| 1. |
- Bringman, S, et al.
(författare)
-
Hernia repair: the search for ideal meshes
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1248-9204. ; 14:1, s. 81-87
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 2. |
- Dalenbäck, Jan, 1957, et al.
(författare)
-
Long-term follow-up after elective adult umbilical hernia repair: low recurrence rates also after non-mesh repairs.
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1248-9204. ; 17:4, s. 493-497
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to establish long-term outcome after elective adult umbilical hernia (AUH) repair. METHODS: Peri- and postoperative data considering all consecutive procedures at our institution during the time span from 1999 to 2009 were retrospectively gathered and followed by a questionnaire and, if needed, a clinical investigation in early 2011. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients (female/male 35%/65%) were operated, and 144/162 (89%) answers were gathered, mean follow-up time 70months; 77% were sutured, non-mesh repairs; 94% of all AUHs were smaller than 3cm; and 49% of the operations were performed under local anaesthesia. No perioperative complications were encountered. Five postoperative complications were encountered, two serious, both after mesh-based repairs. Wound infection rate (SSI) was low, 2/144 (1.4%). 7/144 (4.9%) recurrences were registered, none if mesh-based techniques were used, giving a recurrence rate of 6.3% in suture-based repairs, the difference, however, not statistically significant (p=0.141); 2% reported persistent pain at follow-up, 89% were overall satisfied with the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: AUH repair could be performed with low early and long-term complication rates, with low recurrence rates also after non-mesh repairs. A substantial cohort of patients will unnecessary be implanted with meshes if mesh-reinforced repairs should be used on a routine basis, that is, 16 surplus meshes to prevent one recurrence in the present study. We recommend a tailored approach to AUH repair: suture-based methods with defects smaller than 2cm and mesh-based repairs considered if larger than that.
|
|
| 3. |
- Emanuelsson, Peter, et al.
(författare)
-
Analysis of the abdominal musculo-aponeurotic anatomy in rectus diastasis : comparison of CT scanning and preoperative clinical assessment with direct measurement intraoperatively
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Hernia. - Paris : Springer. - 1265-4906 .- 1248-9204. ; 18:4, s. 465-471
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the consistency of agreement of two methods for measuring abdominal rectus diastasis (ARD), preoperative computed tomography (CT) scanning and preoperative clinical assessment were compared with direct measurement intraoperatively.METHODS: Fifty-five consecutive patients were retrieved from an ongoing prospective randomised trial comparing two operative techniques for the repair of ARD. All patients underwent a preoperative clinical assessment and CT scan, and the results were compared with intraoperative measurement of the ARD width. Agreement between methods was described with Bland-Altman plots (BA plots) and calculated using Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC).RESULTS: The median width of the diastasis was 4.0 cm in the upper midline and 3.0 cm in the lower midline for the intraoperative measurement. BA plots showed that measurements on CT and intraoperatively are not in agreement in the lower midline, whereas the agreement was stronger between the clinical and the intraoperative method. The CCC was higher for clinical vs. intraoperative measurement (0.479) than for CT vs. intraoperative measurement (-0.002) in the lower midline, although the agreement was over all low. CT scanning underestimated the width of the ARD when compared to 87 % of preoperative clinical assessments, and 83 % of intraoperative measurements. Preoperative clinical assessment overestimated ARD in 35 % when compared with intraoperative measurements.CONCLUSION: Clinical assessment prior to surgery provides more accurate information than CT scanning in the assessment of ARD width. CT scanning underestimates ARD width when compared with intraoperative measurement.
|
|
| 4. |
- Gunnarsson, Ulf, 1967-, et al.
(författare)
-
Assessment of abdominal muscle function using the Biodex System-4. Validity and reliability in healthy volunteers and patients with giant ventral hernia
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Hernia. - Paris : Springer. - 1265-4906 .- 1248-9204. ; 15:4, s. 417-421
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: The decrease in recurrence rates in ventral hernia surgery have led to a redirection of focus towards other important patient-related endpoints. One such endpoint is abdominal wall function. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reliability and external validity of abdominal wall strength measurement using the Biodex System-4 with a back abdomen unit.MATERIAL AND METHOD: Ten healthy volunteers and ten patients with ventral hernias exceeding 10 cm were recruited. Test-retest reliability, both with and without girdle, was evaluated by comparison of measurements at two test occasions 1 week apart. Reliability was calculated by the interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) method. Validity was evaluated by correlation with the well-established International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and a self-assessment of abdominal wall strength.RESULTS: One person in the healthy group was excluded after the first test due to neck problems following minor trauma. The reliability was excellent (>0.75), with ICC values between 0.92 and 0.97 for the different modalities tested. No differences were seen between testing with and without a girdle. Validity was also excellent both when calculated as correlation to self-assessment of abdominal wall strength, and to IPAQ, giving Kendall tau values of 0.51 and 0.47, respectively, and corresponding P values of 0.002 and 0.004.CONCLUSION: Measurement of abdominal muscle function using the Biodex System-4 is a reliable and valid method to assess this important patient-related endpoint. Further investigations will be made to explore the potential of this technique in the evaluation of the results of ventral hernia surgery, and to compare muscle function after different abdominal wall reconstruction techniques.
|
|
| 5. |
- Janson, A R, et al.
(författare)
-
Laparoscopic stoma formation with a prophylactic prosthetic mesh.
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Hernia. - : Springer. - 1265-4906 .- 1248-9204. ; 14:5, s. 495-498
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: One year after stoma formation with an open technique, the rate of parastomal hernia is almost 50%. The herniation rate can be reduced to 10% with the use of a prophylactic mesh in a sublay position. For stomas formed with a laparoscopic technique, a surgical method with the use of prophylactic mesh should be sought. METHODS: Patients with a sigmoidostomy created with a laparoscopic technique were provided with a prophylactic large-pore, low-weight mesh in a sublay position. Follow-up examination was carried out after at least 12 months. RESULTS: Between March 2003 and May 2007, a sigmoidostomy was created in 25 patients. The patients' mean age was 65 years (range 31-89), the mean body mass index was 26 (range 21-32) and 15 were female. One stoma necrosis and two minor wound infections occurred. Parastomal hernia was present in 3 of 20 patients (15%) available for follow-up examination after 11-31 months (mean 19). No fistulas or strictures had developed. No mesh infection was noted and no mesh was removed. CONCLUSION: In laparoscopic stoma formation, a prophylactic large-pore, low-weight mesh in a sublay position is an easy and safe procedure associated with a low rate of parastomal hernia.
|
|
| 6. |
- Johansson, M, et al.
(författare)
-
Different techniques for mesh application give the same abdominal muscle strength
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Hernia. - Paris : Springer. - 1265-4906 .- 1248-9204. ; 15:1, s. 65-68
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: This study investigates abdominal muscle strength after surgery for giant hernia with the onlay, sublay or intraperitoneal (IPOM) method. Theoretically, placement of the mesh may result in different possibilities regarding function and postoperative physical activity related to abdominal muscle function.METHOD: Twenty-four patients operated for large ventral hernias using the onlay, sublay or IPOM technique were evaluated 1 year following surgery for abdominal wall strength using Biodex system 4.RESULTS: Despite the different surgical techniques used, no differences were observed in abdominal wall strength between the groups.CONCLUSION: The postoperative strength of abdominal wall muscles is independent of the method used for reconstruction of large abdominal wall hernia, and the choice of surgical technique should be directed by anatomical circumstances.
|
|
| 7. |
- Jänes, Arthur, 1970-, et al.
(författare)
-
Parastomal hernia : clinical and radiological definitions
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Hernia. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1265-4906 .- 1248-9204. ; 15:2, s. 189-192
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- INTRODUCTION: Parastomal hernia is a frequent complication after stoma formation. No consistent definition of parastomal hernia has been used in previous studies using clinical examination or computed tomography (CT) scan. The correlation between herniation rates found with clinical examination and CT scan has been poor. A definition of parastomal hernia with clinical examination that correlates with findings from CT scan should be sought.METHODS: Parastomal hernia, was with surgeons' clinical examination, defined as any protrusion in the vicinity of the stoma with the patient straining in a supine and an erect position. A new CT scan method was developed with the patient examined in the prone position. Radiologists defined herniation as any intra-abdominal content protruding beyond the peritoneum or the presence of a hernia sac. The correlation between investigators and methods were estimated by calculating Fleiss' Kappa values.RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were assessed by three surgeons and three radiologists. For the surgeons, the Kappa value was 0.85. For the radiologists, it was 0.85 with CT scan in the prone position and 0.82 in the supine position. For the surgeons and radiologists collectively, the Kappa value was 0.80 for CT scan in the prone position and 0.63 in the supine position.CONCLUSION: With the new CT scan method examining patients in the prone position, the clinical and radiological definitions were highly reproducible and correlated strongly between methods and raters. With the strong correlation between clinical and radiological assessments, clinical examination alone is sufficient as follow-up. Conventional CT scan with the patient supine is not a reliable tool for diagnosing parastomal hernia.
|
|
| 8. |
- Kingsnorth, A, et al.
(författare)
-
Randomized controlled multicenter international clinical trial of self-gripping Parietex (TM) ProGrip (TM) polyester mesh versus lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: interim results at 3 months
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Hernia. - : Springer Verlag (Germany). - 1265-4906 .- 1248-9204. ; 16:3, s. 287-294
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To compare clinical outcomes following sutureless Parietex (TM) ProGrip (TM) mesh repair to traditional Lichtenstein repair with lightweight polypropylene mesh secured with sutures. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanThis is a 3-month interim report of a 1-year multicenter international study. Three hundred and two patients were randomized; 153 were treated with Lichtenstein repair (L group) and 149 with Parietex (TM) ProGrip (TM) precut mesh (P group) with or without fixation. The primary outcome measure was postoperative pain using the visual analog scale (VAS, 0-150 mm); other outcomes were assessed prior to surgery and up to 3 months postoperatively. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanCompared to baseline, pain score was lower in the P group at discharge (-10%) and at 7 days (-13%), while pain increased in the L group at discharge (+39%) and at 7 days (+21%). The difference between groups was significant at both time points (P = 0.007 and P = 0.039, respectively). In the P group, patients without fixation suffered less pain compared to those with single-suture fixation (1 month: -20.9 vs. -6.15%, P = 0.02; 3 months: -24.3 vs. -7.7%, P = 0.01). The infection rate was significantly lower in the P group during the 3-month follow-up (2.0 vs. 7.2%, P = 0.032). Surgery duration was significantly shorter in the P group (32.4 vs. 39.1 min; P andlt; 0.001). No recurrence was observed at 3 months in both groups. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanSurgery duration, early postoperative, pain and infection rates were significantly reduced with self-gripping polyester mesh compared to Lichtenstein repair with polypropylene mesh. The use of fixation increased postoperative pain in the P group. The absence of early recurrence highlights the gripping efficiency effect.
|
|
| 9. |
- Koch Frisén, Angelica, 1970-, et al.
(författare)
-
Analysis of outcome of Lichtenstein groin hernia repair by surgeons in training versus a specialized surgeon
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Hernia. - : Springer. - 1265-4906 .- 1248-9204. ; 15:3, s. 281-288
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose: Groin hernia repair is a common procedure in general surgery, and is taught to and performed by surgeons early in their training. The aim of this observational study was to compare hernia repair performance and results of surgical trainees with those of a specialized surgeon. The further aim sought to identify what factors may influence short and long-term outcome, and areas for improvement in surgical training. Methods: A non-randomized parallel cohort study was designed to compare a specialized surgeon with surgical trainees, performing the Lichtenstein repair in adult males. Two hundred repairs were included, of which 96 were performed by surgical trainees. Patient characteristics, surgical experience, and operative data including duration of procedural parts and surgical complexity were noted at surgery. Postoperative complications, recurrence, chronic pain and residual symptoms were assessed at longterm follow-up after a median of 34.5 months. Results: Surgical trainees had longer overall operative time consume, with an unproportionally longer time for mobilising the sac and cord. They perceived exposure and mobilisation as more difficult than the specialist, and also a greater demand on own experience during surgery. The trainee repairs had a higher rate of postoperative complications (14.7% versus 5.0%) but recurrence rate was the same as for specialist repairs. At long-term follow-up, specialist repairs had a higher symptom burden and more chronic pain. Conclusions: Comparison of a specialized surgeon to surgical trainees in performance and outcome for inguinal hernia surgery shows it was more efficient, but not necessarily better to let a specialized surgeon perform the repairs. The better long-term outcome for surgical trainees stands in contrast to the prejudice that it is better to have an experienced surgeon to perform standard procedures. It seems likely that targeted training in dissection and mobilisation could decrease level of perceived complexity and shorten operative time consume for surgical trainees. We believe that adequately supervised hernia surgery should remain as a part of the surgical training.
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
| 11. |
- Magnusson, Niklas, 1975-, et al.
(författare)
-
The time profile of groin hernia recurrences
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Hernia. - : Springer. - 1265-4906 .- 1248-9204. ; 14:4, s. 341-344
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: If the pathogeneses of the development of a recurrence varies following the different methods of hernia repair, the time required to develop a recurrence could be expected to vary. The aim of the study was to identify risk factors affecting the time interval between the primary repair and the reoperation.METHODS: Data from the Swedish Hernia Register were used. Each year of the 5-year follow-up period was treated as a separate subgroup and merged together into one large group. For each risk factor, we performed a Cox proportional hazard analysis, testing for interactions between the year and the risk factor, with reoperation as the endpoint.RESULTS: Altogether, 142,578 repairs were recorded, of which 7.7% were performed on women. The mean age of the cohort was 59 years. The overall recurrence rate in the 5-year period was 4.3%. Multivariate analysis showed that recurrence following surgery for recurrent hernia occurred relatively early (P < 0.05).Recurrence also appeared early if postoperative complications were registered (P < 0.05). Recurrence after suture repair or laparoscopic repair appeared relatively early compared to recurrence following open mesh repair (P < 0.05). In a separate analysis, a relatively higher risk for early recurrence was seen for all sutured repairs compared to all mesh repairs (P < 0.05).CONCLUSIONS: The pathogenesis behind the development of recurrence probably differs depending on the technique applied during the hernia repair. The higher proportion of early recurrences following laparoscopic repair, suture repair and recurrent repair may be explained by the high proportion of technical failures.
|
|
| 12. |
|
|
| 13. |
- Millbourn, Daniel, et al.
(författare)
-
Risk factors for wound complications in midline abdominal incisions related to the size of stitches
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Hernia. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1265-4906 .- 1248-9204. ; 15:3, s. 261-266
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Midline abdominal incisions should be closed continuously with a suture length (SL) to wound length (WL) ratio above 4 using small stitches. The effect on the rate of wound complications of a very high ratio and other potential risk factors when closure is performed with small stitches is unknown. METHODS: Patients operated on through a midline incision were randomised to closure with small stitches, placed 5-8 mm from the wound edge and less than 5 mm apart, or with large stitches, placed more than 1 cm from the wound edge. Patient and operative variables were registered. Surgical site infection and incisional hernia were recorded. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-one patients were randomised to closure with small stitches and 370 with large stitches. Infection and herniation were less common with small stitches. With small stitches, no risk factors for infection or herniation were identified. With large stitches, wound contamination and the patient being diabetic were independent risk factors for infection, and long operation time and surgical site infection were risk factors for herniation. A very high SL to WL ratio did not affect the complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: In midline abdominal incisions closed with small stitches, no risk factors for surgical site infection or incisional hernia were identified. Increasing the ratio very much above 4 had no adverse effects on the rate of wound complications. The higher rates of infection and herniation with an SL to WL ratio over 5 and in overweight patients in previous reports were probably related to wounds being closed with large stitches.
|
|
| 14. |
- Miserez, M., et al.
(författare)
-
Update with level 1 studies of the European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Hernia. - : Springer Berlin/Heidelberg. - 1265-4906 .- 1248-9204. ; 18:2, s. 151-163
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: In 2009, the European Hernia Society published the EHS Guidelines for the Treatment of Inguinal Hernia in Adult Patients. The Guidelines contain recommendations for the treatment of inguinal hernia from diagnosis till aftercare. The guidelines expired January 1, 2012. To keep them updated, a revision of the guidelines was planned including new level 1 evidence.METHODS: The original Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine ranking was used. All relevant level 1A and level 1B literature from May 2008 to June 2010 was searched (Medline and Cochrane) by the Working Group members. All chapters were attributed to the two responsible authors in the initial guidelines document. One new chapter on fixation techniques was added. The quality was assessed by the Working Group members during a 2-day meeting and the data were analysed, especially with respect to any change in the level and/or text of any of the conclusions or recommendations of the initial guidelines. In the end, all relevant references published until January 1, 2013 were included. The final text was approved by all Working Group members.RESULTS: For the following topics, the conclusions and/or recommendations have been changed: indications for treatment, treatment of inguinal hernia, day surgery, antibiotic prophylaxis, training, postoperative pain control and chronic pain. The addendum contains all current level 1 conclusions, Grade A recommendations and new Grade B recommendations based on new level 1 evidence (with the changes in bold).CONCLUSIONS: Despite the fact that the Working Group responsible for it tried to represent most kinds of surgeons treating inguinal hernias, such general guidelines inevitably must be fitted to the daily practice of every individual surgeon treating his/her patients. There is no doubt that the future of guideline implementation will strongly depend on the development of easy to use decision support algorithms tailored to the individual patient and on evaluating the effect of guideline implementation on surgical outcome. At the 35th International Congress of the EHS in Gdansk, Poland (May 12-15, 2013), it was decided that the EHS, IEHS and EAES will collaborate from now on with the final goal to publish new joint guidelines, most likely in 2015.
|
|
| 15. |
- Montgomery, Agneta, et al.
(författare)
-
The arcuate line hernia: operative treatment and a review of the literature.
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Hernia. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1248-9204 .- 1265-4906. ; 17:3, s. 391-396
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: An arcuate line hernia (ALH) is a rare diagnosis with no consensus on how to deal with this condition either when symptomatic or when found accidentally. Suggestions for laparoscopic and open operative techniques are given together with a review of the literature and a presentation of three new cases. MATERIAL: The PubMed database was searched for publications on ALH. Identified cases, including three from our department, are reported. RESULTS: Five males and two females, with a median age of 53 years were identified. Three patients were correctly diagnosed on a preoperative CT scan and the rest at surgery. Two patients had bilateral ALHs and four had other concomitant hernias repaired. Small bowel was present in the hernia in three cases and sigmoid colon in one. In one case, an emergency operation was performed due to bowel incarceration. Five patients had laparoscopic repairs, three with mesh and two without. Two patients, one converted from laparoscopic to open operation, had open mesh repairs. The postoperative course was uneventful in all cases, and no recurrences have been reported at a median follow-up of 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: A laparoscopic approach is recommended for diagnostic purposes, for pre-peritoneal mesh placement and for repair of concomitant hernias in both elective and emergency settings. Highlighting its existence might help general surgeons in interpreting an unusual finding on a CT scan or at operation.
|
|
| 16. |
|
|
| 17. |
- Muysoms, F. E., et al.
(författare)
-
Recommendations for reporting outcome results in abdominal wall repair
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Hernia. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1248-9204 .- 1265-4906. ; 17:4, s. 423-433
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- The literature dealing with abdominal wall surgery is often flawed due to lack of adherence to accepted reporting standards and statistical methodology. The EuraHS Working Group (European Registry of Abdominal Wall Hernias) organised a consensus meeting of surgical experts and researchers with an interest in abdominal wall surgery, including a statistician, the editors of the journal Hernia and scientists experienced in meta-analysis. Detailed discussions took place to identify the basic ground rules necessary to improve the quality of research reports related to abdominal wall reconstruction. A list of recommendations was formulated including more general issues on the scientific methodology and statistical approach. Standards and statements are available, each depending on the type of study that is being reported: the CONSORT statement for the Randomised Controlled Trials, the TREND statement for non randomised interventional studies, the STROBE statement for observational studies, the STARLITE statement for literature searches, the MOOSE statement for metaanalyses of observational studies and the PRISMA statement for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A number of recommendations were made, including the use of previously published standard definitions and classifications relating to hernia variables and treatment; the use of the validated Clavien-Dindo classification to report complications in hernia surgery; the use of "time-to-event analysis" to report data on "freedom-of-recurrence" rather than the use of recurrence rates, because it is more sensitive and accounts for the patients that are lost to follow-up compared with other reporting methods. A set of recommendations for reporting outcome results of abdominal wall surgery was formulated as guidance for researchers. It is anticipated that the use of these recommendations will increase the quality and meaning of abdominal wall surgery research.
|
|
| 18. |
- Muysoms, F., et al.
(författare)
-
EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Hernia. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1248-9204 .- 1265-4906. ; 16:3, s. 239-250
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Although the repair of ventral abdominal wall hernias is one of the most commonly performed operations, many aspects of their treatment are still under debate or poorly studied. In addition, there is a lack of good definitions and classifications that make the evaluation of studies and meta-analyses in this field of surgery difficult. Under the auspices of the board of the European Hernia Society and following the previously published classifications on inguinal and on ventral hernias, a working group was formed to create an online platform for registration and outcome measurement of operations for ventral abdominal wall hernias. Development of such a registry involved reaching agreement about clear definitions and classifications on patient variables, surgical procedures and mesh materials used, as well as outcome parameters. The EuraHS working group (European registry for abdominal wall hernias) comprised of a multinational European expert panel with specific interest in abdominal wall hernias. Over five working group meetings, consensus was reached on definitions for the data to be recorded in the registry. A set of well-described definitions was made. The previously reported EHS classifications of hernias will be used. Risk factors for recurrences and co-morbidities of patients were listed. A new severity of comorbidity score was defined. Post-operative complications were classified according to existing classifications as described for other fields of surgery. A new 3-dimensional numerical quality-of-life score, EuraHS-QoL score, was defined. An online platform is created based on the definitions and classifications, which can be used by individual surgeons, surgical teams or for multicentre studies. A EuraHS website is constructed with easy access to all the definitions, classifications and results from the database. An online platform for registration and outcome measurement of abdominal wall hernia repairs with clear definitions and classifications is offered to the surgical community. It is hoped that this registry could lead to better evidence-based guidelines for treatment of abdominal wall hernias based on hernia variables, patient variables, available hernia repair materials and techniques.
|
|
| 19. |
|
|
| 20. |
- Nilsson, Hanna, 1979-, et al.
(författare)
-
Mortality after groin hernia surgery : delay of treatment and cause of death
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Hernia. - Paris : Springer. - 1265-4906 .- 1248-9204. ; 15:3, s. 301-307
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Emergency hernia surgery, in contrast to elective hernia surgery, is associated with appreciable mortality. Incarcerated hernia is the second most common cause of small bowel obstruction after adhesions, and the leading cause of bowel strangulation.METHODS: Information on patients who died within 30 days of groin hernia surgery was retrieved from the Swedish Hernia Register, from the Cause-of-Death Register, and from hospital notes.RESULTS: Of 103,710 groin hernia operations between 1992 and 2004, 292 patients died within 30 days of surgery. Hospital notes and cause of death were retrieved for 242 cases (82%). In 5 of these patients, the hernia operation was done in addition to more urgent surgery and therefore excluded from further analyses; 152 patients were admitted as emergency cases and 55 of these patients underwent bowel resection. A total of 107 patients had signs of bowel obstruction when admitted. For 37% of these patients, physical examination of the groin was not documented. Patients with bowel obstruction without a note on a palpable groin lump were more likely to undergo imaging investigation preoperatively (P < 0.001) and they had an increased time to surgery compared to patients with a palpable lump. Women and patients with femoral hernia were significantly less likely to undergo a groin examination compared to other patients. Local anaesthesia was used in 7% of all patients who died postoperatively, and in 3% of emergency cases. Pulmonary disease, sepsis and malignant disease were more common as causes of death after emergency surgery than after elective surgery.CONCLUSIONS: Groin examination of patients presenting with bowel obstruction is of utmost importance in order to minimise delay to hernia surgery.
|
|
| 21. |
- Petersson, P., et al.
(författare)
-
Wound dehiscence: outcome comparison for sutured and mesh reconstructed patients
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Hernia. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1248-9204 .- 1265-4906. ; 18:5, s. 681-689
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Treatment guidelines for abdominal wound dehiscence (WD) are lacking. The primary aim of the study was to compare suture to mesh repair in WD patients concerning incisional hernia incidence. Secondary aims were to compare recurrent WD, morbidity, mortality and long-term abdominal wall complaints. A retrospective chart review of 46 consecutive patients operated for WD between January 2010 and August 2012 was conducted. Physical examination and a questionnaire enquiry were performed in January 2013. Six patients were treated by vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction (VAWCM) before definitive closure. Three patients died early resulting in 23 patients closed by suture and 20 by mesh repair. Five sutured, but no mesh repair patients had recurrent WD (p = 0.051) with a mortality of 60 %. Finally, 18 sutured and 21 mesh repair patients were eligible for follow-up. The incidence of incisional hernia was higher for the sutured patients (53 vs. 5 %, p = 0.002), while mesh repair patients had a higher short-term morbidity rate (76 vs. 28 %, p = 0.004). Abdominal wall complaints were rare in both groups. Suture of WD was afflicted with a high incidence of recurrent WD and incisional hernia formation. Mesh repair overcomes these problems at the cost of more wound complications. VAWCM seems to be an alternative for treating contaminated patients until definitive closure is possible. Long-term abdominal wall complaints are uncommon after WD treatment.
|
|
| 22. |
- Smeds, Staffan, et al.
(författare)
-
Chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair: a longitudinal self-assessment study
- 2010
-
Ingår i: HERNIA. - : Springer Science Business Media. - 1265-4906 .- 1248-9204. ; 14:3, s. 249-252
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim of the present study was to assess the variation of self-reported pain over a period of 2 years in three groups of patients with no, moderate and severe pain at 3 months after primary open inguinal hernia repair. In two cohorts of patients from 2004 (n = 272) and 2005 (n = 292) who had given a self-report of postoperative pain at 3 months, 79 randomly selected patients without pain (box visual analogue scale [VAS] level 10) and all patients with moderate (Box VAS level 7-9) and severe pain (Box VAS level 1-6), 91 and 9, respectively, were included in the case series. The self-assessments were repeated for all patients 1-1.5 and 2-2.5 years after surgery (November 2006). It was observed that moderate pain reappeared among the pain-free patients in 28 and 23% after 1-1.5 and 2-2.5 years, respectively. Of those patients with moderate pain at 3 months, 39 and 49% reported no pain at 1-1.5 and 2-2.5 years, respectively, after surgery. A worsening from moderate pain to severe pain was reported by 22% of patients after 1-1.5 years and by 15% of patients after 2-2.5 years. Hernia recurrence (n = 3) was observed only in patients with increased pain. All nine patients with severe pain at 3 months reported less pain, but only one was pain-free at 2-2.5 years after surgery. The study shows that a significant proportion of the patients developed pain later than 3 months after the operation. It further points to a difference in pain evolvement in patients with moderate pain and those with severe postoperative pain at 3 months. Pain can increase in intensity from moderate to severe, both with and without the presence of a clinical recurrence.
|
|
| 23. |
- Smeds, Staffan, et al.
(författare)
-
Influence of nerve identification and the resection of nerves at risk on postoperative pain in open inguinal hernia repair
- 2010
-
Ingår i: HERNIA. - : Springer Science Business Media. - 1265-4906 .- 1248-9204. ; 14:3, s. 265-270
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Surgical strategy regarding nerve identification and resection in relation to chronic postoperative pain remains controversial. A central question is whether nerves in the operation field, when identified, should be preserved or resected. In the present study, the hypotheses that the identification and consequent resection of nerves at risk have no influence on postoperative pain has been tested. A single-centre study was conducted in 525 patients undergoing Lichtenstein hernioplasty. One surgeon (364 operations, Group A) consequently resected nerves at risk for being injured and nine surgeons (161 operations, Group B) adhered to the general routine of nerve preservation. All cases were ambulatory surgery on anaesthetised patients and the groups were similar with regard to age, body mass index (BMI) and preoperative pain. Self-reported pain at 3 months was recorded on a 10-box visual analogue scale (VAS). The identification and resection of nerves were continuously registered. Statistical calculations were performed with Fishers exact test and ordinal logistic regression. There was no significant difference in the number of identified nerves in the two groups of patients (iliohypogastricus, P = 0.555; ilioinguinalis, P = 0.831; genital branch, P = 0.214). However, the number of resected nerves was significantly higher in Group A for the iliohypogastric nerve, P andlt; 0.001, but not for ilioinguinalis, P = 0.064, and genital branch, P = 0.362. Non-identification of the ilioinguinal nerve correlated to the highest level of self-reported postoperative pain at 3 months. Patients in Group A, who had nerves at risk resected from the operation field, reported significantly less postoperative pain at 3 months, P = 0.007. This register study confirms the importance of nerve identification. Nerve resection strategy with the consequent removal of nerves at risk gives a significantly better outcome in Lichtenstein hernioplasty.
|
|
