1. |
- Arveklev, Susanna H., 1975, et al.
(författare)
-
Learning About Conflict and Conflict Management Through Drama in Nursing Education
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Journal of Nursing Education. - New York : SLACK, Inc.. - 0148-4834 .- 1938-2421. ; 57:4, s. 209-216
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: In the health care settings in which nurses work, involvement in some form of conflict is inevitable. The ability to manage conflicts is therefore necessary for nursing students to learn during their education. Method: A qualitative analysis of 43 written group assignments was undertaken using a content analysis approach. Results: Three main categories emerged in the analysis-to approach and integrate with the theoretical content, to step back and get an overview, and to concretize and practicetogether with the overall theme, to learn by oscillating between closeness and distance. Conclusion: Learning about conflict and conflict management through drama enables nursing students to form new knowledge by oscillating between closeness and distance, to engage in both the fictional world and the real world at the same time. This helps students to form a personal understanding of theoretical concepts and a readiness about how to manage future conflicts.
|
|
2. |
- Georg, Carina, et al.
(författare)
-
A Rubric to Assess Students' Clinical Reasoning When Encountering Virtual Patients
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Journal of Nursing Education. - : Slack Incorporated. - 0148-4834 .- 1938-2421. ; 57:7, s. 408-415
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Training with virtual patients has been proposed as a suitable learning activity to improve clinical reasoning skills for nursing students. However, published instruments with the capacity to assess students' reasoning process in the encounter with virtual patients are lacking.METHOD: Deductive and abductive analyses were used to adapt the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) to assess nursing students' clinical reasoning skills in the encounter with virtual patients. The new rubric's ability to capture nursing students' clinical reasoning processes was tested using deductive analysis and statistical analysis.RESULTS: A grading rubric for virtual patients, the vpLCJR, was developed. Cronbach's alpha showed .892, indicating good internal consistency.CONCLUSION: The rubric vpLCJR, which deconstructs aspects of clinical reasoning for both students and faculty members, can be used to clarify expectations, assess students' clinical reasoning process, and provide feedback for learning when nursing students encounter virtual patients. [J Nurs Educ. 2018;57(7):408-415.].
|
|