SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-490960"
 

Search: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-490960" > Studying Meals Beyo...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Studying Meals Beyond the Nature/Culture Dichotomy; or, Why Commensality Cannot Be Reduced to “Veneer Theory” Analysis

Neuman, Nicklas, 1987- (author)
Uppsala universitet,Institutionen för kostvetenskap
 (creator_code:org_t)
Örebro : Örebro universitet, 2023
2023
English.
In: Tore Wretman symposiet. - Örebro : Örebro universitet. - 9789187789809 - 9789187789816 ; , s. 40-41
  • Conference paper (other academic/artistic)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • This presentation introduces ideas that have been growing for about five years, finally leading to a submitted manuscript during the summer of 2022. The paper is an in-depth analysis of the social biology of why humans seem to have a more or less universal appeal to eat in groups. I call this “commensal attraction”, drawing on the sociological concept of commensality: the practice of eating together (Jönsson, Michaud, and Neuman 2021).The basics of the paper will be outlined, followed by an argument about what Frans de Waal famously called “veneer theory” in his discussion about human morality (de Waal, 2006). In short, veneer theory refers to a theoretical analysis that reduces human behaviors, preferences, values and so forth to no more than a sociocultural furnace with no foundation (at least not explicitly) in human evolution. For de Waal, the criticism was directed at moral philosophy that, to him, overlooked how the human capacity for moral judgment is a product of evolution, not a just a veneer of an exclusively human capacity for reason that allows us to depart from our “bad nature”.My argument is that the same holds for how we approach meals. If I am correct in thinking that commensal attraction is due, in part, to how shared meals manifest evolved human traits such as social learning, cooperation, ritualized behavior, and symbolic thinking, then veneer theory analyses are clearly insufficient. Eating in groups and generously sharing food is not a cultural taming of naturally egoistic urges to grab it for yourself and run. Both are equally natural and cultural aspects of what it is to be human.Referencesde Waal, Frans. 2006. Morally evolved: primate social instincts, human morality, and the riseand fall of “veneer theory”." In Primates and philosophers: how morality evolved.Stephen Macedo and Josiah Ober, eds. Pp. 1-58. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UniversityPress.Jönsson, Håkan, Maxime Michaud, and Nicklas Neuman. 2021. What is commensality?: acritical discussion of an expanding research field. International Journal ofEnvironmental Research and Public Health 18 (12):6235.

Subject headings

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Sociologi (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Sociology (hsv//eng)
NATURVETENSKAP  -- Biologi -- Evolutionsbiologi (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Biological Sciences -- Evolutionary Biology (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Kostvetenskap
Food, Nutrition and Dietetics

Publication and Content Type

vet (subject category)
kon (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Neuman, Nicklas, ...
About the subject
SOCIAL SCIENCES
SOCIAL SCIENCES
and Sociology
NATURAL SCIENCES
NATURAL SCIENCES
and Biological Scien ...
and Evolutionary Bio ...
Articles in the publication
Tore Wretman sym ...
By the university
Uppsala University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view