| 1. |
- Ahlbäck, Anders, 1973-
(författare)
-
En klassiker som skaver litet
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Historisk Tidsskrift. - : Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS. - 0018-263X .- 1504-2944. ; 99:3, s. 233-238
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 2. |
- Rattenborg, Rune, 1983-
(författare)
-
Kristoffer Momrak : Midtøstens Metropoler
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Historisk Tidsskrift. - Bergen : Universitetsforlaget. - 0018-263X .- 1504-2944. ; 100:4, s. 353-356
-
Recension (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Berg, Anne, 1981-, et al.
(författare)
-
Redaktörerna [sic!] har ordet
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Historisk Tidskrift. - : Svenska Historiska Föreningen. - 0345-469X .- 2002-4827 .- 0018-263X .- 1504-2944. ; 143:2, s. 135-136
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 5. |
- Bortz, Olof
(författare)
-
Forskarna, nazismen och den vetenskapliga objektiviteten : USA, Storbritannien och Frankrike, 1935–1939
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Historisk Tidsskrift. - 0018-263X .- 1504-2944. ; 143:2, s. 169-196
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Focusing on different interpretations of the ideal of scholarly objectivity, this article examines books and reviews dealing with Nazism written by American, British, and French scholars between 1935 and 1939. After the rise of the Nazi regime in 1933, scholars in three of the Western democracies that later faced Germany in the Second World War sought to explain the character and goals of Nazi ideology and the Nazi state. Some already specialised in German history, others gravitated towards the topic because of political developments. Often, their research and reviews led them to reflect on scholarly objectivity, impartiality, and neutrality.One notable example was the American political scientist Frederick Schuman who visited Nazi Germany in 1933. Schuman argued, while claiming to strive for an honest, undistorted depiction, that Nazi ideology, since it demanded either rejection or acceptance, rendered impartiality and neutrality impossible. His American colleagues, mainly political scientists and historians, took him to task for being overly critical of a regime which in their view had positive aspects. Émigré scholars in the US and France such as Fritz Ermarth, Fritz Morstein Marx, and Harald Mankiewicz, who had been forced to flee the Third Reich, were expected to set their experiences aside, allowing Nazi authors to speak unchallenged. While Schuman was criticised for his approach, Ermarth, Morstein Marx, and Mankiewicz were lauded for a form of objectivity which implied refraining from critical comment.The reception of Henri Lichtenberger’s L’Allemagne nouvelle, first published in French in 1936 and in English translation the following year, is another case in point. Lichtenberger was one of the founding fathers of German studies in France and worked for French–German understanding during the 1930s. In his book, he went to great lengths not to criticize the Third Reich and its leadership. Although several scholars, especially in the US, praised Lichtenberger’s impartial approach there were also dissenting voices who took exception to his reticence. In 1938 and 1939, ever more scholars argued for the importance of taking sides in response to a state which in their view posed problems greater than the question of scholarly objectivity. In this context, the sociologist Aurel Kolnai’s indictment of Nazism, despite making no pretence to being dispassionate, seemed more attuned to the situation. The ideal of scholarly objectivity and impartiality proved not only its persistence in the scholarly encounter with Nazism, but also its inadequacy as a response to the challenge posed by the Third Reich. It was only when that regime appeared as an immediate threat to other countries that scholarly discourses changed.
|
|
| 6. |
- Engström, Alexander, 1985-
(författare)
-
Skogskris och resurskonflikt : Debatten om skogsödande i Sverige 1740–1820
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Historisk Tidsskrift. - : Svenska Historiska Föreningen. - 0018-263X .- 1504-2944 .- 0345-469X .- 2002-4827. ; 144:2, s. 199-223
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In the eighteenth century, Sweden saw a fierce, elite-driven debate in Kungl. Vetenskapsakademien (Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences) and Kungl. Patriotiska sällskapet (Royal Patriotic Society) about the country’s wood shortage. It was echoed in several strict forest ordinances, introduced primarily to safeguard the interests of the iron industry. The elite tended to blame the peasantry and their supposed ”skogsödande” or squandering of forestry resources. If the waste of timber and fuel could not be halted, there would be no end to the misery that would befall the country for generations to come; however, were sustainable forestry practices and responsible wood use to be adopted, in accordance with the elite’s proposals, then there would be no limit to Sweden’s prosperity and success.The various explanations of the waste of forestry resources intersected with contemporary cameralism, but also drew on the traditional elite arguments about resource management, making a clear distinction between progressive, moral, patriarchal elite rule and the backward practices of recalcitrant commoners – a distinction that centred on the discourses of threat and solution. It was believed the peasantry were guilty of forest degradation and thus it was their responsibility to remedy it. Any and all of the peasants’ practices, no matter how minor, were thought evidence of their poor forest management and wasteful use of wood. This gave the elite the opportunity to frame such practices as against the interests of the nation and even the peasantry. Good governance by the elite was essential for the preservation of the woodlands, as well as optimising wood use and replacing wood with wood-saving alternatives. Only then could Sweden’s forests be made to flourish again.The peasantry countered the elite’s arguments by portraying themselves as both professional and patriotic foresters, who possessed all the skills for sustainable forestry. They contended that the cause of forest degradation lay not with the peasantry, but with overzealous legislators and officials, regulations, trade barriers, levies, and overambitious infrastructure projects. As such, the peasantry argued that only through deregulation and land reform to benefit privately owned forests would the Swedish state be able to mitigate the threat of deforestation and save one of its most precious resources.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
| 11. |
|
|
| 12. |
- Monié-Nordin, Jonas, 1970-, et al.
(författare)
-
Kolonialt samlande i Sápmi
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Historisk Tidskrift. - 0345-469X .- 2002-4827 .- 0018-263X .- 1504-2944. ; 140:3, s. 529-542
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 13. |
- Olausson, Inger, et al.
(författare)
-
Från småskaligt och närodlat till en global handel : Hundra år av tillväxt och omvandling för svensk trädgårdsproduktion
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Historisk Tidsskrift. - : Svenska Historiska Föreningen. - 0018-263X .- 1504-2944. ; 141:2, s. 235-259
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- I denna uppsats beskrivs och förklaras huvuddragen av svensk trädgårdsproduktions utveckling i relief mot den svenska ekonomins utveckling, från sent 1800-taloch fram till 1970-talet. I industrialiseringens kölvatten skedde en omvandling ochkraftig tillväxt som fortgått sedan dess. Grönsaker, frukt och bär med mera tillfredsställde nya smakpreferenser. Handeln med trädgårdsprodukter ökade, bådeinom landet och genom import, och en ökande konkurrens drev på förändringar ibranschen.
|
|
| 14. |
|
|
| 15. |
- Wiell, Karolina, 1974-
(författare)
-
Hans Bonde, Sundhedsapostlen J.P. Müller: Band 1: Det kropsligt moderne gennembrud 1864–1904
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Historisk Tidsskrift. - : Svenska Historiska Föreningen. - 0018-263X .- 1504-2944. ; 40:4, s. 746-748
-
Recension (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- År 2020 utkom den danske idrottshistorikern Hans Bonde med ett omfattande verk om den danska gymnastik- och hälsoivraren Jörgen Peter Müller (1866–1938). Boken Sundhedsapostlen J.P. Müller: Det kropsligt moderne gennembrud 1864–1904, är den första delen av ett tvåbandsverk och recenseras i Historisk Tidskrift av Karolina Wiell. Hon har funnit att Bondes syfte med boken varit att att skriva in kroppens historia i det moderna genombrottets historia genom sin närstudie av J.P. Müllers liv. På så vis både introducerar Bonde begreppet ”gentlisme” (som en maskulin form av feminism) och lämnar ett bidrag till flertalet forskningsfält såsom sexologi, genus, idrott och hygien.
|
|
| 16. |
|
|
| 17. |
|
|
| 18. |
|
|
| 19. |
|
|
