| 1. |
- Andersson, Alma, et al.
(författare)
-
Spatial Deconvolution of HER2-positive Breast Tumors Reveals Novel Intercellular Relationships
- 2020
-
Annan publikation (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- In the past decades, transcriptomic studies have revolutionized cancer treatment and diagnosis. However, tumor sequencing strategies typically result in loss of spatial information, critical to understand cell interactions and their functional relevance. To address this, we investigate spatial gene expression in HER2-positive breast tumors using Spatial Transcriptomics technology. We show that expression-based clustering enables data-driven tumor annotation and assessment of intra-and interpatient heterogeneity; from which we discover shared gene signatures for immune and tumor processes. We integrate and spatially map tumor-associated types from single cell data to find: segregated epithelial cells, interactions between B and T-cells and myeloid cells, co-localization of macrophage and T-cell subsets. A model is constructed to infer presence of tertiary lymphoid structures, applicable across tissue types and technical platforms. Taken together, we combine different data modalities to define novel interactions between tumor-infiltrating cells in breast cancer and provide tools generalizing across tissues and diseases.
|
|
| 2. |
- Yoosuf, Niyaz, et al.
(författare)
-
Identification and transfer of spatial transcriptomics signatures for cancer diagnosis
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Breast Cancer Research. - : BioMed Central. - 1465-5411 .- 1465-542X. ; 22:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Distinguishing ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) from invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) regions in clinical biopsies constitutes a diagnostic challenge. Spatial transcriptomics (ST) is an in situ capturing method, which allows quantification and visualization of transcriptomes in individual tissue sections. In the past, studies have shown that breast cancer samples can be used to study their transcriptomes with spatial resolution in individual tissue sections. Previously, supervised machine learning methods were used in clinical studies to predict the clinical outcomes for cancer types. Methods: We used four publicly available ST breast cancer datasets from breast tissue sections annotated by pathologists as non-malignant, DCIS, or IDC. We trained and tested a machine learning method (support vector machine) based on the expert annotation as well as based on automatic selection of cell types by their transcriptome profiles. Results: We identified expression signatures for expert annotated regions (non-malignant, DCIS, and IDC) and build machine learning models. Classification results for 798 expression signature transcripts showed high coincidence with the expert pathologist annotation for DCIS (100%) and IDC (96%). Extending our analysis to include all 25,179 expressed transcripts resulted in an accuracy of 99% for DCIS and 98% for IDC. Further, classification based on an automatically identified expression signature covering all ST spots of tissue sections resulted in prediction accuracy of 95% for DCIS and 91% for IDC. Conclusions: This concept study suggest that the ST signatures learned from expert selected breast cancer tissue sections can be used to identify breast cancer regions in whole tissue sections including regions not trained on. Furthermore, the identified expression signatures can classify cancer regions in tissue sections not used for training with high accuracy. Expert-generated but even automatically generated cancer signatures from ST data might be able to classify breast cancer regions and provide clinical decision support for pathologists in the future.
|
|
