SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-403249"
 

Search: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-403249" > Cervical cancer cas...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Cervical cancer case-control audit : Results from routine evaluation of a nationwide cervical screening program

Wang, Jiangrong (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Elfström, K. Miriam (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Andrae, Bengt (author)
Karolinska Institutet,Uppsala universitet,Centrum för klinisk forskning, Gävleborg,Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
show more...
Kleppe, Sara Nordqvist (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Ploner, Alexander (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Lei, Jiayao (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Dillner, Joakim (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Sundström, Karin (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Sparén, Pär (author)
Karolinska Institutet
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2019-06-03
2020
English.
In: International Journal of Cancer. - : WILEY. - 0020-7136 .- 1097-0215. ; 146:5, s. 1230-1240
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Our study used a refined case-control cervical cancer Audit framework to investigate effectiveness of cervical screening, with measures of three screening failures: irregular-participation, cervical cancer developed after cytological abnormalities and after normal screening results. The register-based study included 4,254 cervical cancer cases diagnosed in Sweden during 2002-2011, and 30 population-based controls per case. We used conditional logistic regression models to examine relative risks of cervical cancer in relation to screening participation and screening results in the past two screening rounds from 6 months before cancer diagnosis. We found that women unscreened in past two screening rounds showed four times increased risk of cervical cancer compared to women screened in time (OR = 4.1, 95% CI = 3.8-4.5), and women unscreened in the previous round but screened in the most recent round also showed a statistically significantly elevated risk (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.5-1.8). Women having abnormality in previous two rounds exhibited higher risk of cervical cancer compared to women screened with normal results, while having normal results in the subsequent round after the abnormality also yielded an increased risk (OR = 4.0, 95% CI = 3.2-5.1). Being screened with only normal results was associated with 89% risk reduction for squamous cell cancer, compared to women unscreened, but only 60% reduction for adenocarcinoma. Our findings emphasize the importance of routine participation in cervical screening and suggest that management of abnormalities, as well as sensitivity of the test, warrants improvement especially for preventing cervical adenocarcinoma. The Audit framework serves as routine evaluation model and the findings benchmark for future evaluation of changes in screening practice.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Cancer och onkologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Cancer and Oncology (hsv//eng)

Keyword

cervical screening
cytology
cervical cancer
prevention

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view