck, Cecilia, et al.
(författare)
-
Aesthetic result after breast-conserving therapy is associated with quality of life several years after treatment. Swedish women evaluated with BCCT.core and BREAST-Q (TM)
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0167-6806 .- 1573-7217. ; 164:3, s. 679-687
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- A gold standard for evaluation of aesthetic outcome after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) is still lacking. The BCCT.core software has been developed to assess aesthetic result in a standardised way. We aimed to study how the result of BCCT.core after BCT is associated with quality of life, measured with the BREAST-Q (TM), a validated questionnaire. Women eligible for BCT were consecutively recruited between February 1st 2008 and January 31st 2012 (n = 653). Photographs of 310 women, taken one year after BCT, were evaluated using the BCCT.core software. The postoperative BCT module of the BREAST-Q (TM) questionnaire was administered by mail and 348 questionnaires were returned (median 5.5 years after BCT). In all, 216 women had both BCCT.core results and completed BREAST-Q (TM) questionnaires available. The results from the BCCT.core evaluation were: excellent n = 49 (15.8%); good n = 178 (57.4%); fair n = 73 (23.5%); poor n = 10 (3.2%). The median BREAST-Q (TM) score for satisfaction with breasts was 66 [interquartile range (IQR) 57-80] and for psychosocial well-being 82 (IQR 61-100). Poor/fair results on BCCT.core were associated with Q-scores below median for both satisfaction with breasts [odds ratio (OR) 3.4 (confidence interval (CI) 1.7-6.8)] as well as for psychosocial well-being [OR 2.2 (CI 1.1-4.2)]. A statistically significant association between BCCT.core results one year after BCT and quality of life ratings using BREAST-Q (TM) several years later is shown in this study. This implies that the BCCT.core may be valuable in BCT follow-up and used as a standardised instrument in the evaluation of aesthetic results.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- DAHLBÄCK, CECILIA, et al.
(författare)
-
Patients Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery Can Benefit from the Opportunity to Participate in Choosing Their Surgical Technique
- 2017
-
Ingår i: World Journal of Surgery. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0364-2313 .- 1432-2323. ; 41:3, s. 734-741
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Shared decision-making is increasingly advocated in many countries. The aims of this study were to investigate whether patients receiving breast-conserving surgery at Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Sweden, perceived an offered possibility to join in the decision-making process regarding the surgical method; to identify potential determinants for not having perceived such an offer; and to study how this perception of being offered an opportunity to take part in the decision-making process affected satisfaction with the aesthetic outcome. Methods: Women offered breast-conserving surgery were consecutively recruited over a period of 4 years. In all, 324 women completed a study-specific questionnaire. Results: A majority of the women (53 %) perceived that they had not, or had only partly, been offered a possibility to take part in the decision-making process. Patients who reported that they had received enough preoperative information regarding the expected aesthetic result were more likely to have perceived such an offer (odds ratio (OR) 5.44; confidence interval (CI) 2.83–10.43). Women who had perceived an opportunity to be involved were more satisfied with the aesthetic result (OR 2.71; CI 1.18–6.25) and more likely to have had their expectations met regarding the aesthetic result (OR 5.91; CI 2.01–17.38). Conclusion: When deciding on a suitable surgical approach for women with early breast cancer, physicians could try to more clearly communicate to the women that they can choose whether or not to participate in the decision-making regarding surgical technique. This might improve satisfaction. An important part of patient involvement is sufficient preoperative information.
|
|
| 4. |
- Rose, Michael, et al.
(författare)
-
Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Compared to Conventional Breast-Conserving Surgery With Regard to Oncologic Outcome
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Clinical Breast Cancer. - : Elsevier BV. - 1526-8209.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: Oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS) has been implemented with increasing frequency in the treatment of breast cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the oncologic outcome after OBS to the outcome after conventional breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in patients with invasive breast cancer. Patients and Methods: In all, 197 patients treated with OBS were compared to 1399 patients treated with conventional BCS from 2008 to 2013. We evaluated nonradical primary tumor excision, time to initiation of adjuvant therapy, disease-free survival (risk of recurrent disease), and survival (cause specific and overall). Identification of patients and follow-up were made using the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group registry and the Danish Cause of Death registry. Multivariate logistic regression and the Cox proportional hazard analysis were used to obtain odds ratios and hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: There was a lower risk for nonradical primary tumor excision for patients undergoing OBS versus conventional BCS (adjusted odds ratio:95% CI, 0.50:0.29-0.84). No significant differences were found with regard to a delay in initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio:95% CI, 1.14:0.89-1.45) or radiotherapy (0.91:0.71-1.16), disease-free survival (1.23:0.61-2.47), breast cancer as cause of death (1.46:0.52-4.09), breast cancer as underlying or multiple cause of death (0.90:0.34-2.37), or overall survival (0.90:0.51-1.60). Conclusion: We found no significant differences in oncologic outcome comparing OBS to conventional BCS. However, a lower risk of nonradical primary tumor excision was found for patients treated with OBS. These results indicate that OBS is a safe procedure.
|
|
