| 1. |
- Aazh, H, et al.
(författare)
-
Influence of ear canal occlusion and static pressure difference on bone conduction thresholds: Implications for mechanisms of bone conduction
- 2005
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Audiology. - : Informa Healthcare. - 1499-2027 .- 1708-8186. ; 44:5, s. 302-306
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The effect of air pressure change on bone conduction (BC) hearing thresholds in the occluded ear was investigated. The pump manometer system of an impedance bridge was used to change the air pressure in the ear canal of twenty-two normally hearing subjects. BC thresholds were measured with: (1) open ear; (2) the ear canal occluded with a probe tube and application of 0 daPa air pressure; and (3) the ear canal occluded with a probe tube and application of -350 daPa air pressure. Thresholds were lower in condition 2 than in condition 1, the difference decreasing from 27 dB at 2500 Hz to 4.5 dB at 2000 Hz. Thresholds were higher in condition 3 than in condition 2. The results are interpreted in terms of changes in the relative contribution of the three routes of transmission for BC sound produced by occlusion and by a static pressure difference.
|
|
| 2. |
- Brandt, Anders, et al.
(författare)
-
Properties of bone conduction hearing
- 2006
-
Ingår i: XXIV International Modal Analysis Conference, St. Louis, Missouri.
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 3. |
- Brandt, Anders, et al.
(författare)
-
Properties of Bone Conduction Hearing
- 2006
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Bone conduction sound, the transmission of sound as vibrations in the skull bone, is used in several areas, forexample for hearing aids, in audiometry, and in communication systems. The bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA)has been commercially available for many years. This device utilizes titanium screws attached to the skull bonepenetrating the soft tissues thus providing a rigid attachment to the skull bone. Subjects equipped with suchtitanium screws have proven important for investigation of bone conducted sound and in the present paper anoverview of some results from different studies on such patients is given. Included are results from investigationsof resonance frequencies, propagation delays, and transcranial (cross-skull) attenuation.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Eeg-Olofsson, Måns, 1967, et al.
(författare)
-
Transmission of bone-conducted sound in the human skull measured by cochlear vibrations.
- 2008
-
Ingår i: International journal of audiology. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1708-8186 .- 1499-2027. ; 47:12, s. 761-9
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- One limitation with the Bone Anchored Hearing Aid (Baha) is too poor amplification for patients with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing losses. Therefore, we investigated if bone conducted (BC) sound transmission improves when the stimulation approaches the cochlea. Also the influence from the squamosal suture on BC sound transmission was investigated. Both sides of the heads on seven human cadavers were used and vibrational stimulation was applied at eight positions on each side with a frequency range of 0.1-10 kHz. A laser Doppler vibrometer was used to measure the resulting velocity of the cochlear promontory. It was found that the velocity of the promontory increases as the stimulation position approaches the cochlea; this was especially apparent at distances within 2.5 cm from the ear canal opening and when the stimulation position was in the opened mastoid. At frequencies above 500 Hz there was on average 10 to 20 dB greater vibrational response at the cochlea when the stimulation was close to the cochlea compared with the normal Baha position. Moreover, even if there were general indications of attenuation of BC sound when passing the squamosal suture, an effect from the suture could not be conclusively determined.
|
|
| 6. |
- Håkansson, Bo, et al.
(författare)
-
A novel bone conduction implant (BCI)
- 2009
-
Ingår i: 2<sup>nd</sup> Int Symposium on Bone Conduction Hearing – Craniofacial Osseointegration, Göteborg, Sweden.
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Håkansson, Bo, 1953, et al.
(författare)
-
Percutaneous Versus Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant System : A Feasibility Study on a Cadaver Head
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Otology and Neurotology. - 1531-7129 .- 1537-4505. ; 29:8, s. 1132-1139
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) is an important rehabilitation alternative for patients who have conductive or mixed hearing loss. However, these devices use a percutaneous and bone-anchored implant that has some drawbacks reported. A transcutaneous bone conduction implant system (BCI) is proposed as an alternative to the percutaneous system because it leaves the skin intact. The BCI transmits the signal to a permanently implanted transducer with an induction loop system through the intact skin. The aim of this study was to compare the electroacoustic performance of the BAHA Classic-300 with a full-scale BCI on a cadaver head in a sound field. The BCI comprised the audio processor of the vibrant sound bridge connected to a balanced vibration transducer (balanced electromagnetic separation transducer).Methods: Implants with snap abutments were placed in the parietal bone (Classic-300) and 15-mm deep in the temporal bone (BCI). The vibration responses at the ipsilateral and contralateral cochlear promontories were measured with a laser Doppler vibrometer, with the beam aimed through the ear canal.Results: Results show that the BCI produces approximately 5 dB higher maximum output level and has a slightly lower distortion than the Classic-300 at the ipsilateral promontorium at speech frequencies. At the contralateral promontorium, the maximum output level was considerably lower for the BCI than for the Classic-300 except in the 1-2 kHz range, where it was similar.Conclusion: Present results support the proposal that a BCI system can be a realistic alternative to a BAHA.
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
