| 51. |
- Smith, H. G., et al.
(författare)
-
Variations in the definition and perceived importance of positive resection margins in patients with colorectal cancer - an EYSAC international survey
- 2023
-
Ingår i: EJSO. - 0748-7983 .- 1532-2157. ; 49:11
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: Microscopically positive resection margins (R1) are associated with poorer outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. However, different definitions of R1 margins exist. It is unclear to what extent the definitions used in everyday clinical practice differ within and between nations. This study sought to investigate variations in the definition of R1 margins in colorectal cancer and the importance of margin status in clinical decision-making.Materials and methods: A 14-point survey was developed by members of The European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO) Youngs Surgeons and Alumni Club (EYSAC) Research Academy targeting all members of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) treating patients with colorectal cancer. The survey was distributed on social media, in ESSO's monthly newsletter and via national societies.Results: In total, 137 responses were received. Most respondents were from Europe (89.7%), with the majority from Denmark (56.9%). Less than 2/3 of respondents defined R1 margins as the presence of viable cancer cells <= 1 mm of the margin. Only 60% reported that subdivisions of R1 margins (primary tumour vs tumour deposit vs metastatic lymph node) are routinely available. More than 20% of respondents reported that pathology reports are not routinely reviewed at MDT meetings. Less than half of respondents considered margin status in decisionmaking for type and duration of adjuvant chemotherapy in Stage III colon cancer.Conclusion: The definitions and perceived clinical importance of microscopically positive margins in patients with colorectal cancer appear to vary. Adoption of an international dataset for pathology reporting may help to standardise current practices.
|
|
| 52. |
- Soucisse, Mikael L., et al.
(författare)
-
Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with or without early post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for appendix neoplasms with peritoneal metastases : A propensity score analysis
- 2021
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : Elsevier. - 0748-7983 .- 1532-2157. ; 47:1, s. 157-163
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: Early post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) can be used after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with resectable peritoneal metastases (PM). Whether EPIC adds any benefit is debatable.Methods: We performed a retrospective case-control analysis of patients with PM of appendiceal origin treated by CRS + HIPEC +/- EPIC at Uppsala University Hospital between 2004 and 2012. The 206 patients were divided into two groups depending on if they received EPIC or not. The two groups were propensity-matched with a 1:1 ratio. The patients in the EPIC group were mostly operated in the first three years of the unit's experience.Results: After matching, 76 patients were left in each group. The groups were similar, except for the proportion of histological subtypes (p = 0.021) and chemotherapy agents used for HIPEC (0.017). Survival outcomes were stratified by histology. The patients who received EPIC had a longer hospital and ICU length of stay (15.71 vs 14.28 days, p = 0.049), (1.45 vs 1.05 days, p = 0.002), respectively. Post-operative complications were similar in both groups. Overall Survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) did not differ for the patients with low-grade histology. The patients with high-grade tumors who received EPIC had a significantly worse OS (p = 0.0088) while having the same RFS as the patients who did not receive EPIC.Conclusion: Our results suggest there is no benefit of EPIC in patients with advanced appendiceal tumors while increasing hospital and ICU length of stays. A suboptimal group matching might influence our results. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
|
|
| 53. |
|
|
| 54. |
|
|
| 55. |
|
|
| 56. |
- Sundén, Marcus, et al.
(författare)
-
Surgical treatment of breast cancer liver metastases - A nationwide registry-based case control study
- 2020
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0748-7983 .- 1532-2157. ; 46:6, s. 1006-1012
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: The benefit of liver resection or ablation for breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) remains unclear. The aim of the study was to determine survival after isolated BCLM in nationwide cohorts and compare surgical versus systemic treatment regimens. Materials and methods: The Swedish register for cancer in the liver and the bile ducts (SweLiv) and the National register for breast cancer (NBCR) was studied to identify patients with 1–5 BCLM without extrahepatic spread diagnosed 2009–2016. Data from the registers were validated and completed by review of medical records. A Kaplan-Meier plot and log rank test were used to analyse survival. Prognostic and predictive factors were evaluated by Cox regression analysis. Results: A surgical cohort (n = 29) was identified and compared to a control cohort (n = 33) receiving systemic treatment only. There was no 90-day mortality after surgery. Median survival from BCLM diagnosis was 77 months (95% CI 41–113) in the surgical cohort and 28 months (95% CI 13–43) in the control cohort, (p = 0.004). There was a longer disease-free interval and more oestrogen receptor positive tumours in the surgical cohort. Surgery was a significant positive predictive factor in univariate analysis while a multivariable analysis resulted in HR 0.478 (CI 0.193–1.181, p = 0.110) for surgical treatment. Conclusion: Surgery for BCLM is safe and might provide a survival benefit in selected patients but prospective trials are warranted to avoid selection bias. © 2020
|
|
| 57. |
|
|
| 58. |
|
|
| 59. |
- Temmink, Sofieke J. D., et al.
(författare)
-
Complete response rates in rectal cancer: Temporal changes over a decade in a population-based nationwide cohort
- 2023
-
Ingår i: EJSO. - 0748-7983 .- 1532-2157. ; 49:11
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: In the past decade many changes in neoadjuvant treatment for patients with rectal cancer have taken place and are expected to impact complete response rates. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact on pathological, and overall, complete response rates in a nationwide population-based cohort, in relation to changes in neoadjuvant treatment and the start of a Watch & Wait (WoW) study. Materials and methods: A nationwide register study using prospectively collected data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Register between 2009 and 2020. Patients with rectal cancer stage I-III with a ypT0N0 in the resected specimen after neoadjuvant treatment and clinical complete responders from the yearly inclusion data of the national WoW study were included. Temporal changes in pathological and overall complete response rates were analysed, and differences in neoadjuvant treatment regimens over time and per region were studied.Results: Between 2009 and 2020 the pathological complete response rate for rectal cancer remained similar (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.091, p = 0.68) while the overall complete response rate increased significantly from 3.0% to 9.6% (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.818, p < 0.001). The pathological complete response rate for patients receiving short course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy was reduced by 50% after the introduction of the WoW study.Conclusions: During the studied time period the overall complete response rate increased significantly presumably due to changes in national neoadjuvant treatment regimens. Since the start of the national WoW study clinical complete response seem to partly replace pathological complete response.
|
|
| 60. |
|
|
