| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Korenblik, R., et al.
(författare)
-
Dragon 1 Protocol Manuscript : Training, Accreditation, Implementation and Safety Evaluation of Portal and Hepatic Vein Embolization (PVE/HVE) to Accelerate Future Liver Remnant (FLR) Hypertrophy
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology. - : Springer. - 0174-1551 .- 1432-086X. ; 45, s. 1391-1398
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Study Purpose The DRAGON 1 trial aims to assess training, implementation, safety and feasibility of combined portal- and hepatic-vein embolization (PVE/HVE) to accelerate future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy in patients with borderline resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. Methods The DRAGON 1 trial is a worldwide multicenter prospective single arm trial. The primary endpoint is a composite of the safety of PVE/HVE, 90-day mortality, and one year accrual monitoring of each participating center. Secondary endpoints include: feasibility of resection, the used PVE and HVE techniques, FLR-hypertrophy, liver function (subset of centers), overall survival, and disease-free survival. All complications after the PVE/HVE procedure are documented. Liver volumes will be measured at week 1 and if applicable at week 3 and 6 after PVE/HVE and follow-up visits will be held at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the resection. Results Not applicable. Conclusion DRAGON 1 is a prospective trial to assess the safety and feasibility of PVE/HVE. Participating study centers will be trained, and procedures standardized using Work Instructions (WI) to prepare for the DRAGON 2 randomized controlled trial. Outcomes should reveal the accrual potential of centers, safety profile of combined PVE/HVE and the effect of FLR-hypertrophy induction by PVE/HVE in patients with CRLM and a small FLR.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- V. Kabadi, N., et al.
(författare)
-
Thermal decoupling of deuterium and tritium during the inertial confinement fusion shock-convergence phase
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Physical review. E. - : American Physical Society. - 2470-0045 .- 2470-0053. ; 104:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- A series of thin glass-shell shock-driven DT gas-filled capsule implosions was conducted at the OMEGA laser facility. These experiments generate conditions relevant to the central plasma during the shock-convergence phase of ablatively driven inertial confinement fusion (ICF) implosions. The spectral temperatures inferred from the DTn and DDn spectra are most consistent with a two-ion-temperature plasma, where the initial apparent temperature ratio, T-T/T-D, is 1.5. This is an experimental confirmation of the long-standing conjecture that plasma shocks couple energy directly proportional to the species mass in multi-ion plasmas. The apparent temperature ratio trend with equilibration time matches expected thermal equilibration described by hydrodynamic theory. This indicates that deuterium and tritium ions have different energy distributions for the time period surrounding shock convergence in ignition-relevant ICF implosions.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Biurrun, Idoia, et al.
(författare)
-
Benchmarking plant diversity of Palaearctic grasslands and other open habitats
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Journal of Vegetation Science. - Oxford : John Wiley & Sons. - 1100-9233 .- 1654-1103. ; 32:4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Journal of Vegetation Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Association for Vegetation Science.Aims: Understanding fine-grain diversity patterns across large spatial extents is fundamental for macroecological research and biodiversity conservation. Using the GrassPlot database, we provide benchmarks of fine-grain richness values of Palaearctic open habitats for vascular plants, bryophytes, lichens and complete vegetation (i.e., the sum of the former three groups). Location: Palaearctic biogeographic realm. Methods: We used 126,524 plots of eight standard grain sizes from the GrassPlot database: 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 100 and 1,000 m2 and calculated the mean richness and standard deviations, as well as maximum, minimum, median, and first and third quartiles for each combination of grain size, taxonomic group, biome, region, vegetation type and phytosociological class. Results: Patterns of plant diversity in vegetation types and biomes differ across grain sizes and taxonomic groups. Overall, secondary (mostly semi-natural) grasslands and natural grasslands are the richest vegetation type. The open-access file ”GrassPlot Diversity Benchmarks” and the web tool “GrassPlot Diversity Explorer” are now available online (https://edgg.org/databases/GrasslandDiversityExplorer) and provide more insights into species richness patterns in the Palaearctic open habitats. Conclusions: The GrassPlot Diversity Benchmarks provide high-quality data on species richness in open habitat types across the Palaearctic. These benchmark data can be used in vegetation ecology, macroecology, biodiversity conservation and data quality checking. While the amount of data in the underlying GrassPlot database and their spatial coverage are smaller than in other extensive vegetation-plot databases, species recordings in GrassPlot are on average more complete, making it a valuable complementary data source in macroecology. © 2021 The Authors.
|
|
| 7. |
- Halle-Smith, James M., et al.
(författare)
-
Perioperative interventions to reduce pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy : meta-analysis
- 2022
-
Ingår i: The British journal of surgery. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1365-2168 .- 0007-1323. ; 109:9, s. 812-821
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Data on interventions to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) are conflicting. The aim of this study was to assimilate data from RCTs. METHODS: MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched systematically for RCTs evaluating interventions to reduce all grades of POPF or clinically relevant (CR) POPF after PD. Meta-analysis was undertaken for interventions investigated in multiple studies. A post hoc analysis of negative RCTs assessed whether these had appropriate statistical power. RESULTS: Among 22 interventions (7512 patients, 55 studies), 12 were assessed by multiple studies, and subjected to meta-analysis. Of these, external pancreatic duct drainage was the only intervention associated with reduced rates of both CR-POPF (odds ratio (OR) 0.40, 95 per cent c.i. 0.20 to 0.80) and all-POPF (OR 0.42, 0.25 to 0.70). Ulinastatin was associated with reduced rates of CR-POPF (OR 0.24, 0.06 to 0.93). Invagination (versus duct-to-mucosa) pancreatojejunostomy was associated with reduced rates of all-POPF (OR 0.60, 0.40 to 0.90). Most negative RCTs were found to be underpowered, with post hoc power calculations indicating that interventions would need to reduce the POPF rate to 1 per cent or less in order to achieve 80 per cent power in 16 of 34 (all-POPF) and 19 of 25 (CR-POPF) studies respectively. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis supports a role for several interventions to reduce POPF after PD. RCTs in this field were often relatively small and underpowered, especially those evaluating CR-POPF.
|
|
| 8. |
- Murray, Alison E., et al.
(författare)
-
Roadmap for naming uncultivated Archaea and Bacteria
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Nature Microbiology. - : NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP. - 2058-5276. ; 5:8, s. 987-994
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The assembly of single-amplified genomes (SAGs) and metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) has led to a surge in genome-based discoveries of members affiliated with Archaea and Bacteria, bringing with it a need to develop guidelines for nomenclature of uncultivated microorganisms. The International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP) only recognizes cultures as 'type material', thereby preventing the naming of uncultivated organisms. In this Consensus Statement, we propose two potential paths to solve this nomenclatural conundrum. One option is the adoption of previously proposed modifications to the ICNP to recognize DNA sequences as acceptable type material; the other option creates a nomenclatural code for uncultivated Archaea and Bacteria that could eventually be merged with the ICNP in the future. Regardless of the path taken, we believe that action is needed now within the scientific community to develop consistent rules for nomenclature of uncultivated taxa in order to provide clarity and stability, and to effectively communicate microbial diversity. In this Consensus Statement, the authors discuss the issue of naming uncultivated prokaryotic microorganisms, which currently do not have a formal nomenclature system due to a lack of type material or cultured representatives, and propose two recommendations including the recognition of DNA sequences as type material.
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Oren, A., et al.
(författare)
-
International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Prokaryotic Code (2022 Revision)
- 2023
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. - 1466-5026. ; 73:5A
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Fourteen years have passed since the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes (ICSP) at its plenary meeting in Istanbul in 2008 approved the previous version of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP, the Prokaryotic Code, the Code), and we thank the Editors for overseeing its publication in 2019 [1]. Updating the Prokaryotic Code was long overdue in view of the large number of subsequent proposals to emend the General Considerations, Principles, Rules and Recom-mendations, and Appendices of the Code. In the period 2008-2020, 45 such proposals were published in the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology [2]. Most of those were only recently discussed and voted on by the members of the ICSP, following the adoption of revised statutes in 2019 [3], which transferred responsibility for dealing with proposed emendations from the Judicial Commission to the Editorial Board of the ICNP. The current Editorial Board of the ICNP, appointed in 2020, has therefore prepared proposals for emendation of the Code, which were submitted for balloting among the full and co -opted members of the ICSP, in accordance with its statutes [3]. The ballot took place in April-June 2022 and we present here the 2022 revision of the Code, incorporating the changes approved by the voting members of the ICSP. To comply with Article 4(d) of the statutes of the ICSP that state that the business of the ICSP should be conducted publicly, the voting was preceded by a 6 -month period (July-December 2021), during which anyone interested could post comments via an online platform [4]. The editorial board of the ICSP is pleased with the lively discussions that developed on many issues relating to the Code. Numerous suggestions and ideas to improve the text of the Code were brought forward during this public discussion and many are incorporated in the current revision. Two previously approved major changes are also included in the new revision: (1) The rank of phylum was added to the ranks covered by the rules of the Code. This important change was approved by the ICSP in a separate ballot held in 2021 after a public discussion was held on this topic [5]. (2) The formal inclusion of the Cyanobacteria in the rules of the Code [6], a change that required modification of numerous rules to harmonize the treatment of the nomenclature of the Cyanobacteria with the relevant rules of the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants [7]. This change was also approved by the ICSP in a separate ballot held in 2021, following a public discussion. Numerous minor modifications of the Code have been made that clarify its meaning, affecting topics such as notes, nomenclatural types, and effective publications, as well as valid publication, legitimacy, priority and orthography of names. The Judicial Commission of the ICSP issued numerous opinions in the past few years, and Appendix 5 - Opinions Relating to the Nomenclature of Prokaryotes - has been updated to include the latest opinions issued. Based on those opinions, Appendix 4 - Conserved and Rejected Names of Prokaryotic Taxa - has been updated, as well. Numerous additions have been made in Appendix 9 - Orthography. The new version of this Appendix should be useful for assisting authors in proposing correctly formed names that comply with the rules of the Code. We aimed to shorten and simplify the ICNP where possible. Therefore, we have not reprinted the prefaces to the earlier versions of the Code and have not included the extended information about the older versions of the different codes of nomenclature (Appendix 1), the recipients of the van Niel International Prize prior to 2014 (Appendix 12) and activities of the congresses prior to 2019 (Appendix 13). These changes were endorsed by the ICSP. The earlier information is available in the 2008 revision of the ICNP [1].
|
|
