| 11. |
|
|
| 12. |
- Nohrstedt, Daniel, et al.
(författare)
-
Advocacy Coalition Politics and Strategies on Hydraulic Fracturing in Sweden
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Policy debates on hydraulic fracturing. - : Palgrave Macmillan. ; , s. 147-175
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This chapter depicts the politics of hydraulic fracturing in Sweden through the lens of the advocacy coalition framework (ACF). The objective is to describe how the hydraulic fracturing issue in Sweden escalated from being a non-issue in 2011 into a controversial public issue involving hundreds of actors three years later. We structure the analysis using concepts and assumptions derived from the ACF regarding advocacy coalition behavior in emergent policy subsystems. The chapter is organized around the questions relating to policy and coalition status as well as the propensity for change. By answering these questions, we seek to shed light on the dynamics of policy subsystem development. As our analysis will show, the case of hydraulic fracturing in Sweden is an example of an emergent policy subsystem.
|
|
| 13. |
- Nohrstedt, Daniel, 1974-
(författare)
-
Bonding and Bridging Relationships in Collaborative Forums Responding to Weather Warnings
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Weather, Climate, and Society. - : AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC. - 1948-8327 .- 1948-8335. ; 10:3, s. 521-536
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Collaborative forums involving multiple stakeholders responding to natural hazards are prevalent, yet there is little conclusive evidence of how stakeholders exchange information across such forums and how different patterns of information exchange influence forum goals. This study analyzes information exchange among representatives of 51 organizations across 50 collaborative forums in response to weather warnings in Sweden, 2011-15. Using coded transcripts from forum meetings, the study estimates exponential random graph models to document the prevalence of network configurations of organizations across these forums. The results show that actors avoid engaging in information exchanges within closed subgroups and that no specific type or organization was particularly active in exchanging information. The study suggests that the forum structures are consistent with short-term operational goals as well as the long-term objective of these forums to sustain collaboration over time. The study discusses potential explanations for these patterns and implications for forum performance in relation to natural hazards management.
|
|
| 14. |
- Nohrstedt, Daniel
(författare)
-
Collaborative Governance Regimes
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Public Administration. - : Wiley. - 0033-3298 .- 1467-9299. ; 94:4, s. 1157-1159
-
Recension (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 15. |
|
|
| 16. |
- Nohrstedt, Daniel, 1974-, et al.
(författare)
-
Do Floods Drive Crisis Mitigation Policy? : Evidence from Swedish Municipalities
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Geografiska Annaler. Series A, Physical Geography. - Chichester, West Sussex : Wiley-Blackwell. - 0435-3676 .- 1468-0459. ; 97:1, s. 109-122
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- It is well established that continuous development of local-level mitigation policy plans and actions increases the chances of effective responses to natural hazards. What is less well known is how and why policy development, including the scope and pace of changes in municipality crisis mitigation programs, varies across local-level crisis mitigation systems. Using survey data on municipality hazard mitigation policy in Sweden, this study documents patterns of policy development and explores candidate explanations. Special attention is devoted to floods, which present local managers with opportunities to learn and adjust local mitigation policies. To investigate floods along with other hazards as potential drivers for local mitigation policy, the study examines three approaches to policy development: external shocks, transformation without disruption, and regional diffusion. Overall, in this case, the transformation without disruption model and the regional diffusion model do better than the external shocks model. Important precursors of policy development include collaboration, learning and diffusion effects from events and policy adoption in nearby municipalities. The study demonstrates the value of a broader analytical approach to policy development, which takes into account the interplay between events, collaborative management, and learning.
|
|
| 17. |
- Nohrstedt, Daniel, et al.
(författare)
-
Do floods drive hazard mitigation policy? : Evidence from swedish municipalities
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Geografiska Annaler. Series A, Physical Geography. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0435-3676 .- 1468-0459. ; 97:1, s. 109-122
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- It is well established that continuous development of local-level mitigation policy plans and actions increases the chances of effective responses to natural hazards. What is less well known is how and why policy development, including the scope and pace of changes in municipality crisis mitigation programs, varies across local-level crisis mitigation systems. Using survey data on municipality hazard mitigation policy in Sweden, this study documents patterns of policy development and explores candidate explanations. Special attention is devoted to floods, which present local managers with opportunities to learn and adjust local mitigation policies. To investigate floods along with other hazards as potential drivers for local mitigation policy, the study examines three approaches to policy development: external shocks, transformation without disruption, and regional diffusion. Overall, in this case, the transformation without disruption model and the regional diffusion model do better than the external shocks model. Important precursors of policy development include collaboration, learning and diffusion effects from events and policy adoption in nearby municipalities. The study demonstrates the value of a broader analytical approach to policy development, which takes into account the interplay between events, collaborative management, and learning.
|
|
| 18. |
- Nohrstedt, Daniel, 1974-
(författare)
-
Does Adaptive Capacity Influence Service Delivery? : Evidence from Swedish Emergency Management Collaborations
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Public Management Review. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1471-9037 .- 1471-9045. ; 17:5, s. 718-735
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The relationship between adaptive capacity and collaborative performance is a central issue within public management research but has rarely been subjected to systematic empirical testing. Using survey data on emergency preparedness collaborations in Swedish municipalities (N = 263), this article investigates the relationship between three adaptive capacity variables – diversity, interaction, and learning – and outcomes in terms of goal attainment, risk analysis, and public satisfaction with rescue services. The findings suggest a positive relationship between the number of collaboration partners and goal attainment, while learning and accessibility of collaboration venues were unassociated with service delivery variables.
|
|
| 19. |
- Nohrstedt, Daniel, 1974-
(författare)
-
Explaining Mobilization and Performance of Collaborations in Routine Emergency Management
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Administration & Society. - London : Sage Publications. - 0095-3997 .- 1552-3039. ; 48:2, s. 135-162
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Researchers as well as practitioners often elevate collaborative governance as a necessary condition for effective responses to extreme events. This research has a dominating focus on large-scale catastrophes and disasters, whereas little attention is devoted to less serious emergencies. Another void concerns performance measurement. Addressing these gaps, this study investigates plausible explanations for collaborative activity and outcomes in response to extreme winter conditions in Sweden. Analysis of a survey of Swedish public managers suggests that, in this case, collaborative action is associated with preparatory actions and disruptions affecting other organizations. The analysis generates conflicting findings regarding underlying explanations for collaborative outcomes.
|
|
| 20. |
|
|
