SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Vitak B)
 

Search: WFRF:(Vitak B) > (2006) > Tumor size and brea...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Tumor size and breast cancer detection : What might be the effect of a less sensitive screening tool than mammography?

Duffy, S.W. (author)
Cancer Research UK Center for Epidemiology, Mathematics, and Statistics, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London, United Kingdom, Department of Cancer Screening, Cancer Research UK Center for Epidemiology, Mathematics, and Statistics, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom
Tabar, L. (author)
Mammography Department, Central Hospital, Falun, Sweden
Vitak, B. (author)
Östergötlands Läns Landsting,Avdelningen för radiologi US
show more...
Warwick, J. (author)
Cancer Research UK Center for Epidemiology, Mathematics, and Statistics, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London, United Kingdom
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2006
2006
English.
In: The Breast Journal. - 1075-122X .- 1524-4741. ; 12:SUPPL. 1
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • In some limited-resource areas, a state-of-the-art mammography program is not affordable. In such circumstances, one might consider a less resource-intensive, but also less sensitive screening tool such as clinical breast examination (CBE). We used data from the Swedish Two-County Trial to estimate the shift in tumor size resulting from invitation to mammographic screening. By postulating a lesser benefit of a less sensitive screening tool (CBE), particularly in terms of detecting very small tumors, we predicted its likely effect on tumor size distribution. In addition, using the observed association between tumor size and nodal status, and between tumor size and fatality, we predicted the likely benefit in terms of reductions in node-positive disease and in breast cancer mortality. An invitation to mammographic screening was associated with a 27% reduction in the number of node-positive tumors and a 31% reduction in the number of breast cancer deaths. We estimate that in the trial population, screening with CBE alone would have led to an 11% reduction in node-positive tumors and an 11% reduction in breast cancer deaths (approximately 42 deaths prevented per 1000 cases). Assuming instead a tumor size distribution typical of a limited-resource setting (70% of tumors are 30 mm at presentation), we estimate that screening with CBE alone would lead to a 13% reduction in node-positive tumors and a 12% reduction in breast cancer deaths (approximately 72 deaths prevented per 1000 cases). Thus, although the relative benefit of CBE is only slightly greater in the limited-resource setting, the absolute reduction in deaths per case is about 70% higher. Our findings suggest that a less sensitive tool might be expected to confer a breast cancer mortality reduction about half of that observed with mammography. © 2006 The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.

Keyword

Breast cancer
Clinical breast examination
Early detection
Mammography
Mortality
Screening
Tumor size
NATURAL SCIENCES
NATURVETENSKAP

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Duffy, S.W.
Tabar, L.
Vitak, B.
Warwick, J.
Articles in the publication
The Breast Journ ...
By the university
Linköping University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view