| 1. |
- Stenberg, Jenny, 1976-
(författare)
-
Fluid Management in Haemodialysis : Studies on current practices and new methods
- 2020
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Chronic fluid overload has been identified as an independent predictor of mortality in haemodialysis patients, and 30% remain fluid overloaded at dry weight. The use of bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) in fluid management may improve blood pressure control and cardiovascular status. However, the importance of regular and careful clinical assessment of fluid balance is repeatedly emphasised.This thesis is based on five papers and the overall aim was to investigate current practices and new methods for fluid management in haemodialysis, and to develop a management tool for dry weight determination, based on multiple complementary methods. The purpose was to contribute to reduced prevalence of fluid overload and intradialytic symptoms in haemodialysis patients, by providing the healthcare team and the patient with a tool, that facilitates communication and enables informed decision-making in dry weight determination.In the initial, cross-sectional study, clinical praxis for dry weight assessment in Sweden and Denmark was investigated. A wide variation in routines was found. Despite high access, BIS was sparsely used. Instead, nurses’ authorisation to adjust haemodialysis patients’ dry weight was associated with improved fluid status. The second study had a qualitative approach. Focus group interviews, with healthcare professionals, were carried out to achieve a deeper understanding of the factors preventing or facilitating the use of BIS. In the third study, the usefulness of a biomarker, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), for assessing fluid status in haemodialysis patients, was investigated. An association between BNP and fluid overload was established. The between-individual variation in BNP levels was greater than the within-individual variation over time. Therefore, if BNP is to be used as a marker for fluid overload, repeated measurements are required. In the fourth study, we developed and validated a multifactorial decision aid, Recova®, that incorporates BIS in dry weight determination. Recova® is based on physiological parameters routinely measured in haemodialysis and provides guidance on when and how to respond to recognised fluid alterations. In the fifth study, the decision aid’s effect on volume status was tested in a cohort of haemodialysis patients. Implementation of Recova® had effect on fluid status symptoms, BIS-measured hydration status and NT-proBNP levels.
|
|
| 2. |
- Nasic, Salmir, et al.
(författare)
-
Sex-specific time trends of long-term graft survival after kidney transplantation : a registry-based study
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Renal failure. - : Taylor & Francis. - 0886-022X .- 1525-6049. ; 45:2
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Sex-specific trends over time with respect to kidney graft survival have scarcely been described in earlier studies. The present study aimed to examine whether kidney graft survival differs between women and men over time.Methods: This study was based on prospectively collected data extracted from a quality registry including all kidney transplant patients between January 1965 and September 2017 at the transplantation center of a university hospital in Sweden. The transplantation center serves a population of approximately 3.5 million inhabitants. Only the first graft for each patient was included in the study resulting in 4698 transplantations from unique patients (37% women, 63% men). Patients were followed-up until graft failure, death, or the end of the study. Death-censored graft survival analysis after kidney transplantation (KT) was performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test, and analysis adjusted for confounders was performed using multivariable Cox regression analysis.Results: Median age at transplantation was 48 years (quartiles 36–57 years) and was similar for women and men. Graft survival was analyzed separately in four transplantation periods that represented various immunosuppressive regimes (1965-1985, 1986–1995, 1996–2005, and 2006–2017). Sex differences in graft survival varied over time (sex-by-period interaction, p = 0.026). During the three first periods, there were no significant sex differences in graft survival. However, during the last period, women had shorter graft survival (p = 0.022, hazard ratio (HR) 1.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1–2.7, adjusted for covariates). Biopsy-proven rejections were more common in women.Conclusions: In this registry-based study, women had shorter graft survival than men during the last observation period (years 2006–2017).
|
|
