| 1. |
- Householder, John Ethan, et al.
(författare)
-
One sixth of Amazonian tree diversity is dependent on river floodplains
- 2024
-
Ingår i: NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION. - 2397-334X. ; 8, s. 901-911
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Amazonia's floodplain system is the largest and most biodiverse on Earth. Although forests are crucial to the ecological integrity of floodplains, our understanding of their species composition and how this may differ from surrounding forest types is still far too limited, particularly as changing inundation regimes begin to reshape floodplain tree communities and the critical ecosystem functions they underpin. Here we address this gap by taking a spatially explicit look at Amazonia-wide patterns of tree-species turnover and ecological specialization of the region's floodplain forests. We show that the majority of Amazonian tree species can inhabit floodplains, and about a sixth of Amazonian tree diversity is ecologically specialized on floodplains. The degree of specialization in floodplain communities is driven by regional flood patterns, with the most compositionally differentiated floodplain forests located centrally within the fluvial network and contingent on the most extraordinary flood magnitudes regionally. Our results provide a spatially explicit view of ecological specialization of floodplain forest communities and expose the need for whole-basin hydrological integrity to protect the Amazon's tree diversity and its function.
|
|
| 2. |
- Luize, Bruno Garcia, et al.
(författare)
-
Geography and ecology shape the phylogenetic composition of Amazonian tree communities
- 2024
-
Ingår i: JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY. - 0305-0270 .- 1365-2699. ; 51:7, s. 1163-1184
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aim: Amazonia hosts more tree species from numerous evolutionary lineages, both young and ancient, than any other biogeographic region. Previous studies have shown that tree lineages colonized multiple edaphic environments and dispersed widely across Amazonia, leading to a hypothesis, which we test, that lineages should not be strongly associated with either geographic regions or edaphic forest types. Location: Amazonia. Taxon: Angiosperms (Magnoliids; Monocots; Eudicots). Methods: Data for the abundance of 5082 tree species in 1989 plots were combined with a mega-phylogeny. We applied evolutionary ordination to assess how phylogenetic composition varies across Amazonia. We used variation partitioning and Moran's eigenvector maps (MEM) to test and quantify the separate and joint contributions of spatial and environmental variables to explain the phylogenetic composition of plots. We tested the indicator value of lineages for geographic regions and edaphic forest types and mapped associations onto the phylogeny. Results: In the terra firme and v & aacute;rzea forest types, the phylogenetic composition varies by geographic region, but the igap & oacute; and white-sand forest types retain a unique evolutionary signature regardless of region. Overall, we find that soil chemistry, climate and topography explain 24% of the variation in phylogenetic composition, with 79% of that variation being spatially structured (R-2 = 19% overall for combined spatial/environmental effects). The phylogenetic composition also shows substantial spatial patterns not related to the environmental variables we quantified (R-2 = 28%). A greater number of lineages were significant indicators of geographic regions than forest types. Main Conclusion: Numerous tree lineages, including some ancient ones (>66 Ma), show strong associations with geographic regions and edaphic forest types of Amazonia. This shows that specialization in specific edaphic environments has played a long-standing role in the evolutionary assembly of Amazonian forests. Furthermore, many lineages, even those that have dispersed across Amazonia, dominate within a specific region, likely because of phylogenetically conserved niches for environmental conditions that are prevalent within regions.
|
|
| 3. |
- Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani, Sahar, et al.
(författare)
-
PCM4EU and PRIME-ROSE : Collaboration for implementation of precision cancer medicine in Europe
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Acta Oncologica. - 1651-226X .- 1651-226X. ; 63, s. 385-391
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: In the two European Union (EU)-funded projects, PCM4EU (Personalized Cancer Medicine for all EU citizens) and PRIME-ROSE (Precision Cancer Medicine Repurposing System Using Pragmatic Clinical Trials), we aim to facilitate implementation of precision cancer medicine (PCM) in Europe by leveraging the experience from ongoing national initiatives that have already been particularly successful. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PCM4EU and PRIME-ROSE gather 17 and 24 partners, respectively, from 19 European countries. The projects are based on a network of Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP)-like clinical trials that are currently ongoing or soon to start in 11 different countries, and with more trials expected to be established soon. The main aims of both the projects are to improve implementation pathways from molecular diagnostics to treatment, and reimbursement of diagnostics and tumour-tailored therapies to provide examples of best practices for PCM in Europe. RESULTS: PCM4EU and PRIME-ROSE were launched in January and July 2023, respectively. Educational materials, including a podcast series, are already available from the PCM4EU website (http://www.pcm4eu.eu). The first reports, including an overview of requirements for the reimbursement systems in participating countries and a guide on patient involvement, are expected to be published in 2024. CONCLUSION: European collaboration can facilitate the implementation of PCM and thereby provide affordable and equitable access to precision diagnostics and matched therapies for more patients. ble from the PCM4EU website (http://www.pcm4eu.eu). The first reports, including an overview of requirements for the reimbursement systems in participating countries and a guide on patient involvement, are expected to be published in 2024. CONCLUSION: European collaboration can facilitate the implementation of PCM and thereby provide affordable and equitable access to precision diagnostics and matched therapies for more patients.
|
|
| 4. |
- Caronna, Edoardo, et al.
(författare)
-
Redefining migraine prevention: early treatment with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies enhances response in the real world
- 2024
-
Ingår i: JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY. - 0022-3050 .- 1468-330X.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP MAbs) are approved and available treatments for migraine prevention. Patients do not respond alike and many countries have reimbursement policies, which hinder treatments to those who might respond. This study aimed to investigate clinical factors associated with good and excellent response to anti-CGRP MAbs at 6 months. Methods European multicentre, prospective, real-world study, including high-frequency episodic or chronic migraine (CM) patients treated since March 2018 with anti-CGRP MAbs. We defined good and excellent responses as >= 50% and >= 75% reduction in monthly headache days (MHD) at 6 months, respectively. Generalised mixed-effect regression models (GLMMs) were used to identify variables independently associated with treatment response. Results Of the 5818 included patients, 82.3% were females and the median age was 48.0 (40.0-55.0) years. At baseline, the median of MHD was 20.0 (14.0-28.0) days/months and 72.2% had a diagnosis of CM. At 6 months (n=4963), 56.5% (2804/4963) were good responders and 26.7% (1324/4963) were excellent responders. In the GLMM model, older age (1.08 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.15), p=0.016), the presence of unilateral pain (1.39 (95% CI 1.21 to 1.60), p<0.001), the absence of depression (0.840 (95% CI 0.731 to 0.966), p=0.014), less monthly migraine days (0.923 (95% CI 0.862 to 0.989), p=0.023) and lower Migraine Disability Assessment at baseline (0.874 (95% CI 0.819 to 0.932), p<0.001) were predictors of good response (AUC of 0.648 (95% CI 0.616 to 0.680)). These variables were also significant predictors of excellent response (AUC of 0.691 (95% CI 0.651 to 0.731)). Sex was not significant in the GLMM models. Conclusions This is the largest real-world study of migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP MAbs. It provides evidence that higher migraine frequency and greater disability at baseline reduce the likelihood of responding to anti-CGRP MAbs, informing physicians and policy-makers on the need for an earlier treatment in order to offer the best chance of treatment success.
|
|
| 5. |
- Taskén, Kjetil, et al.
(författare)
-
Single point of entry to the European precision cancer medicine trial network PRIME-ROSE
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Oncology. - : American Society of Clinical Oncology. - 1527-7755 .- 0732-183X. ; 42:16
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Over the last decades, there has been a surge in the development and approval of targeted drugs and immunotherapies for treating cancer patients, as seen by the 757 % increase in approvals by the FDA for new cancer treatments since 2000 (1). This has significantly impacted cancer care and contributed to improving overall survival in various cancer subgroups. However, access to these new treatments is constrained by the market access strategy of the patent-owning company and available knowledge of treatment effects. Only a few treatments have received pan-cancer approval from EMA or FDA, and most drugs receive market authorization per indication. As a result, there is a widening access gap between patients with different cancer types (2). Methods: Exploring the effect of biomarker-driven treatments in new cancer subtypes requires the ability to find patients with rare biomarkers. PRIME-ROSE is a European precision medicine network comprising 11 ongoing or soon-to-start national DRUP-like clinical trials testing registered drugs outside their current label (www.prime-rose.eu). Patients with relevant tumor biomarkers are identified and treated with matched drugs available in each trial’s drug portfolio. The ambition is to swiftly and systematically evaluate the effectiveness of approved precision cancer medicines in new indications through pragmatic trial designs and with RWE control cohorts, ensuring expansion into all relevant patient groups to maximize societal benefit. This is particularly relevant for rare cancers, which are enriched in precision medicine trials (3). Results: In PRIME-ROSE, the trials now share and aggregate data to build evidence faster and more effectively impact patient care by addressing key challenges in precision cancer medicine implementation (increasing the recruitment area to 71 million inhabitants). This will significantly reduce the time for filling treatment cohorts and contribute to closing the indication/drug-specific knowledge gap. In fact, several pharmaceutical companies have already shown their interest in and commitment to participating in PRIME-ROSE, as it offers the unique advantage of entering the trials in the network simultaneously (single point of entry) and with a floating allocation of treatment slots between trials, increasing efficiency in finding patients with specific biomarkers to fill treatment cohorts. Conclusions: A unified entry point to the PRIME-ROSE network is feasible and can facilitate building the knowledge base faster for label expansion and/or country-specific approvals/ reimbursement. National multi-stakeholder ecosystems that include pragmatic, RWE-controlled DRUP-like clinical trials may advance precision medicine implementation.
|
|
