| 1. |
- Gustavsson, Inger, 1965-, et al.
(författare)
-
Type-specific detection of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) in self-sampled cervicovaginal cells applied to FTA elute cartridge
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Virology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1386-6532 .- 1873-5967. ; 51:4, s. 255-258
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundMost procedures for self-sampling of cervical cells are based on liquid-based media for transportation and storage. An alternative is to use a solid support, such as dry filter paper media.ObjectivesTo evaluate if self-sampling of cervicovaginal fluid using a cytobrush (Viba-brush; Rovers Medical Devices B.V., Oss, The Netherlands) and a solid support such as the Whatman Indicating FTA® Elute cartridge (GE Healthcare, United Kingdom) can be used for reliable typing of human papillomavirus (HPV), as compared to cervical samples obtained by a physician using a cytobrush and the indicating FTA® Elute Micro card and biopsy analysis.Study designA total of 50 women with a previous high-risk (HR) HPV positive test were invited to perform self-sampling using the Viba-brush and the FTA cartridge and thereafter a physician obtained a cervical sample using the cytobrush and a FTA card, together with a cervical biopsy for histology and HPV typing. Detection of HR-HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58 and 59 was performed using three multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays.ResultAll samples contained sufficient amounts of genomic DNA and the self-samples yielded on average 3.5 times more DNA than those obtained by the physician. All women that were positive for HR-HPV in the biopsy sample also typed positive both by self-sampling and physician-obtained sampling. For women with a histological diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2–3 (CIN 2–3) all three HPV samples showed 100% concordance. A higher number of women were HPV positive by self-sampling than by physician-obtained sampling or by biopsy analysis.ConclusionThe Viba-brush and the FTA cartridge are suitable for self-sampling of vaginal cells and subsequent HR-HPV typing.
|
|
| 2. |
- Gyllensten, Ulf, et al.
(författare)
-
Short-time repeat high-risk HPV testing by self-sampling for screening of cervical cancer
- 2011
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Cancer. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0007-0920 .- 1532-1827. ; 105:5, s. 694-697
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Testing for high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) in primary screening for cervical cancer is considered more sensitive, but less specific, in comparison with Pap-smear cytology. Women with persistent HPV infections have a higher risk of developing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ (CIN2+) lesions. This study was performed to evaluate the gain in specificity for detection of histologically confirmed CIN2+ lesions achieved by short-time repeat testing for high-risk HPV in women aged 30-65 years, with the primary sample for HPV analysis taken by self-sampling. METHODS: A total of 8000 women in Uppsala County, aged 30-65 years, who had not attended organised screening for 6 years or longer, were offered self-sampling of vaginal fluid at home and the samples sent for HPV typing. Of these, 8% (669) were not possible to contact or had performed hysterectomy. Women positive for high-risk HPV in the self-sampling test were invited for a follow-up HPV test and a cervical biopsy on average 3 months after the initial HPV test. RESULTS: In all, 39% (2850/7331) of invited women chose to perform self-sampling of vaginal fluid at home. High-risk HPV infection was found in 6.6% (188) of the women. In all, 89% of the women testing HPV positive performed a follow-up examination, on average 2.7 months, after the first test and 59% of these women were HPV positive in the follow-up test. The prevalence of CIN2+ lesions in women with an initial HPV-positive test was 23% (95% CI 18-30%) and in women with two consecutive HPV-positive tests was 41% (95% CI 31-51%). In women with two positive HPV tests, the prevalence of CIN2+ lesions varied from 49% in women at age 30-39 years to 24% in women at age 50-65 years. Short-time repeat HPV testing increased the specificity for detection of CIN2+ lesions from about 94.2% to 97.8%. The most prevalent HPV types were HPV16 (32%), followed by HPV18/45 (19%) and HPV 33/52/58 (19%). CONCLUSION: The short-time persistence of high-risk HPV infection in this age group was about 60%. Repeat testing for high-risk HPV using self-sampling of vaginal fluid can be used to increase the specificity in the screening for cervical cancer in women aged 30-65 years.
|
|
| 3. |
- Lindell, Monica, et al.
(författare)
-
Self-sampling of vaginal fluid and high-risk human papillomavirus testing in women aged 50 years or older not attending Papanicolaou smear screening
- 2012
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. - : Wiley. - 1470-0328 .- 1471-0528. ; 119:2, s. 245-248
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Please cite this paper as: Lindell M, Sanner K, Wikström I, Wilander E. Self-sampling of vaginal fluid and high-risk human papillomavirus testing in women aged 50 years or older not attending Papanicolaou smear screening. BJOG 2012;119:245-248. Objectives To study the value of self-sampling of vaginal fluid at home in combination with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in a cohort of older women not attending Papanicolaou (Pap) smear screening. Design Women (n = 3618), aged 50-65 years, who had not attended screening for at least 6 years were offered self-sampling of vaginal fluid at home (study cohort). The collected material was analysed for the presence of high-risk HPV (using Hybrid capture 2; Hc2). Women with a positive HPV test were referred for colposcopy. These results were compared with the results of Pap smear screening in a corresponding age group of women (controls). The end point of the study was identification of a histological cervical intraepithelial neoplasia stage 2 (CIN2) and above (CIN2+). Results In all, 39.4% (n = 1426) women participated and 4.6% (n = 66) were high-risk HPV positive. Of the HPV-positive women 56 chose to attend a surgery (84.8%) after a mean time of 2.1 months and ten of these women (17.9%) showed CIN2+, corresponding to 0.70% of all participating women. In the controls, who participated in organised Pap smear screening, the prevalence of CIN2+ was 0.25% (15/6048). The odds ratio for identification of CIN2+ in women aged 50 years or older performing self-sampling and HPV test in comparison with Pap smear was: 2.84 (95% CI 1.14-6.77, P = 0.0174). In older women primary high-risk HPV testing (Hc2) and Pap smear screening showed equal specificity of around 96%. Conclusions Self-sampling of vaginal fluid in combination with high-risk HPV testing appears to be an attractive method to improve screening coverage and decrease the prevalence of cervical cancer in women aged 50 years or older.
|
|
| 4. |
- Sanner, Karin
(författare)
-
Significance of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Analysis for the Detection of Precancerous Cervical Lesions : Impact of Self Sampling
- 2013
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer, with about 500 000 new cases per year among women worldwide. With a well-organized screening programme the number of cases can be reduced by more than 50%. In spite of having such a screening programme there are still around 450 new cases yearly in Sweden. The majority of these cases occur in non-attendees. There is thus a need to improve the Swedish cervical cancer screening programme in order to further reduce the number of cases of cervical cancer.Cervical cancer and high-grade cervical dysplasia are caused by sexually transferred high-risk human papillomaviruses (HR-HPVs). In cases of persistent HR-HPV infection there is a risk of development of dysplasia and in some cases subsequent progress to cervical cancer. HR-HPV testing shows high sensitivity as regards the detection of cervical dysplasia. Self-sampling of vaginal fluid for the analysis of HR-HPV has many advantages, since a woman can perform the sampling herself in a private setting, whenever suitable, without the need to travel to a clinic.Our studies have shown that sensitivity in the detection of precancerous lesions is about twice as great with the HR-HPV self-test compared with cytology-based tests. If a woman was HR-HPV-positive in two consecutive tests, the specificity of the HR-HPV test increased to about 98%. Among women with short-term persistent HR-HPV infection, the prevalence of CIN 2+ was over 40%. There was good concordance in sensitivity as regards the detection of CIN 2+ between self-obtained and physician-obtained samples, although self-sampling was associated with slightly lower specificity.The prevalence of HR-HPV from day to day in premenopausal women was not influenced by hormonal changes during the menstrual cycle. Neither were there significant day-to-day changes in postmenopausal women. A single self-test thus provides reliable information on whether or not a woman has an HR-HPV infection.In conclusion, self-sampling combined with the analysis of HR-HPV appears to be a powerful alternative as a primary screening method for the prevention of cervical cancer. Self-sampling for HR-HPV testing is a suitable, safe and accepted strategy for cervical cancer prevention among women.
|
|
| 5. |
- Wikström, Ingrid, 1949-, et al.
(författare)
-
Self-sampling and HPV testing or ordinary Pap-smear in women not regularly attending screening : a randomised study
- 2011
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Cancer. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0007-0920 .- 1532-1827. ; 105:3, s. 337-339
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Most women with cervical cancer have not participated in Pap-smear screening. Self-sampling of vaginal fluid in combination with high-risk HPV testing may be a method to increase the attendance rate. METHODS: A total of 4060 women, 39-60 years old, who had not attended the organised Pap-smear screening for 6 years or more were randomised into two equal groups. A study group was offered to self-sample vaginal fluid (Qvintip) at home and/or recommended to attend the Pap-smear screening. The collected fluid after self-sampling was examined for the presence of high-risk HPV (Hybrid Capture 2 method). Controls were only recommended to attend the Pap-smear screening. The end point was a histological identification of CIN2-3. RESULTS: The participation rate was 39% (771 out of 2000) in the self-sampling group and 9% (188 out of 2060) in the conventional cytology (P < 0.001). The number of histological CIN2-3 alterations detected was 0.4% (8 out of 2000) among women offered self-sampling of vaginal fluid and 0.07% (3 out of 4060) in women offered Pap-smears. The odds ratio (OR) for offering self-sampling and HPV testing instead of Pap-smear screening for detection of CIN2-3 was OR 5.42 (95% CI: 1.30-31.8). CONCLUSION: Offering self-sampling of vaginal fluid followed by a high-risk HPV test was considerably more effective for detection of histological CIN2-3 lesions in comparison with offering Pap-test in a midwife reception in women not regularly attending organised screening.
|
|
