| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Waltman, Max
(författare)
-
Pornography : the politics of legal challenges
- 2021
-
Bok (refereegranskat)abstract
- This book offers a cutting-edge, cross-disciplinary analysis of how the explosive spread of pornography contributes to violence against women, including prostitution, while presenting a political and legal theory on how to stop it effectively. It guides the reader through fifty years of significant empirical research on the harms, including a vast array of different studies illuminating pornography’s powerful impact on men, a majority of whom consume it. A comparative analysis of legal challenges in Canada, Sweden, and the United States demonstrates why civil rights, not criminal laws, can empower those hurt, subordinated, and exploited while efficiently dismantling the sex industry, consistent with free speech guarantees.
|
|
| 5. |
- Waltman, Max, 1974-
(författare)
-
"Så kan vi åtala Onlyfans för koppleri"
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Parabol. - : Parabol. - 2004-7355. ; :4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- I USA har överlevare lämnat in stämningar mot Pornhub. Den svenska sexköpslagen erbjuder en unik möjlighet att kunna åtala också Onlyfans ägare för koppleri, eftersom uppsåt inte behöver bevisas. Även prenumeranterna kan åtalas för sexköp. Max Waltman förklarar hur lagen kan användas.
|
|
| 6. |
- Waltman, Max
(författare)
-
The Politics of Legal Challenges to Pornography : A Comparative Analysis
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender & Society. - 1943-1600. ; 35:1, s. 1-41
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Pornography production exploits social disadvantages, often while using prostituted people who have endured poverty, childhood sexual abuse, race and/or sex discrimination. Over time, consumers become more sexually aggressive, adopt more attitudes supporting gender-based violence, and buy more sex than non-consumers. This study finds that challenges to pornography’s harms will be more successful in democracies that better recognize substantive equality, and where the harmed groups’ perspectives and interests are centered in law. Civil rights appear more responsive and remedial than state-implemented criminal laws, with similar implications for other problems disproportionately affecting disadvantaged populations.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
