| 1. |
- Cedergren Weber, Gustav, et al.
(författare)
-
The Impact of COVID-19 on Parkinson's Disease : A Case-Controlled Registry and Questionnaire Study on Clinical Markers and Patients' Perceptions
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0001-6314 .- 1600-0404. ; 2023
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease with motor and nonmotor symptoms. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).Objectives: To explore how COVID-19 affects motor, nonmotor, and general health aspects of PD and to map how PD patients perceive their change in symptoms since falling ill with COVID-19.Method: The study was descriptive, case-controlled, and based on both registry and questionnaire data. At baseline, the controls were matched on age, sex, and disease severity. Information on the severity of the disease, nonmotor symptoms, motor symptoms, and general health was retrieved from the Swedish Registry for PD. Registry data from a COVID-19 group (n=45) and a control group (n=73), as well as questionnaires from a COVID-19 group (n=24) and a control group (n=42), were compared.Results: We did not find that SARS-CoV-2 infection affects any major aspect of nonmotor symptoms, motor symptoms, general health, and perception of change in PD patients' post-COVID-19. Compared to controls, the COVID-19 group reported a more positive subjective experience of pain and quality of life and a perception of change post-COVID-19 regarding general motor function, sleep quality, and mood (all p<0.05).Conclusion: Although SARS-CoV-2 infection does not seem to affect PD symptoms in any major respect, the subjective experience of several aspects of life in PD patients might be slightly improved post-COVID-19 compared to a control group. The findings warrant further investigations due to the small sample size and possible survivorship bias.
|
|
| 2. |
- Cedergren Weber, Gustav, et al.
(författare)
-
Tumoral parkinsonism—Parkinsonism secondary to brain tumors, paraneoplastic syndromes, intracranial malformations, or oncological intervention, and the effect of dopaminergic treatment
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Brain and Behavior. - 2162-3279. ; 13:8
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: Secondary tumoral parkinsonism is a rare phenomenon that develops as a direct or indirect result of brain neoplasms or related conditions. Objectives: The first objective was to explore to what extent brain neoplasms, cavernomas, cysts, paraneoplastic syndromes (PNSs), and oncological treatment methods cause parkinsonism. The second objective was to investigate the effect of dopaminergic therapy on the symptomatology in patients with tumoral parkinsonism. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted in the databases PubMed and Embase. Search terms like “secondary parkinsonism,” “astrocytoma,” and “cranial irradiation” were used. Articles fulfilling inclusion criteria were included in the review. Results: Out of 316 identified articles from the defined database search strategies, 56 were included in the detailed review. The studies, which were mostly case reports, provided research concerning tumoral parkinsonism and related conditions. It was found that various types of primary brain tumors, such as astrocytoma and meningioma, and more seldom brain metastases, can cause tumoral parkinsonism. Parkinsonism secondary to PNSs, cavernomas, cysts, as well as oncological treatments was reported. Twenty-five of the 56 included studies had tried initiating dopaminergic therapy, and of these 44% reported no, 48% low to moderate, and 8% excellent effect on motor symptomatology. Conclusion: Brain neoplasms, PNSs, certain intracranial malformations, and oncological treatments can cause parkinsonism. Dopaminergic therapy has relatively benign side effects and may relieve motor and nonmotor symptomatology in patients with tumoral parkinsonism. Dopaminergic therapy, particularly levodopa, should therefore be considered in patients with tumoral parkinsonism.
|
|
| 3. |
- Grigoriou, Sotirios, et al.
(författare)
-
Comparison of dyskinesia profiles after L-DOPA dose challenges with or without dopamine agonist coadministration
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Neuropharmacology. - 0028-3908. ; 237
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Many patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experiencing L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia (LID) receive adjunct treatment with dopamine agonists, whose functional impact on LID is unknown. We set out to compare temporal and topographic profiles of abnormal involuntary movements (AIMs) after L-DOPA dose challenges including or not the dopamine agonist ropinirole. Twenty-five patients with PD and a history of dyskinesias were sequentially administered either L-DOPA alone (150% of usual morning dose) or an equipotent combination of L-DOPA and ropinirole in random order. Involuntary movements were assessed by two blinded raters prior and every 30 min after drug dosing using the Clinical Dyskinesia Rating Scale (CDRS). A sensor-recording smartphone was secured to the patients' abdomen during the test sessions. The two raters’ CDRS scores were highly reliable and concordant with models of hyperkinesia presence and severity trained on accelerometer data. The dyskinesia time curves differed between treatments as the L-DOPA-ropinirole combination resulted in lower peak severity but longer duration of the AIMs compared with L-DOPA alone. At the peak of the AIMs curve (60–120 min), L-DOPA induced a significantly higher total hyperkinesia score, whereas in the end phase (240–270 min), both hyperkinesia and dystonia tended to be more severe after the L-DOPA-ropinirole combination (though reaching statistical significance only for the item, arm dystonia). Our results pave the way for the introduction of a combined L-DOPA-ropinirole challenge test in the early clinical evaluation of antidyskinetic treatments. Furthermore, we propose a machine-learning method to predict CDRS hyperkinesia severity using accelerometer data.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Löhle, Matthias, et al.
(författare)
-
Application of single wrist-wearable accelerometry for objective motor diary assessment in fluctuating Parkinson's disease
- 2023
-
Ingår i: npj Digital Medicine. - 2398-6352. ; 6:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by motor fluctuations including unpredictable oscillations remarkably impairing quality of life. Effective management and development of novel therapies for these response fluctuations largely depend on clinical rating instruments such as the widely-used PD home diary, which are associated with biases and errors. Recent advancements in digital health technologies provide user-friendly wearables that can be tailored for continuous monitoring of motor fluctuations. Their criterion validity under real-world conditions using clinical examination as the gold standard remains to be determined. We prospectively examined this validity of a wearable accelerometer-based digital Parkinson's Motor Diary (adPMD) using the Parkinson's Kinetigraph (PKG ®) in an alternative application by converting its continuous data into one of the three motor categories of the PD home diary (Off, On and Dyskinetic state). Sixty-three out of 91 eligible participants with fluctuating PD (46% men, average age 66) had predefined sufficient adPMD datasets (>70% of half-hour periods) from 2 consecutive days. 92% of per-protocol assessments were completed. adPMD monitoring of daily times in motor states showed moderate validity for Off and Dyskinetic state (ICC = 0.43-0.51), while inter-rating methods agreements on half-hour-level can be characterized as poor (median Cohen's κ = 0.13-0.21). Individualization of adPMD thresholds for transferring accelerometer data into diary categories improved temporal agreements up to moderate level for Dyskinetic state detection (median Cohen's κ = 0.25-0.41). Here we report that adPMD real-world-monitoring captures daily times in Off and Dyskinetic state in advanced PD with moderate validities, while temporal agreement of adPMD and clinical observer diary data is limited.
|
|
| 6. |
- Timpka, Jonathan, et al.
(författare)
-
Time to workforce exit after a Parkinsons disease diagnosis
- 2023
-
Ingår i: NPJ PARKINSONS DISEASE. - : NATURE PORTFOLIO. - 2373-8057. ; 9:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The impact of Parkinsons disease (PD) on workforce participation has received little attention even though demographic, lifestyle, and political changes together will result in an increased burden of PD on the working-age population. In this study, we investigate workforce survival after a PD diagnosis, as well as what demographic factors that are associated with workforce survival. As an exploratory outcome, we investigate workforce survival in persons with and without device-aided treatment (DAT). This is a nested case-cohort study based on Swedish national data from 2001-2016. Controls were matched on year of birth, sex, and municipality of residence. The used registers contain data on demographics, social insurance, in- and outpatient visits, filled drug prescriptions, and cause of death on the person-level. A total of 4781 persons with PD and 23,905 controls were included. The median survival until all-cause workforce exit was 43 months among persons that were workforce-active at the time of PD diagnosis, compared to 66 months in non-PD controls. Being female, >= 50 years old at diagnosis, or having a lower education were contributing factors to health-related workforce exit. Persons receiving DAT during follow-up exhibited shorter workforce survival than controls. However, this needs further investigation, particularly as patients have generally already left the workforce at the time for start of DAT. It is evident that PD has grave negative effects on workforce participation. Thus, supportive measures need to start at an early stage after diagnosis, and the development of new interventions is urgently needed.
|
|
