| 1. |
- Albrektsson, Tomas, 1945, et al.
(författare)
-
An Imbalance of the Immune System Instead of a Disease Behind Marginal Bone Loss Around Oral Implants: Position Paper
- 2020
-
Ingår i: The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. - : Quintessence Publishing. - 1942-4434 .- 0882-2786. ; 35:3, s. 495-502
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to present evidence that supports the notion that the primary reason behind marginal bone loss and implant failure is immune-based and that bacterial actions in the great majority of problematic cases are of a secondary nature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The paper is written as a narrative review. RESULTS: Evidence is presented that commercially pure titanium is not biologically inert, but instead activates the innate immune system of the body. For its function, the clinical implant is dependent on an immune/inflammatory defense against bacteria. Biologic models such as ligature studies have incorrectly assumed that the primary response causing marginal bone loss is due to bacterial action. In reality, bacterial actions are secondary to an imbalance of the innate immune system caused by the combination of titanium implants and ligatures, ie, nonself. This immunologic imbalance may lead to marginal bone resorption even in the absence of bacteria. CONCLUSION: Marginal bone loss and imminent oral implant failure cannot be properly analyzed without a clear understanding of immunologically caused tissue responses.
|
|
| 2. |
- Albrektsson, Tomas, 1945, et al.
(författare)
-
Implications of considering peri-implant bone loss a disease, a narrative review
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. - : Wiley. - 1523-0899 .- 1708-8208. ; 24:4, s. 532-543
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background Peri-implantitis has been suggested to cause significant increasing proportions of implant failure with increasing time. Purpose To assess whether implant failure rates in long term studies are matching the supposed high prevalence of peri-implantitis. Material and Methods This paper is written as a narrative review of the long-term clinical investigations available in the literature. Results Some implant systems have seen unacceptable marginal bone loss figures with time coupled to increased implant failure rates, resulting in the withdrawal of these systems. The reasons for such mishap are generally unknown, with the exception of one system failure that was found to be due to improper clinical handling. Modern, moderately rough implant systems have functioned excellently over 10-15 years of follow up with minor problems with marginal bone loss and implant failure rates within a few per cent. Machined implants have functioned adequately over 20-30 years of follow up. Implant failures occur predominantly during the first few years after implant placement. No significant increase of implant failures has been observed thereafter over 20-30 years of follow up. Over the years of our new millennium, scientific and technical advances have allowed the discovery of numerous molecular pathways and cellular interactions between the skeletal and immune system promoting the development of the interdisciplinary field called osteoimmunology. Nowadays, this knowledge has not only allowed the emergence of new etiologic paradigms for bone disease but also a new dynamic approach on the concept of osseointegration and MBL around oral implants, re-evaluating our older disease oriented outlook. This facilitates at the same time the emergence of translational applications with immunological perspectives, scientific approaches based on omics sciences, and the beginning of an era of personalized dental implant therapy to improve the prognosis of oral implant treatment. Conclusions Oral implant systems have been found to function with very good clinical outcome over follow-up times of 20-30 years. Registered implant failures have occurred predominantly during the first few years after implantation, and there has been no significant increase in late failures due to peri-implantitis.
|
|
| 3. |
- Albrektsson, Tomas, 1945, et al.
(författare)
-
Osteoimmune regulation underlies oral implant osseointegration and its perturbation
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Frontiers in Immunology. - : Frontiers Media SA. - 1664-3224. ; 13
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In the field of biomaterials, an endosseous implant is now recognized as an osteoimmunomodulatory but not bioinert biomaterial. Scientific advances in bone cell biology and in immunology have revealed a close relationship between the bone and immune systems resulting in a field of science called osteoimmunology. These discoveries have allowed for a novel interpretation of osseointegration as representing an osteoimmune reaction rather than a classic bone healing response, in which the activation state of macrophages ((M1-M2 polarization) appears to play a critical role. Through this viewpoint, the immune system is responsible for isolating the implant biomaterial foreign body by forming bone around the oral implant effectively shielding off the implant from the host bone system, i.e. osseointegration becomes a continuous and dynamic host defense reaction. At the same time, this has led to the proposal of a new model of osseointegration, the foreign body equilibrium (FBE). In addition, as an oral wound, the soft tissues are involved with all their innate immune characteristics. When implant integration is viewed as an osteoimmune reaction, this has implications for how marginal bone is regulated. For example, while bacteria are constitutive components of the soft tissue sulcus, if the inflammatory front and immune reaction is at some distance from the marginal bone, an equilibrium is established. If however, this inflammation approaches the marginal bone, an immune osteoclastic reaction occurs and marginal bone is removed. A number of clinical scenarios can be envisioned whereby the osteoimmune equilibrium is disturbed and marginal bone loss occurs, such as complications of aseptic nature and the synergistic activation of pro-inflammatory pathways (implant/wear debris, DAMPs, and PAMPs). Understanding that an implant is a foreign body and that the host reacts osteoimmunologically to shield off the implant allows for a distinction to be drawn between osteoimmunological conditions and peri-implant bone loss. This review will examine dental implant placement as an osteoimmune reaction and its implications for marginal bone loss.
|
|
