| 1. |
- Larsson, M, et al.
(författare)
-
Continuous surgical multi-level extrapleural block for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a retrospective study assessing its efficacy as pain relief following lobectomy and wedge resection
- 2018
-
Ingår i: F1000Research. - : F1000 Research Ltd. - 2046-1402. ; 7, s. 1783-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) causes less postoperative pain than thoracotomy; however, adequate analgesia remains vital. As part of a multi-modal postoperative analgesia, a continuous surgeon-placed extrapleural block catheter is an option. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of a continuous extrapleural block as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen after VATS in general, and VATS lobectomy and wedge resection in particular. Methods: Case records for patients having undergone VATS surgery and been provided a multi-level continuous extrapleural block with an elastomeric pump infusing levobupivacaine 2.7 mg/ml at a rate of 5 ml/h during 2015 and 2016 were reviewed. Pain (Numeric Rating Scale) at rest and mobilisation as well as opioid requirement (daily, postoperative days 0-3, as well as accumulated) were analysed. Results: In all, 454 records were reviewed: 150 wedge resections, 264 lobectomies and 40 miscellaneous cases. At rest, pain was mild median NRS rated 3-3-1-1 for postoperative day (POD) 0 to 3, during movement, pain was rated moderate during POD 0 and 1 and mild the remaining days (median NRS 4-4-3-3 for POD 0-3). The proportion of patients exhibiting mild pain at rest increased from 55% on POD 0 to 81 % on POD 3. The percentage of patients experiencing severe pain at rest decreased from 15% to 6%. Median oxycodone consumption was 10 mg per day for POD 1-3. Pain after VATS wedge resection was significantly lower at POD 1 and 3 compared to pain after VATS lobectomy. Conclusion: We found a continuous surgeon-placed extrapleural catheter block to be a valuable and seemingly safe addition to our multimodal procedure specific analgesia after VATS. Whether the efficacy of the block can be improved by increasing local anaesthetic and/or adding adjuncts warrants further investigation.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Toller, W, et al.
(författare)
-
Preoperative and perioperative use of levosimendan in cardiac surgery: European expert opinion.
- 2015
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Cardiology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0167-5273 .- 1874-1754. ; 184, s. 323-336
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- In cardiac surgery, postoperative low cardiac output has been shown to correlate with increased rates of organ failure and mortality. Catecholamines have been the standard therapy for many years, although they carry substantial risk for adverse cardiac and systemic effects, and have been reported to be associated with increased mortality. On the other hand, the calcium sensitiser and potassium channel opener levosimendan has been shown to improve cardiac function with no imbalance in oxygen consumption, and to have protective effects in other organs. Numerous clinical trials have indicated favourable cardiac and non-cardiac effects of preoperative and perioperative administration of levosimendan. A panel of 27 experts from 18 countries has now reviewed the literature on the use of levosimendan in on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and in heart valve surgery. This panel discussed the published evidence in these various settings, and agreed to vote on a set of questions related to the cardioprotective effects of levosimendan when administered preoperatively, with the purpose of reaching a consensus on which patients could benefit from the preoperative use of levosimendan and in which kind of procedures, and at which doses and timing should levosimendan be administered. Here, we present a systematic review of the literature to report on the completed and ongoing studies on levosimendan, including the newly commenced LEVO-CTS phase III study (NCT02025621), and on the consensus reached on the recommendations proposed for the use of preoperative levosimendan.
|
|
