| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Pujia, R., et al.
(författare)
-
Liver Stiffness in Obese Hypothyroid Patients Taking Levothyroxine
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Medicina-Lithuania. - : MDPI AG. - 1010-660X. ; 58:7
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and Objectives: Thyroid dysfunction is associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, but its role in the progression of liver damage in obese patients remains unclear. In addition, several case reports have suggested the existence of a levothyroxine-induced liver injury, which has been poorly investigated. Our aim was to verify whether a difference in the prevalence of liver fibrosis exists in a population of obese individuals taking Levothyroxine. Materials and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study on a population of 137 obese individuals, of which 49 were on replacement therapy with Levothyroxine. We excluded those who had hypertriglyceridemia and diabetes mellitus. All participants underwent a liver stiffness assessment by transient elastography as well as biochemical measurements. In subjects with liver fibrosis, other cause of liver fibrosis were ruled out. Results: Participants taking Levothyroxine had a higher prevalence of liver fibrosis than those not taking Levothyroxine (30.6% vs. 2.3%; p < 0.001), and these results were obtained after we made an adjustment for age (Exp(B) = 18.9; 95% CI = 4.1-87.4; p < 0.001). The liver stiffness value differed significantly between groups (6.0 +/- 3.6 and 5.1 +/- 1.2, p = 0.033). Of those subjects taking Levothyroxine, there were no significant differences in the dose of medication (1.21 +/- 0.36 vs. 1.07 +/- 0.42; p = 0.240) and treatment duration (13.7 +/- 7.43 vs. 11.13 +/- 6.23; p = 0.380) between those with and without liver fibrosis. Conclusions: We found, for the first time, a greater prevalence of liver fibrosis in obese individuals taking Levothyroxine than in those not taking this medication. This finding needs to be confirmed by longitudinal population studies as well as by cellular studies.
|
|
| 3. |
- Andersen, Casper W., et al.
(författare)
-
OPTIMADE, an API for exchanging materials data
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Scientific Data. - : Nature Portfolio. - 2052-4463. ; 8:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Open Databases Integration for Materials Design (OPTIMADE) consortium has designed a universal application programming interface (API) to make materials databases accessible and interoperable. We outline the first stable release of the specification, v1.0, which is already supported by many leading databases and several software packages. We illustrate the advantages of the OPTIMADE API through worked examples on each of the public materials databases that support the full API specification.
|
|
| 4. |
- Leard, Lorriana E., et al.
(författare)
-
Consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: An update from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. - : Elsevier BV. - 1053-2498 .- 1557-3117. ; 40, s. 1349-1379
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Tens of thousands of patients with advanced lung diseases may be eligible to be considered as potential candidates for lung transplant around the world each year. The timing of referral, evaluation, determination of candidacy, and listing of candidates continues to pose challenges and even ethical dilemmas. To address these challenges, the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation appointed an international group of members to review the literature, to consider recent advances in the management of advanced lung diseases, and to update prior consensus documents on the selection of lung transplant candidates. The purpose of this updated consensus document is to assist providers throughout the world who are caring for patients with pulmonary disease to identify potential candidates for lung transplant, to optimize the timing of the referral of these patients to lung transplant centers, and to provide transplant centers with a framework for evaluating and selecting candidates. In addition to addressing general considerations and providing disease specific recommendations for referral and listing, this updated consensus document includes an ethical framework, a recognition of the variability in acceptance of risk between transplant centers, and establishes a system to account for how a combination of risk factors may be taken into consideration in candidate selection for lung transplantation.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
