| 1. |
- Perry, H E, et al.
(författare)
-
A novel study of association between Neisseria gonorrhoeae and the human carbohydrate blood groups.
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Immunohematology / American Red Cross. - 0894-203X. ; 23:3, s. 100-4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Previous studies of association of ABO blood groups with gonorrhea have shown contradictory results. Despite the interdependencies of ABO, Lewis, and secretor systems, none of the previous studies examined the combined effect of these systems on their proposed association with gonorrhea. This study attempted to redress that and used genotyping in addition to RBC phenotyping to determine correct tissue phenotypes. Samples from 131 gonorrhea-positive individuals and from 175 gonorrhea-negative individuals were typed for ABO and Lewis using routine antisera. Secretor and Lewis genotyping was performed to ensure accurate determination of ABO and Lewis phenotypes. Chi-square and probability values were used to examine whether there is an association of ABO, Lewis, and secretor systems with gonorrhea infection. Neither single nor combined statistical analysis of data sets yielded a significant association of ABO, Lewis, and secretor phenotypes with Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Nevertheless, this study is an example of the approach that should be taken when examining microbial associations with ABO antigens, in turn influenced by coexpression and modification by the interdependent systems of Lewis and secretor, in mucosal tissues.
|
|
| 2. |
- Svensson, Lola, 1948, et al.
(författare)
-
Blood group A(1) and A(2) revisited: an immunochemical analysis.
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Vox sanguinis. - : Wiley. - 1423-0410 .- 0042-9007. ; 96:1, s. 56-61
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The basis of blood group A(1) and A(2) phenotypes has been debated for many decades, and still the chemical basis is unresolved. The literature generally identifies the glycolipid chemical differences between blood group A(1) and A(2) phenotypes as being poor or no expression of A type 3 and A type 4 structures on A(2) red cells, although this assertion is not unanimous. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using purified glycolipids and specific monoclonal antibodies, we revisited the glycolipid basis of the A(1) and A(2) phenotypes. Purified glycolipids were extracted from four individual A(1) and four individual A(2) blood units. One blood unit from an A weak subgroup was also included. Monoclonal anti-A reagents including those originally used to define the basis of A(1) and A(2) phenotypes were used in a thin layer chromatography - enzyme immunoassay to identify the presence of specific glycolipids. RESULTS: A type 3 glycolipid structures were found to be present in large amounts in all phenotypes. In contrast, the A type 4 glycolipid structure was virtually undetectable in the A(2) phenotype, but was present in the A(1) and A subgroup samples. CONCLUSION: The major glycolipid difference between the A(1) and A(2) phenotypes is the dominance of A type 4 glycolipids in the A(1) phenotype.
|
|
| 3. |
- Svensson, Lola, 1948, et al.
(författare)
-
Novel glycolipid variations revealed by monoclonal antibody immunochemical analysis of weak ABO subgroups of A.
- 2005
-
Ingår i: Vox sanguinis. - : Wiley. - 0042-9007 .- 1423-0410. ; 89:1, s. 27-38
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The chemical basis of the subgroups of A is largely unknown. We used thin-layer chromatography immunochemical staining techniques together with a range of characterized monoclonal reagents to analyse glycolipids isolated from a variety of weak subgroups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Glycolipids isolated from red cells collected from nine genetically defined individuals of the rare subgroups of A, including a novel A(3) allele (A(2) 539G>A) not described previously, were subjected to a highly sensitive thin-layer chromatographic immunochemical analysis. RESULTS: Semicharacterized monoclonal antibodies revealed that, in addition to the expected quantitative differences between common phenotypes and the weak subgroups, qualitative glycolipid differences (or at least an apparent qualitative basis), caused by major changes in the ratios of different structures exist. Specifically it was found that the weakest A-expressing samples (A(el) phenotype) appeared to express an unusual A structure in the 8-12 sugar region. Variable expression of several structures in one of the A weak samples were suggestive of novel blood group A structures. CONCLUSIONS: Although no structural characterization could be undertaken, the results are clearly indicative that the variant glycosyltransferases of the rare ABO subgroups are not only inefficient, but they may potentially synthesize novel ABO structures.
|
|
