| 1. |
- Askling, Johan, et al.
(författare)
-
Cancer risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapies : does the risk change with the time since start of treatment?
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Arthritis and Rheumatism. - : Wiley. - 0004-3591 .- 1529-0131. ; 60:11, s. 3180-3189
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE:To determine the short-term and medium-term risks of cancer in patients receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFalpha) therapies that have proven effective in the treatment of chronic inflammatory conditions.METHODS:By linking together data from the Swedish Biologics Register, Swedish registers of RA, and the Swedish Cancer Register, we identified and analyzed for cancer occurrence a national cohort of 6,366 patients with RA who first started anti-TNF therapy between January 1999 and July 2006. As comparators, we used a national biologics-naive RA cohort (n = 61,160), a cohort of RA patients newly starting methotrexate (n = 5,989), a cohort of RA patients newly starting disease-modifying antirheumatic drug combination therapy (n = 1,838), and the general population of Sweden. Relative risks (RRs) were estimated using Cox regression analyses, examining overall RR as well as RR by time since the first start of anti-TNF therapy, by the duration of active anti-TNF therapy, and by the anti-TNF agent received.RESULTS:During 25,693 person-years of followup in 6,366 patients newly starting anti-TNF, 240 first cancers occurred, yielding an RR of 1.00 (95% confidence interval 0.86-1.15) versus the biologics-naive RA cohort, and similar RRs versus the other 2 RA comparators. RRs did not increase with increasing time since the start of anti-TNF therapy, nor with the cumulative duration of active anti-TNF therapy. During the first year following the first treatment start, but not thereafter, dissimilar cancer risks for adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab were observed.CONCLUSION:During the first 6 years after the start of anti-TNF therapy in routine care, no overall elevation of cancer risk and no increase with followup time were observed.
|
|
| 2. |
- Askling, Johan, et al.
(författare)
-
Time-dependent increase in risk of hospitalisation with infection among Swedish RA patients treated with TNF antagonists
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. - : BMJ. - 0003-4967 .- 1468-2060. ; 66:10, s. 1339-1344
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVES:The degree to which treatment with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists may be associated with increased risks for serious infections is unclear. An observational cohort study was performed using prospectively collected data from the Swedish Biologics Register (ARTIS) and other national Swedish registers.METHODS:First, in the ARTIS, all 4167 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients starting TNF antagonist treatment between 1999 and 2003 were identified. Secondly, in the Swedish Inpatient Register, all individuals hospitalised for any reason and who also carried a diagnosis of RA, between 1964 and 2003 (n = 44 946 of whom 2692 also occurred in ARTIS), were identified. Thirdly, in the Swedish Inpatient Register, all hospitalisations listing an infection between 1999 and 2003 were identified. By cross-referencing these three data sets, RRs for hospitalisation with infection associated with TNF antagonist treatment were calculated within the cohort of 44 946 RA patients, using Cox regression taking sex, age, geography, co-morbidity and use of inpatient care into account.RESULTS:Among the 4167 patients treated with TNF antagonists, 367 hospitalisations with infections occurred during 7776 person-years. Within the cohort of 44 496 RA patients, the RR for infection associated with TNF antagonists was 1.43 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.73) during the first year of treatment, 1.15 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.51) during the second year of treatment, and 0.82 (95% CI 0.62 to 1.08) for subjects remaining on their first TNF antagonist treatment after 2 years.CONCLUSION:Treatment with TNF antagonists may be associated with a small to moderate increase in risk of hospitalisation with infection, which disappears with increasing treatment duration.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Gunnarsson, Iva, et al.
(författare)
-
Histopathologic and clinical outcome of rituximab treatment in patients with cyclophosphamide-resistant proliferative lupus nephritis
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Arthritis and Rheumatism. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0004-3591 .- 1529-0131. ; 56:4, s. 1263-1272
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody directed against the CD20 marker of B cells. Because of its ability to deplete B lymphocytes, it has been suggested that the drug could be of benefit in B cell-dependent diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The purpose of this study was to investigate the histopathologic and clinical effects of combination treatment with rituximab and cyclophosphamide (CYC) in patients with CYC-resistant proliferative lupus nephritis.METHODS: Seven female patients with proliferative lupus nephritis were treated with rituximab in combination with CYC. Renal biopsies were performed before treatment and during followup. SLE activity was evaluated by the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group index. In 6 of the 7 patients, immunostaining of lymphocyte subpopulations in the renal tissue was performed before treatment and during followup.RESULTS: At 6 months of followup, significant clinical improvement was noted, with a reduction in SLEDAI scores (from a mean of 15 to 3), anti-double-stranded DNA antibody levels (from a mean of 174 IU/ml to 56 IU/ml), and anti-C1q antibody levels (from a mean of 35 units/ml to 22 units/ml). On repeat renal biopsy, improvement in the histopathologic class of nephritis occurred in a majority of patients, and a decrease in the renal activity index was noted (from 6 to 3). A reduction in the number of CD3, CD4, and CD20 cells in the renal interstitium was noted in 50% of the patients on repeat biopsy.CONCLUSION: At 6 months of followup, all patients had responded both clinically and histopathologically to combination therapy. For patients with proliferative lupus nephritis who fail to respond to conventional immunosuppressive therapy including CYC, combined treatment with rituximab and CYC may constitute a new treatment option.
|
|
| 6. |
- Jónsdóttir, Thorunn, et al.
(författare)
-
Treatment of refractory SLE with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide : clinical effects, serological changes, and predictors of response
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. - : HighWire Press. - 0003-4967 .- 1468-2060. ; 67:3, s. 330-334
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy, serological responses, and predictors of response in patients with severe and refractory systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide.METHODS: 16 patients entered a treatment protocol using rituximab plus cyclophosphamide. Disease activity was assessed by the SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) and by the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index.RESULTS: At six months follow up, mean SLEDAI values decreased significantly from (mean (SD)) 12.1 (2.2) to 4.7 (1.1). Clinical improvement (50% reduction in SLEDAI) occurred in all but three patients. All but one patient responded according to BILAG. Remission defined as SLEDAI <3 was achieved in nine of 16 patients. Isotype analysis of anti-dsDNA antibodies revealed preferential decreases of IgG and IgA, but not IgM. Higher absolute numbers of CD19+ cells at baseline were correlated with shorter depletion time (r = -0.6).CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients improved following rituximab plus cyclophosphamide. The differential downregulation of anti-DNA of the IgG and IgA but not the IgM isotypes supports the hypothesis that cells producing pathogenic autoantibodies are preferentially targeted by the treatment. The fact that greater absolute numbers of CD19+ cells at baseline predict a less impressive clinical and serological response suggests that more flexible dosing could be advantageous.
|
|
