| 1. |
- Jansson, John-Olov, 1954, et al.
(författare)
-
The dual hypothesis of homeostatic body weight regulation, including gravity-dependent and leptin-dependent actions.
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences. - 1471-2970. ; 378:1888
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Body weight is tightly regulated when outside the normal range. It has been proposed that there are individual-specific lower and upper intervention points for when the homeostatic regulation of body weight is initiated. The nature of the homeostatic mechanisms regulating body weight at the lower and upper ends of the body weight spectrum might differ. Previous studies demonstrate that leptin is the main regulator of body weight at the lower end of the body weight spectrum. We have proposed that land-living animals use gravity to regulate their body weight. We named this homeostatic system the gravitostat and proposed that there are two components of the gravitostat. First, an obvious mechanism involves increased energy consumption in relation to body weight when working against gravity on land. In addition, we propose that there exists a component, involving sensing of the body weight by osteocytes in the weight-bearing bones, resulting in a feedback regulation of energy metabolism and body weight. The gravity-dependent homeostatic regulation is mainly active in obese mice. We, herein, propose the dual hypothesis of body weight regulation, including gravity-dependent actions (= gravitostat) at the upper end and leptin-dependent actions at the lower end of the body weight spectrum. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Causes of obesity: theories, conjectures and evidence (Part II)'.
|
|
| 2. |
- Peris-Sampedro, Fiona, et al.
(författare)
-
A skeleton in the cupboard in ghrelin research: Where are the skinny dwarfs?
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Journal of Neuroendocrinology. - : Wiley. - 0953-8194 .- 1365-2826. ; 33:11
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Based on studies delivering ghrelin or ghrelin receptor agonists, we have learned a great deal about the importance of the brain ghrelin signalling system for a wide range of physiological processes that include feeding behaviours, growth hormone secretion and glucose homeostasis. Because these processes can be considered as essential to life, the question arises as to why mouse models of depleted ghrelin signalling are not all skinny dwarfs with a host of behavioural and metabolic problems. Here, we provide a systematic detailed review of the phenotype of mice with deficient ghrelin signalling to help better understand the relevance and importance of the brain ghrelin signalling system, with a particular emphasis on those questions that remain unanswered.
|
|
| 3. |
- Schéle, Erik, 1980, et al.
(författare)
-
Ghrelin Induces Place Preference for Social Interaction in the Larger Peer of a Male Rat Pair.
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Neuroscience. - : Elsevier BV. - 1873-7544 .- 0306-4522.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Social interaction is important for survival in most social species including humans. To ensure social activities, individuals experience reward from social interaction, generating a powerfully reinforcing process. Here we hypothesized that reward from social interaction in a juvenile male rat pair may be enhanced by ghrelin, a circulating hormone that has been shown to enhance reward from other natural (e.g. food, sex) as well as artificial reinforcers (e.g. alcohol and other drugs of abuse). To this end, we assessed the impact of ghrelin and a ghrelin antagonist on preference for a chamber previously paired to the presence of a social partner in a conditioned place preference paradigm. We found that ghrelin increased and a ghrelin antagonist decreased preference for social interaction but only in the heavier partner in a social pair. In addition, we found that administered ghrelin induced a positive association between preference for social interaction and body weight difference within socially interacting pairs, where larger ghrelin treated rats preferred social interaction, and whereas smaller ghrelin treated rats avoided it, which raises the question if ghrelin could have a role in implementing social hierarchies in rats. In summary, we conclude that ghrelin signaling increases the reward from social interaction in a manner that reflects the degree of divergence in body weight between the social pair.
|
|
