| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Berg, Lotta, et al.
(författare)
-
Yttrande från SLUs vetenskapliga råd för djurskydd om djurskydd inom grisuppfödning
- 2019
-
Annan publikation (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Detta yttrande svarar på följande fråga av Djurskyddet Sverige, Svenska Djurskyddsföreningen, Djurens Rätt, World Animal Protection Sverige, Compassion in World Farming Sverige och Vi Konsumenter, som vänt sig till det vetenskapliga rådet med anledning av Jordbruksverkets ändring av djurskyddsbestämmelserna för gris, Statens jordbruksverks föreskrifter och allmänna råd m ( SJVFS 2017:25) om grishållning inom lantbruket m.m., saknr. L 106: Är det förenat med bättre, likvärdig eller sämre djurvälfärd, vid en sammantagen bedömning av såväl smågrisens välfärd som suggans, om smågrisar avvänjs från suggan vid 21 dagars ålder i stället för vid 28 dagars ålder? Rådet ombads att belysa frågan utifrån ett brett perspektiv innefattande såväl psykisk som fysisk hälsa och välbefinnande.
|
|
| 6. |
- Berg, Lotta, et al.
(författare)
-
Yttrande från SLUs vetenskapliga råd för djurskydd om hållande av hund och katt
- 2018
-
Annan publikation (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Detta yttrande är skrivet på uppdrag av Jordbruksverket i samband med verkets översyn av föreskrifterna för hund och katt. För att Jordbruksverkets föreskrifter ska vara väl förankrade i den senaste forskningen önskar verket inhämta underlag från det vetenskapliga rådet för djurskydd vid Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, specifikt gällande områdena rörelsebehov, social kontakt och avvänjning.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Elofsson, Katarina, et al.
(författare)
-
Så bör viltskadorna ersättas
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Svenska dagbladet. - 1101-2412.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)
|
|
| 9. |
- Jansson, Anna, et al.
(författare)
-
Shaping the Swedish landscape: a future for the Gotland russ
- 2016
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Tree encroachment and abandonment of pastures is an important cause of biodiversity loss in Sweden. In thisstudy, we evaluate the impact of all-year-around grazing by an ancient horse breed, the Gotland russ (GR),on tree encroachment. Twelve GR stallions were kept in 3 enclosures (lat: 59, long: 17, 4 GR/enclosure, 7ha forest and 3 ha open fields/enclosure) from May 2014 (age 1 yrs) until February 2016. Prior to the study,3 exclosures (EX, 5×42.5 m) where GR grazing was excluded were centered with the long side at the borderbetween forest and field. The field part of EX were further divided into four 5×5 m sections starting from theforest (1 to 4). Tree type (deciduous, spruce or pine), number and height were registered in the sections and theequivalent, grazed area adjacent to the EX on the 25th of February 2016. Body condition (BC) was assessedweekly using a 9 leveled scoring system. Individuals <4 were withdrawn, fed and reintroduced when BC was>4. Analysis of tree heights and numbers were made by procGLM in SAS. There was no difference in the totalnumber of deciduous trees (21±8 vs 25±8), spruces (2±1 vs 3±1) and pines (0.2±0.2 vs 0.8±0.2) between EXand grazed areas (P>0.05). In the grazed areas, the deciduous trees were shorter compared to the trees in EX(330±57 vs 780±70 mm, P<0.0001). There was no difference in spruce height (EX: 920±110 vs grazed areas:780±130 mm, P=0.31). In the grazed areas, tree height decreased from quarter 1 to 4 (1: 610±60, 2: 230±110, 3:140±90 and 4: 60±100 mm, P<0.0001) whereas in EX, the height increased (1: 740±60, 2: 570±150, 3: 810±90and 4: 960±100 mm, P<0.02). Four individuals (3 from the same enclosure) were withdrawn temporarily inFebruary 2015 due to BC <4. The study show that grazing by GR may inhibit encroachment by deciduoustrees and that BC was maintained in most individuals, despite the semi-feral conditions. The results providea new use for a threatened, ancient breed in landscape management.
|
|
| 10. |
- Lindsjö, Johan, et al.
(författare)
-
The Dividing Line Between Wildlife Research and Management-Implications for Animal Welfare
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Frontiers in Veterinary Science. - : Frontiers Media SA. - 2297-1769. ; 6
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Wild animals are used for research and management purposes in Sweden and throughout the world. Animals are often subjected to similar procedures and risks of compromised welfare from capture, anesthesia, handling, sampling, marking, and sometimes selective removal. The interpretation of the protection of animals used for scientific purposes in Sweden is based on the EU Directive 2010/63/EU. The purpose of animal use, irrespective if the animal is suffering or not, decides the classification as a research animal, according to Swedish legislation. In Sweden, like in several other European countries, the legislation differs between research and management. Whereas, animal research is generally well-defined and covered in the legislation, wildlife management is not. The protection of wild animals differs depending on the procedure they are subjected to, and how they are classified. In contrast to wildlife management activities, research projects have to implement the 3Rs and must undergo ethical reviews and official animal welfare controls. It is often difficult to define the dividing line between the two categories, e.g., when marking for identification purposes. This gray area creates uncertainty and problems beyond animal welfare, e.g., in Sweden, information that has been collected during management without ethical approval should not be published. The legislation therefore needs to be harmonized. To ensure consistent ethical and welfare assessments for wild animals at the hands of humans, and for the benefit of science and management, we suggest that both research and management procedures are assessed by one single Animal Ethics Committee with expertise in the 3Rs, animal welfare, wildlife population health and One Health. We emphasize the need for increased and improved official animal welfare control, facilitated by compatible legislation and a similar ethical authorization process for all wild animal procedures.
|
|
