| 1. |
- Börner, Gabriel, et al.
(författare)
-
Suture-TOOL : A suturing device for swift and standardized abdominal aponeurosis closure
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Surgery in Practice and Science. - : Elsevier BV. - 2666-2620. ; 11
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: Surgeons can reduce incisional hernia formation by adhering to standardized techniques for incisional wound closure. This is often neglected by the time a long operation is to be ended and can lead to the risk of developing an incisional hernia or a wound rupture. To address this issue, a suturing machine (Suture-TOOL) was developed for swift and standardized abdominal closure. The aim was to compare the user safety, speed, and suturing quality between Suture-TOOL and manual Needle-Driver suturing. Method: Fifteen surgeons who were specialists in surgery, urology, and gynaecology as well as surgical trainees were invited. The Suture-TOOL was presented to the surgeons who read the instructions for use before starting the test. Each surgeon closed nine 15 cm-long incisions in a human body model; six with Suture-TOOL and three with the Needle-Driver technique. Gloves were examined for puncture damage. Endpoints were suture-length/wound-length (SL/WL)-ratio, closure time, number of stitches, learning curve, and glove puncture rate. A VAS-evaluation concerning different Suture-Tool user impressions was completed. Results: A SL/WL-ratio ≥4 was 98% for Suture-TOOL versus 69% for Needle-Driver (p < 0.001). Suture time was shorter for Suture-TOOL (p < 0.001). Wound stitch count was higher for Needle-Driver (p = 0.013). The median SL/WL-ratio was similar between groups. The learning curve plateaued after three closures using Suture-TOOL. Two glove punctures were detected—all in the Needle-Driver group. Suture-TOOL received high VAS scores for all measured functionalities. Conclusion: Suture-TOOL is a promising device for clinical use. It is safe, easy, and fast resulting in a high-quality suture lines with a short learning curve and a high functionality ranking.
|
|
| 2. |
- Gutlic, Allan, et al.
(författare)
-
Pain with sexual activity at 1 and 3 years : Comparing total extraperitoneal with Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair in a randomized setting (TEPLICH trial)
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Surgery (United States). - : Elsevier BV. - 0039-6060. ; 172:5, s. 1463-1470
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Pain at sexual activity induced by an inguinal hernia or as a cause of its repair is not thoroughly studied. Reported frequencies are between 25% and 30% preoperatively and 10% and 15% postoperatively. The primary aim was to analyze pain at sexual activity at 1 year comparing total extraperitoneal with Lichtenstein repair in a randomized setting. Methods: Men, 30 to 60 years old, with a primary inguinal hernia were randomized to total extraperitoneal without mesh fixation or Lichtenstein repair. A questionnaire on pain prevalence, frequency, intensity, and impairment of sexual functions caused by pain at sexual activity was introduced. Clinical examination, a questionnaire on sexual function, and the 36-Item Short Form Survey were performed preoperatively and at 1 and 3 years postoperatively. A risk factor analysis for pain at sexual activity as performed. Results: A total of 243 patients (111 total extraperitoneal and 132 Lichtenstein) were included between 2008 and 2014; 97% remained for 1-year and 90% for 3-year analysis. Preoperative pain at sexual activity was reported in 35%, with a reduction to 5.9% in total extraperitoneal and 12.5% in Lichtenstein (P = .098) at 1 year and 7.0% in total extraperitoneal and 9.3% in Lichtenstein (P = .566) at 3 years. Quality of life preoperatively was markedly reduced in patients with pain at sexual activity but restored almost to norm levels at 1 and 3 years. New pain at sexual activity (harm) was seen in 8 patients (3.6%) at 1 year. Risk factors for having postoperative pain at sexual activity were preoperative pain and Lichtenstein technique. Conclusion: Pain at sexual activity in inguinal hernia patients is more common than suspected and reduces quality of life. Repair will markedly reduce pain at sexual activity and restore quality of life in most patients without difference between techniques. Patients should be informed on a potential relation between having an inguinal hernia and sexual impairment.
|
|
| 3. |
- Johan Drott, Carl, et al.
(författare)
-
Fler akuta gallstensoperationer och färre elektiva under pandemin : [Swedish gallstone surgery during the covid-19 pandemic]
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Läkartidningen. - : Läkartidningen. - 0023-7205 .- 1652-7518. ; 119
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The covid-19 pandemic has necessitated reallocation of health care resources. This has raised concerns about the risks associated with postponing surgery for benign conditions that are given low priority. Data from the population-based Swedish National Register for Gallstone Surgery (GallRiks) show that the total number of procedures carried out during the initial months of each wave of the pandemic decreased. This was followed by a moderate increase in the number of procedures performed for acute cholecystitis, biliary pancreatitis, and obstructive jaundice. The consequences of the delayed surgery in the community at large and how this has affected health-related quality of life for patients having their procedure postponed remain to be evaluated, but so far it does not seem to have caused a major impact on public health.
|
|
| 4. |
- Johan Drott, Carl, et al.
(författare)
-
Fler akuta gallstensoperationer och färre elektiva under pandemin
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Lakartidningen. - 0023-7205. ; 119
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The covid-19 pandemic has necessitated reallocation of health care resources. This has raised concerns about the risks associated with postponing surgery for benign conditions that are given low priority. Data from the population-based Swedish National Register for Gallstone Surgery (GallRiks) show that the total number of procedures carried out during the initial months of each wave of the pandemic decreased. This was followed by a moderate increase in the number of procedures performed for acute cholecystitis, biliary pancreatitis, and obstructive jaundice. The consequences of the delayed surgery in the community at large and how this has affected health-related quality of life for patients having their procedure postponed remain to be evaluated, but so far it does not seem to have caused a major impact on public health.
|
|
| 5. |
- Sandblom, Gabriel, et al.
(författare)
-
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of gallstone surgery : a Swedish population-based study
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Surgery. - : Sage Publications. - 1457-4969 .- 1799-7267. ; 111:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has had a significant impact on healthcare delivery. As resources are reallocated, surgery for benign conditions such as gallstone disease is often given low priority. We do not know how this has affected the risk of patients with uncomplicated gallstone disease to develop acute cholecystitis, biliary pancreatitis, or obstructive jaundice.METHODS: The study was based on the population-based Swedish Register of Gallstone Surgery and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography. The period prior to the first cases of COVID-19 in Sweden, that is, April 2015-March 2020, was compared to the period April 2020-March 2021 during the pandemic. Stratification was made for factors potentially related to priority decisions.RESULTS: Altogether, 78,211 procedures were performed during the period of the study. The ratio of procedures performed during April 2020-March 2021 in the previous 5 years was 0.960 (p = 0.113). The ratio of procedures on patients aged <65 years was 0.945 (p = 0.008), on patients aged 65-80 years was 0.964 (p = 0.423), on patients aged >80 years was 1.336 (p = 0.025), on men was 1.001 (p = 0.841), on women was 0.934 (p = 0.006), on procedures completed laparoscopically was 0.964 (p = 0.190), on procedures completed with open approach was 0.659 (p = 0.044), on acute procedures was 1.218 (p = 0.016), on planned procedures was 0.791 (p < 0.001), on procedures performed for biliary colic was 0.808 (p < 0.001), on procedures performed for acute cholecystitis was 1.274 (p = 0.012), for biliary pancreatitis was 1.192 (p = 0.037), and for obstructive jaundice was 1.366 (p = 0.008).CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 has had a great impact on how gallstone surgery has been organized over the last 2 years. The decreased number of planned procedures probably reflects the reallocation of resources during the pandemic. However, whether the increasing number of acute procedures is the result of postponed planned surgery or a continuation of a long-term trend toward more acute surgery remains unanswered. Further studies are needed to assess and evaluate how this has affected public health and health economics.
|
|
| 6. |
- Sandblom, Gabriel, et al.
(författare)
-
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of gallstone surgery: A Swedish population-based study.
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian journal of surgery : SJS : official organ for the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society. - : SAGE Publications. - 1799-7267 .- 1457-4969. ; 111:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has had a significant impact on healthcare delivery. As resources are reallocated, surgery for benign conditions such as gallstone disease is often given low priority. We do not know how this has affected the risk of patients with uncomplicated gallstone disease to develop acute cholecystitis, biliary pancreatitis, or obstructive jaundice.The study was based on the population-based Swedish Register of Gallstone Surgery and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography. The period prior to the first cases of COVID-19 in Sweden, that is, April 2015-March 2020, was compared to the period April 2020-March 2021 during the pandemic. Stratification was made for factors potentially related to priority decisions.Altogether, 78,211 procedures were performed during the period of the study. The ratio of procedures performed during April 2020-March 2021 in the previous 5 years was 0.960 (p = 0.113). The ratio of procedures on patients aged <65 years was 0.945 (p = 0.008), on patients aged 65-80 years was 0.964 (p = 0.423), on patients aged >80 years was 1.336 (p = 0.025), on men was 1.001 (p = 0.841), on women was 0.934 (p = 0.006), on procedures completed laparoscopically was 0.964 (p = 0.190), on procedures completed with open approach was 0.659 (p = 0.044), on acute procedures was 1.218 (p = 0.016), on planned procedures was 0.791 (p < 0.001), on procedures performed for biliary colic was 0.808 (p < 0.001), on procedures performed for acute cholecystitis was 1.274 (p = 0.012), for biliary pancreatitis was 1.192 (p = 0.037), and for obstructive jaundice was 1.366 (p = 0.008).The COVID-19 has had a great impact on how gallstone surgery has been organized over the last 2 years. The decreased number of planned procedures probably reflects the reallocation of resources during the pandemic. However, whether the increasing number of acute procedures is the result of postponed planned surgery or a continuation of a long-term trend toward more acute surgery remains unanswered. Further studies are needed to assess and evaluate how this has affected public health and health economics.
|
|
