| 1. |
- Andersén, Heidi, et al.
(författare)
-
Influence of childhood exposure to a farming environment on age at asthma diagnosis in a population-based study
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Journal of Asthma and Allergy. - : Dove Press. - 1178-6965. ; 14, s. 1081-1091
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose: Asthma is a heterogeneous disease, and factors associated with different asthma phenotypes are poorly understood. Given the higher prevalence of farming exposure and late diagnosis of asthma in more rural Western Finland as compared with the capital of Helsinki, we investigated the relationship between childhood farming environment and age at asthma diagnosis.Methods: A cross-sectional population-based study was carried out with subjects aged 20– 69 years in Western Finland. The response rate was 52.5%. We included 3864 participants, 416 of whom had physician-diagnosed asthma at a known age and with data on the childhood environment. The main finding was confirmed in a similar sample from Helsinki. Participants were classified as follows with respect to asthma diagnosis: early diagnosis (0– 11 years), intermediate diagnosis (12–39 years), and late diagnosis (40–69 years).Results: The prevalence of asthma was similar both without and with childhood exposure to a farming environment (11.7% vs 11.3%). Allergic rhinitis, family history of asthma, ex-smoker, occupational exposure, and BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 were associated with a higher like-lihood of asthma. Childhood exposure to a farming environment did not increase the odds of having asthma (aOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.87–1.40). It did increase the odds of late diagnosis (aOR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.12–4.69), but the odds were lower for early (aOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30–0.80) and intermediate diagnosis of asthma (aOR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.47–1.18).Conclusion: Odds were lower for early diagnosis of asthma and higher for late diagnosis of asthma in a childhood farming environment. This suggests a new hypothesis concerning the etiology of asthma when it is diagnosed late.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Tuomisto, Leena E, et al.
(författare)
-
Clinical value of bronchodilator response for diagnosing asthma in steroid-naïve adults.
- 2021
-
Ingår i: ERJ open research. - : European Respiratory Society (ERS). - 2312-0541. ; 7:4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Spirometry and testing for bronchodilator response have been recommended to detect asthma, and a bronchodilator response (BDR) of ≥12% and ≥200mL has been suggested to confirm asthma. However, the clinical value of bronchodilation tests in newly diagnosed steroid-naïve adult patients with asthma remains unknown. We evaluated the sensitivity of BDR in forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) as a diagnostic test for asthma in a real-life cohort of participants in the Seinäjoki Adult Asthma Study. In the diagnostic phase, 369 spirometry tests with bronchodilation were performed for 219 steroid-naïve patients. The fulfilment of each test threshold was assessed. According to the algorithm of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, we divided the patients into obstructive (FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) <0.70) and non-obstructive (FEV1/FVC ≥0.70) groups. Of the overall cohort, 35.6% fulfilled ΔFEV1≥12% and ≥200mL for the initial FEV1, 18.3% fulfilled ΔFEV1≥15% and ≥400 mL for the initial FEV1, and 36.1% fulfilled ΔFEV1≥9% of predicted FEV1 at least once. One-third (31%) of these steroid-naïve patients was obstructive (pre-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC <0.7). Of the obstructive patients, 55.9%, 26.5% and 48.5%, respectively, met the same thresholds. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, different thresholds recognised different kinds of asthma patients. In steroid-naïve adult patients, the current BDR threshold (ΔFEV1≥12% and ≥200mL) has low diagnostic sensitivity (36%) for asthma. In obstructive patients, sensitivity is somewhat higher (56%) but far from optimal. If the first spirometry test with bronchodilation is not diagnostic but asthma is suspected, spirometry should be repeated, and other lung function tests should be used to confirm the diagnosis.
|
|
