SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(van der Werf Hayo M. G.)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(van der Werf Hayo M. G.) > (2013) > Exploring variabili...

Exploring variability in methods and data sensitivity in carbon footprints of feed ingredients

van Middelaar, Corina Everarda (författare)
Wageningen University, The Netherlands
Cederberg, Christel, 1959 (författare)
RISE,SIK – Institutet för livsmedel och bioteknik
Vellinga, Th V. (författare)
Wageningen UR Livestock Research, The Netherlands
visa fler...
Van Der Werf, Hayo M. G. (författare)
INRA, France; Agrocampus Ouest, France
De Boer, Imke J. M. (författare)
Wageningen University, The Netherlands
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2012-10-30
2013
Engelska.
Ingår i: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0948-3349 .- 1614-7502. ; 18:4, s. 768-782
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Purpose: Production of feed is an important contributor to life cycle greenhouse gas emissions, or carbon footprints (CFPs), of livestock products. Consequences of methodological choices and data sensitivity on CFPs of feed ingredients were explored to improve comparison and interpretation of CFP studies. Methods and data for emissions from cultivation and processing, land use (LU), and land use change (LUC) were analyzed. Method: For six ingredients (maize, wheat, palm kernel expeller, rapeseed meal, soybean meal, and beet pulp), CFPs resulting from a single change in methods and data were compared with a reference CFP, i.e., based on IPCC Tier 1 methods, and data from literature. Results and discussion: Results show that using more detailed methods to compute N2O emissions from cultivation hardly affected reference CFPs, except for methods to determine leaching (contributing to indirect N2O emissions) in which the influence is about -7 to +12 %. Overall, CFPs appeared most sensitive to changes in crop yield and applied synthetic fertilizer N. The inclusion of LULUC emissions can change CFPs considerably, i.e., up to 877 %. The level of LUC emissions per feed ingredient highly depends on the method chosen, as well as on assumptions on area of LUC, C stock levels (mainly aboveground C and soil C), and amortization period. Conclusions: We concluded that variability in methods and data can significantly affect CFPs of feed ingredients and hence CFPs of livestock products. Transparency in methods and data is therefore required. For harmonization, focus should be on methods to calculate leaching and emissions from LULUC. It is important to consider LUC in CFP studies of food, feed, and bioenergy products.

Ämnesord

LANTBRUKSVETENSKAPER  -- Lantbruksvetenskap, skogsbruk och fiske -- Livsmedelsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES  -- Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries -- Food Science (hsv//eng)
NATURVETENSKAP  -- Geovetenskap och miljövetenskap (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Earth and Related Environmental Sciences (hsv//eng)
LANTBRUKSVETENSKAPER  -- Annan lantbruksvetenskap (hsv//swe)
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES  -- Other Agricultural Sciences (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Food Engineering
Carbon footprint
Feed ingredients
Feed production
Inventory data
Livestock products
Methods
Livsmedelsteknik

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy