| 1. |
- Koumarianou, Anna, et al.
(författare)
-
Temozolomide in Advanced Neuroendocrine Neoplasms : Pharmacological and Clinical Aspects
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Neuroendocrinology. - : S. Karger AG. - 0028-3835 .- 1423-0194. ; 101:4, s. 274-288
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Alkylating agents, such as streptozocin and dacarbazine, have been reported as active in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral, potentially less toxic derivative of dacarbazine, which has shown activity both as a single agent and in combination with other drugs. Nevertheless, its role in NENs has not been well defined. Several retrospective and prospective phase I-II studies have been published describing its use in a variety of NENs. In a retrospective series, the combination of capecitabine and TMZ was reported to be associated with a particularly high tumour response in pancreatic NENs as a first-line treatment. Although in NENs, determination of the CP-nnethylguanineDNA methyltransferase (MGMT) status has been suggested as a predictive biomarker of response, its role still remains investigational, awaiting validation along with the establishment of the optimal detection method. Metronomic schedules have been reported to potentially overcome MGMT-related drug resistance. Toxicity is manageable if well monitored. We reviewed the literature regarding pharmacological and clinical aspects of TMZ, focusing on specific settings of NENs, different schedules, toxicity and safety profiles, and potential predictive biomarkers of response.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Strosberg, Jonathan, et al.
(författare)
-
Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Progressive Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated With Lu-177-Dotatate in the Phase III NETTER-1 Trial
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Oncology. - : AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY. - 0732-183X .- 1527-7755. ; 36:25, s. 2578-2584
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PurposeNeuroendocrine tumor (NET) progression is associated with deterioration in quality of life (QoL). We assessed the impact of Lu-177-Dotatate treatment on time to deterioration in health-related QoL.MethodsThe NETTER-1 trial is an international phase III study in patients with midgut NETs. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with Lu-177-Dotatate versus high-dose octreotide. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality-of-life questionnaires QLQ C-30 and G.I.NET-21 were assessed during the trial to determine the impact of treatment on health-related QoL. Patients completed the questionnaires at baseline and every 12 weeks until tumor progression. QoL scores were converted to a 100-point scale according to European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer instructions, and individual changes from baseline scores were assessed. Time to QoL deterioration (TTD) was defined as the time from random assignment to the first QoL deterioration 10 points for each patient in the corresponding domain scale. All analyses were conducted on the intention-to-treat population. Patients with no deterioration were censored at the last QoL assessment date.ResultsTTD was significantly longer in the Lu-177-Dotatate arm (n = 117) versus the control arm (n = 114) for the following domains: global health status (hazard ratio [HR], 0.406), physical functioning (HR, 0.518), role functioning (HR, 0.580), fatigue (HR, 0.621), pain (HR, 0.566), diarrhea (HR, 0.473), disease-related worries (HR, 0.572), and body image (HR, 0.425). Differences in median TTD were clinically significant in several domains: 28.8 months versus 6.1 months for global health status, and 25.2 months versus 11.5 months for physical functioning.ConclusionThis analysis from the NETTER-1 phase III study demonstrates that, in addition to improving progression-free survival, Lu-177-Dotatate provides a significant QoL benefit for patients with progressive midgut NETs compared with high-dose octreotide.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Strosberg, Jonathan R., et al.
(författare)
-
Efficacy of octreotide long-acting repeatable in neuroendocrine tumors : RADIANT-2 placebo arm post hoc analysis
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Endocrine-Related Cancer. - 1351-0088 .- 1479-6821. ; 22:6, s. 933-940
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Somatostatin analogues (SSA) have demonstrated antiproliferative activity in addition to efficacy for carcinoid symptom control in functional neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Apost hoc analysis of the placebo arm of the RAD001 In Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors-2 (RADIANT-2) study was conducted to assess the efficacy of octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Out of 213 patients randomized to placebo plus octreotide LAR in RADIANT-2, 196 patients with foregut, midgut, or hindgut NETwere considered for present analysis. Of these, 41 patients were SSA-treatment naive and 155 had received SSA therapy before study entry. For SSA-naive patients, median PFS by adjudicated central review was 13.6 (95% CI 8.2-22.7) months. For SSA-naive patients with midgut NET (nZ24), median PFS was 22.2 (95% CI 8.3-29.5) months. For patients who had received SSA previously, the median PFS was 11.1 (95% CI 8.4-14.3) months. Among the SSA-pretreated patients who had midgut NET (nZ119), the median PFS was 12.0 (95% CI 8.4-19.3) months. Median OS was 35.8 (95% CI 32.5-48.9) months for patients in the placebo plus octreotide LAR arm; 50.6 (36.4 -not reached) months for SSA-naive patients and 33.5 (95% CI 27.5-44.7) months for those who had received prior SSA. This post hoc analysis of the placebo arm of the large phase 3 RADIANT-2 study provides data on PFS and OS among patients with progressive NET treated with octreotide therapy.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Strosberg, Jonathan R., et al.
(författare)
-
NETTER-1 phase III : Progression-free survival, radiographic response, and preliminary overall survival results in patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumors treated with 177-Lu-Dotatate
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Oncology. - Univ S Florida, H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr, Tampa, FL 33682 USA. Univ Kentucky, Lexington, KY USA. Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA. Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA. Vet Adm Med Ctr, Iowa City, IA USA. Royal Free Hosp, Pond St, London NW3 2QG, England. Zent Klin Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany. Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA. Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Dept Oncol, Rochester, MN USA. Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Samuel Oschin Comprehens Canc Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA. Univ Uppsala Hosp, Uppsala, Sweden. Adv Accelerator Applicat, New York, NY USA. Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands. Beaujon Hosp, Clichy, France. Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.. - 0732-183X .- 1527-7755. ; 34:4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 8. |
- Öberg, Kjell, et al.
(författare)
-
A Delphic consensus assessment : imaging and biomarkers in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor disease management
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Endocrine Connections. - 2049-3614. ; 5:5, s. 174-187
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The complexity of the clinical management of neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) is exacerbated by limitations in imaging modalities and a paucity of clinically useful biomarkers. Limitations in currently available imaging modalities reflect difficulties in measuring an intrinsically indolent disease, resolution inadequacies and inter-/intra-facility device variability and that RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria are not optimal for NEN. Limitations of currently used biomarkers are that they are secretory biomarkers (chromogranin A, serotonin, neuron-specific enolase and pancreastatin); monoanalyte measurements; and lack sensitivity, specificity and predictive capacity. None of them meet the NIH metrics for clinical usage. A multinational, multidisciplinary Delphi consensus meeting of NEN experts (n = 33) assessed current imaging strategies and biomarkers in NEN management. Consensus (>75%) was achieved for 78% of the 142 questions. The panel concluded that morphological imaging has a diagnostic value. However, both imaging and current single-analyte biomarkers exhibit substantial limitations in measuring the disease status and predicting the therapeutic efficacy. RECIST remains suboptimal as a metric. A critical unmet need is the development of a clinico-biological tool to provide enhanced information regarding precise disease status and treatment response. The group considered that circulating RNA was better than current general NEN biomarkers and preliminary clinical data were considered promising. It was resolved that circulating multianalyte mRNA (NETest) had clinical utility in both diagnosis and monitoring disease status and therapeutic efficacy. Overall, it was concluded that a combination of tumor spatial and functional imaging with circulating transcripts (mRNA) would represent the future strategy for real-time monitoring of disease progress and therapeutic efficacy.
|
|
| 9. |
- Öberg, Kjell, et al.
(författare)
-
Consensus on biomarkers for neuroendocrine tumour disease
- 2015
-
Ingår i: The Lancet Oncology. - 1470-2045 .- 1474-5488. ; 16:9, s. E435-E446
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Management of neuroendocrine neoplasia represents a clinical challenge because of its late presentation, lack of treatment options, and limitations in present imaging modalities and biomarkers to guide management. Monoanalyte biomarkers have poor sensitivity, specificity, and predictive ability. A National Cancer Institute summit, held in 2007, on neuroendocrine tumours noted biomarker limitations to be a crucial unmet need in the management of neuroendocrine tumours. A multinational consensus meeting of multidisciplinary experts in neuroendocrine tumours assessed the use of current biomarkers and defined the perquisites for novel biomarkers via the Delphi method. Consensus (at > 75%) was achieved for 88 (82%) of 107 assessment questions. The panel concluded that circulating multianalyte biomarkers provide the highest sensitivity and specifi city necessary for minimum disease detection and that this type of biomarker had sufficient information to predict treatment effectiveness and prognosis. The panel also concluded that no monoanalyte biomarker of neuroendocrine tumours has yet fulfilled these criteria and there is insufficient information to support the clinical use of miRNA or circulating tumour cells as useful prognostic markers for this disease. The panel considered that trials measuring multianalytes (eg, neuroendocrine gene transcripts) should also identify how such information can optimise the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumours.
|
|
