| 21. |
- Gyldenkerne, Christine, et al.
(författare)
-
Coronary Artery Lesion Lipid Content and Plaque Burden in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients : PROSPECT II
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Circulation. - : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 0009-7322 .- 1524-4539. ; 147:6, s. 469-481
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes have increased rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). We hypothesized that this is explained by diabetes-associated differences in coronary plaque morphology and lipid content.METHODS: In PROSPECT II (Providing Regional Observations to Study Predictors of Events in the Coronary Tree), 898 patients with acute myocardial infarction with or without ST-segment elevation underwent 3-vessel quantitative coronary angiography and coregistered near-infrared spectroscopy and intravascular ultrasound imaging after successful percutaneous coronary intervention. Subsequent MACEs were adjudicated to either treated culprit lesions or untreated nonculprit lesions. This substudy stratified patients by diabetes status and assessed baseline culprit and nonculprit prevalence of high-risk plaque characteristics defined as maximum plaque burden ≥70% and maximum lipid core burden index ≥324.7. Separate covariate-adjusted multivariable models were performed to identify whether diabetes was associated with nonculprit lesion-related MACEs and high-risk plaque characteristics.RESULTS: Diabetes was present in 109 of 898 patients (12.1%). During a median 3.7-year follow-up, MACEs occurred more frequently in patients with versus without diabetes (20.1% versus 13.5% [odds ratio (OR), 1.94 (95% CI, 1.14-3.30)]), primarily attributable to increased risk of myocardial infarction related to culprit lesion restenosis (4.3% versus 1.1% [OR, 3.78 (95% CI, 1.12-12.77)]) and nonculprit lesion-related spontaneous myocardial infarction (9.3% versus 3.8% [OR, 2.74 (95% CI, 1.25-6.04)]). However, baseline prevalence of high-risk plaque characteristics was similar for patients with versus without diabetes concerning culprit (maximum plaque burden ≥70%: 90% versus 93%, P=0.34; maximum lipid core burden index ≥324.7: 66% versus 70%, P=0.49) and nonculprit lesions (maximum plaque burden ≥70%: 23% versus 22%, P=0.37; maximum lipid core burden index ≥324.7: 26% versus 24%, P=0.47). In multivariable models, diabetes was associated with MACEs in nonculprit lesions (adjusted OR, 2.47 [95% CI, 1.21-5.04]) but not with prevalence of high-risk plaque characteristics (adjusted OR, 1.21 [95% CI, 0.86-1.69]).CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with recent myocardial infarction, both treated and untreated lesions contributed to the diabetes-associated ≈2-fold increased MACE rate during the 3.7-year follow-up. Diabetes-related plaque characteristics that might underlie this increased risk were not identified by multimodality imaging.
|
|
| 22. |
|
|
| 23. |
- Haeck, Joost D. E., et al.
(författare)
-
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Medical Therapy for Coronary Lesions With Positive Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) but Preserved Pressure-Bounded Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR): A Substudy of the Randomized Compare-Acute Trial
- 2021
-
Ingår i: JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY. - 1042-3931 .- 1557-2501. ; 33:7, s. E557-E564
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives. Performing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for fractional flow reserve (FFR) positive coronary lesions improves clinical outcomes and is recommended by international guidelines. It has been hypothesized that lesions with a positive FFR but a preserved coronary flow reserve (CFR) are less likely to be flow limiting and might best be treated medically. We investigated the association of CFR in FFR-positive lesions with clinical outcomes when treated medically, as well as the treatment effect of PCI vs medical therapy in FFR-positive lesions and a preserved CFR. Methods. We performed a substudy of the randomized, multicenter Compare-Acute trial, in which stabilized ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with non-culprit lesions were randomized to either FFR-guided PCI or medical therapy. Based on baseline and hyperemic pressure gradients, we computed physiologic limits of CFR, the so-called pressure-bounded CFR (pb-CFR), and classified lesions as low (<2) or preserved (>= 2). The primary endpoint was 12-month major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) rate, defined as a composite of death from any cause, non-fatal myocardial infarction, revascularization, or cerebrovascular events. Results. A total of 980 lesions from 885 patients were included in this substudy. In lesions with FFR <= 0.80, a total of 249 patients had a pb-CFR<2 and 29 patients had a preserved CFR (pb-CFR >= 2). The rate of MACCE at 1 year was not significantly different between patients with FFR <= 0.80 and pb-CFR <2 vs patients with FFR <= 0.80 and pb-CFR >= 2 (25% vs 17%, respectively; P=.39). Because of randomization, baseline characteristics were well balanced between patients with FFR <= 0.80 and pb-CFR >= 2 treated by either by PCI or medical therapy. Importantly, in patients with FFR <= 0.80 and pb-CFR >= 2, MACCE occurred more frequently in patients treated medically vs patients treated by PCI (44% vs 0%, respectively; P=.01). Conclusions. Preserved or low pb-CFR did not alter clinical outcomes in patients with a positive FFR. Patients with FFR-positive coronary lesions but a preserved CFR had more clinical events when treated medically vs those treated with PCI.
|
|
| 24. |
|
|
| 25. |
- Herlitz, Johan, et al.
(författare)
-
Is pre-hospital treatment of chest pain optimal in acute coronary syndrome? Both relief of pain and anxiety are needed
- 2011
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Cardiology. - : Elsevier Ireland Ltd. - 0167-5273 .- 1874-1754. ; 149:2, s. 147-151
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background Many patients who suffer from acute chest pain are transported by ambulance. It is not known how often treatment prior to hospital admission is optimal and how optimal pain-relieving treatment is defined. It is often difficult to delineate pain from anxiety. Aim To describe various aspects of chest pain in the pre-hospital setting with the emphasis on a) treatment and b) presumed acute coronary syndrome. Methods In the literature search, we used PubMed and the appropriate key words. We included randomised clinical trials and observational studies. Results Four types of drug appear to be preferred: 1) narcotic analgesics, 2) nitrates, 3) beta-blockers and 4) benzodiazepines. Among narcotic analgesics, morphine has been associated with the relief of pain at the expense of side-effects. Alfentanil was reported to produce more rapid pain relief. Nitrates have been associated with the relief of pain with few side-effects. Beta-blockers have been reported to increase the relief of pain when added to morphine. The combination of beta-blockers and morphine has been reported to be as effective as beta-blockers alone in pain relief, but this combination therapy was associated with more side-effects. Experience from anxiety-relieving drugs such as benzodiazepines is limited. It is not known how these 4 drugs should be combined. The results indicate that various pain-relieving treatments might modify the disease. Conclusion Our knowledge of the optimal treatment of chest pain and associated anxiety in the pre-hospital setting is insufficient. Recommendations from existing guidelines are limited. Large randomised clinical trials are warranted.
|
|
| 26. |
|
|
| 27. |
- Jernberg, T., et al.
(författare)
-
Long-Term Effects of Oxygen Therapy on Death or Hospitalization for Heart Failure in Patients With Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Circulation. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 0009-7322 .- 1524-4539. ; 138:24, s. 2754-2762
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: In the DETO2X-AMI trial (Determination of the Role of Oxygen in Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction), we compared supplemental oxygen with ambient air in normoxemic patients presenting with suspected myocardial infarction and found no significant survival benefit at 1 year. However, important secondary end points were not yet available. We now report the prespecified secondary end points cardiovascular death and the composite of all-cause death and hospitalization for heart failure. METHODS: In this pragmatic, registry-based randomized clinical trial, we used a nationwide quality registry for coronary care for trial procedures and evaluated end points through the Swedish population registry (mortality), the Swedish inpatient registry (heart failure), and cause of death registry (cardiovascular death). Patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction and oxygen saturation of >= 90% were randomly assigned to receive either supplemental oxygen at 6 L/min for 6 to 12 hours delivered by open face mask or ambient air. RESULTS: A total of 6629 patients were enrolled. Acute heart failure treatment, left ventricular systolic function assessed by echocardiography, and infarct size measured by high-sensitive cardiac troponin T were similar in the 2 groups during the hospitalization period. All-cause death or hospitalization for heart failure within 1 year after randomization occurred in 8.0% of patients assigned to oxygen and in 7.9% of patients assigned to ambient air (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.84-1.18; P=0.92). During long-term follow-up (median [range], 2.1 [1.0-3.7] years), the composite end point occurred in 11.2% of patients assigned to oxygen and in 10.8% of patients assigned to ambient air (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.88-1.17; P=0.84), and cardiovascular death occurred in 5.2% of patients assigned to oxygen and in 4.8% assigned to ambient air (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.87-1.33; P=0.52). The results were consistent across all predefined subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of supplemental oxygen in normoxemic patients with suspected myocardial infarction was not found to reduce the composite of all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure, or cardiovascular death within 1 year or during long-term follow-up.
|
|
| 28. |
- Kedhi, Elvin, et al.
(författare)
-
Clinical Impact of Second-Generation Everolimus-Eluting Stent Compared With First-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Diabetes Mellitus Patients Insights From a Nationwide Coronary Intervention Register
- 2012
-
Ingår i: JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. - : Elsevier BV. - 1876-7605 .- 1936-8798. ; 5:11, s. 1141-1149
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives This study sought to study the second-generation everolimus-eluting stent (EES) as compared with first-generation sirolimus-eluting (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients. Background There are limited data available comparing clinical outcomes in this setting with EES and SES, whereas studies comparing EES with PES are not powered for low-frequency endpoints. Methods All DM patients treated with EES, PES, or SES from January 18, 2007, to July 29, 2011, from the SCAAR (Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registery) were included. The EES was compared with SES or PES for the primary composite endpoint of clinically driven detected restenosis, definite stent thrombosis (ST), and all-cause mortality. Results In 4,751 percutaneous coronary intervention-treated DM patients, 8,134 stents were implanted (EES = 3,928, PES = 2,836, SES = 1,370). The EES was associated with significantly lower event rates compared with SES (SES vs. EES hazard ratio [HR]: 1.99; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.19 to 3.08). The same was observed when compared with PES (PES vs. EES HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 0.93 to 1.91) but did not reach statistical significance. These results were mainly driven by lower incidence of ST (SES vs. EES HR: 2.87; 95% CI: 1.08 to 7.61; PES vs. EES HR: 1.74, 95% CI: 0.82 to 3.71) and mortality (SES vs. EES HR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.03 to 3.98; PES vs. EES HR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.06 to 2.72). No significant differences in restenosis rates were observed between EES and SES or PES (SES vs. EES HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.77 to 2.08; PES vs. EES HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.71 to 1.55). Conclusions In all-comer DM patients the use of EES was associated with improved outcomes compared with SES and PES mainly driven by lower rates of ST and mortality. These results suggest better safety rather than efficacy with EES when compared with SES or PES. (J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2012;5:1141-9) (C) 2012 by the American College of DM
|
|
| 29. |
|
|
| 30. |
- Omerovic, E., et al.
(författare)
-
Impact of COVID-19 pandemics on the incidence and mortality in Takotsubo syndrome : a report from Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry
- 2023
-
Ingår i: European Heart Journal. - : Oxford University Press. - 0195-668X .- 1522-9645. ; 44:Suppl. 2
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in severe psychological, social, and economic stress. Countries applied different anti-pandemic strategies that substantially impacted citizens' psychosocial stress and health. Takotsubo syndrome (TS) is frequently triggered by emotional stress. Previous studies from the USA have reported a severalfold increase in TS incidence during pandemics.Purpose: To determine the incidence and outcomes of TS in Sweden before (2015-March 2020) and during (April 2020-December 2022) the pandemic.Methods: We assessed the incidence rate ratio (IRR) for all patients with TS referred for coronary angiography in Sweden using the nationwide Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) before and during the pandemic were calculated with Poisson regression adjusted for age and sex. We evaluated mortality with multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, which accounted for clustering of patients within hospitals. The following variables were used for adjustment: age, sex, diabetes, smoking status, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, previous myocardial infarction, and Killip class.Results: We identified 3,180 patients (2,128 [76.0%] women) hospitalized with TS during the study period; 2,189 (69%) pre-pandemic and 991 (31%) during the pandemic. The average age was 68.3 ± 11.2 years. The median follow-up time was 1250 days (IQR 562-1995). The crude all-cause mortality rate was 2.57% at 30 days and 15.5% after long-term follow-up. The incidence of TS was 11% lower during the pandemic compared with the pre-pandemic period (IRR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.98, P=0.009, Fig. 1). We found no difference in 30-day mortality (adjusted HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.69-1.78, P= 0.642) or long-term mortality (adjusted HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.73-1.28, P= 0.816) among patients with TS between the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. When only data after 2016 are used, we found no difference in TS incidence (IRR 1.00, 95% CI 0.92-1.08, P=1.00).Conclusions: In this observational study, the incidence of TS was lower during than before the pandemic but mortality was unchanged. The lower incidence of TS could be related to the specific anti-pandemic strategies applied at the national level in Sweden.
|
|
