| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Jönsson, Anna K, et al.
(författare)
-
Influence of refill adherence method when comparing level of adherence for different dosing regimens
- 2014
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0031-6970 .- 1432-1041. ; 70:5, s. 589-597
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To examine the impact of two methods when estimating refill adherence in patients using bisphosphonates with different dosing regimens. In the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register, 18,203 new users of bisphosphonates aged 18-85 years were identified between 1 July 2006 and 30 June 2007 and followed for a maximum of 2 years. The patients were categorised based on dosing regimen: one tablet daily, one tablet weekly, switching between these regimens, and other regimens. Refill adherence was estimated with Continuous measure of Medication Acquisition (CMA, adherent if CMA a parts per thousand yenaEuro parts per thousand 80 %) and the maximum gap method (adherent if gaps < 45 days). Differences in adherence between patients in the groups were assessed with logistic regression models controlling for confounding factors. The proportion of patients classified as adherent was higher using CMA compared with patients classified as adherent using the maximum gap method. Patients on one tablet weekly had significantly lower adherence compared with patients on one tablet daily in the main analyses of both methods (the maximum gap method: 73 % vs. 80 %; adjusted OR = 0.71; 95 % CI 0.57-0.89 and CMA: 84 % vs. 88 %, adjusted OR = 0.75; 95 % CI 0.57-0.99). Patients using the other two dosing regimens had significantly lower adherence compared with patients on one tablet daily using both methods. Choice of method has an impact on the estimates of refill adherence to bisphosphonates. Patients on one tablet weekly dosing had lower adherence compared with patients on one tablet daily dosing using both methods.
|
|
| 4. |
- Hellström, Lina, 1975-, et al.
(författare)
-
Clinical implementation of systematic medication reconciliation and review as part of the Lund Integrated Medicines Management model – impact on all cause emergency department revisits
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics. - : Hindawi Limited. - 0269-4727 .- 1365-2710. ; 37:6, s. 686-692
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- What is known and objective: Interventions involving medication reconciliation and review by clinical pharmacists can reduce drug-related problems and improve therapeutic outcomes. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of routine admission medication reconciliation and inpatient medication review on emergency department (ED) revisits after discharge. Secondary outcomes included the combined rate of post-discharge hospital revisits or death.Methods: This prospective, controlled study included all patients hospitalised in three internal medicine wards in a university hospital, between January 1 2006 and May 31 2008. Medication reconciliation on admission and inpatient medication review, conducted by clinical pharmacists in a multiprofessional team, were implemented in these wards at different times during 2007 and 2008 (intervention periods). A discharge medication reconciliation was undertaken in all the study wards, during both control and intervention periods. Patients were included in the intervention group (n=1216) if they attended a ward with medication reconciliation and review, whether they had received the intervention or not. Control patients (n=2758) attended the wards before implementation of the intervention. Results: No impact of medication reconciliation and reviews on ED revisits (hazard ratio [HR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-1.04) or event-free survival (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.88-1.04) was demonstrated. In the intervention group, 594 patients (48.8%) visited the ED, compared to 1416 (51.3%) control patients. In total, 716 intervention (58.9%) and 1688 (61.2%) control patients experienced any event (ED visit, hospitalisation or death). Because the time to a subsequent ED visit was longer for the control as well as the intervention groups in 2007 than in 2006 (p<0.05), we re-examined this cohort of patients; the proportion of patients revisiting the ED was similar in both groups in 2007 (p=0.608).What is new and conclusion: Routine implementation of medication reconciliation and reviews on admission and during the hospital stay did not appear to have any impact on ED revisits, rehospitalisations or mortality over six months' follow-up.
|
|
| 5. |
- Hellström, Lina, 1975-, et al.
(författare)
-
Errors in medication history at hospital admission: prevalence and predicting factors
- 2012
-
Ingår i: BMC Clinical Pharmacology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1472-6904. ; 12, s. Article ID: 9-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: An accurate medication list at hospital admission is essential for the evaluation and further treatment of patients. The objective of this study was to describe the frequency, type and predictors of errors in medication history, and to evaluate the extent to which standard care corrects these errors.Methods:A descriptive study was carried out in two medical wards in a Swedish hospital using Lund Integrated Medicines Management (LIMM)-based medication reconciliation. A clinical pharmacist identified each patient's most accurate pre-admission medication list by conducting a medication reconciliation process shortly after admission. This list was then compared with the patient's medication list in the hospital medical records. Addition or withdrawal of a drug or changes to the dose or dosage form in the hospital medication list were considered medication discrepancies. Medication discrepancies for which no clinical reason could be identified (unintentional changes) were considered medication history errors.Results: The final study population comprised 670 of 818 eligible patients. At least one medication history error was identified by pharmacists conducting medication reconciliations for 313 of these patients (47%; 95% CI 43-51%). The most common medication error was an omitted drug, followed by a wrong dose. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a higher number of drugs at admission (odds ratio [OR] per 1 drug increase = 1.10; 95% CI 1.06 - 1.14; p<0.0001) and the patient living in their own home without any care services (OR1.58; 95% CI 1.02 - 2.45; p = 0.042) were predictors for medication history errors at admission. The results further indicated that standard care by non-pharmacist ward staff had partly corrected the errors in affected patients by four days after admission, but a considerable proportion of the errors made in the initial medication history at admission remained undetected by standard care (OR for medication errors detected by pharmacists' medication reconciliation carried out on days 4 - 11 compared to days 0 - 1 = 0.52; 95% CI 0.30 - 0.91; p = 0.021).Conclusions: Clinical pharmacists conducting LIMM-based medication reconciliations have a high potential for correcting errors in medication history for all patients. In an older Swedish population, those prescribed many drugs seem to benefit most from admission medication reconciliation.
|
|
| 6. |
- Hughes, Carmel M, et al.
(författare)
-
Provision of pharmaceutical care by community pharmacists : a comparison across Europe
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Pharmacy World & Science. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0928-1231 .- 1573-739X. ; 32:4, s. 472-487
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective To investigate the provision of pharmaceutical care by community pharmacists across Europe and to examine the various factors that could affect its implementation. Methods A questionnaire-based survey of community pharmacies was conducted within 13 European countries. The questionnaire consisted of two sections. The first section focussed on demographic data and services provided in the pharmacy. The second section was a slightly adapted version of the Behavioral Pharmaceutical Care Scale (BPCS) which consists of three main dimensions (direct patient care activities, referral and consultation activities and instrumental activities). Results Response rates ranged from 10–71% between countries. The mean total score achieved by community pharmacists, expressed as a percentage of the total score achievable, ranged from 31.6 (Denmark) to 52.2% (Ireland). Even though different aspects of pharmaceutical care were implemented to different extents across Europe, it was noted that the lowest scores were consistently achieved in the direct patient care dimension (particularly those related to documentation, patient assessment and implementation of therapeutic objectives and monitoring plans) followed by performance evaluation and evaluation of patient satisfaction. Pharmacists who dispensed higher daily numbers of prescriptions in Ireland, Germany and Switzerland had significantly higher total BPCS scores. In addition, pharmacists in England and Ireland who were supported in their place of work by other pharmacists scored significantly higher on referral and consultation and had a higher overall provision of pharmaceutical care. Conclusion The present findings suggest that the provision of pharmaceutical care in community pharmacy is still limited within Europe. Pharmacists were routinely engaged in general activities such as patient record screening but were infrequently involved in patient centred professional activities such as the implementation of therapeutic objectives and monitoring plans, or in self-evaluation of performance.
|
|
| 7. |
- Lesén, Eva, 1982, et al.
(författare)
-
Is the level of patient co-payment for medicines associated with refill adherence in Sweden?
- 2014
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Public Health. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1101-1262 .- 1464-360X. ; 24:1, s. 85-90
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In the Swedish reimbursement scheme, the co-payment is based on the price of the product and decreases in a stepwise manner as the total accumulated co-payment increases. The aim of this study was to analyse how refill adherence in Sweden varies according to patient's co-payment level for medicines, with antiepileptic drug (AED) use as an example.
|
|
| 8. |
- Andersson Sundell, Karolina, 1978, et al.
(författare)
-
Factors associated with switching and combination use of antidepressants in young Swedish adults.
- 2013
-
Ingår i: International journal of clinical practice. - : Hindawi Limited. - 1742-1241 .- 1368-5031. ; 67:12, s. 1302-10
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Little is known on factors associated with switching and combination use of antidepressants. Our aim was to describe such use and to analyse the association with socioeconomic factors and level of care in Swedish adults aged 20-34years.
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Gyllensten, Hanna, 1979, et al.
(författare)
-
Cost of illness of patient-reported adverse drug events: a population-based cross-sectional survey.
- 2013
-
Ingår i: BMJ open. - : BMJ. - 2044-6055. ; 3:6
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To estimate the cost of illness (COI) of individuals with self-reported adverse drug events (ADEs) from a societal perspective and to compare these estimates with the COI for individuals without ADE. Furthermore, to estimate the direct costs resulting from two ADE categories, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and subtherapeutic effects of medication therapy (STE).
|
|
