| 1. |
- Boguszewski, M. C. S., et al.
(author)
-
Safety of growth hormone replacement in survivors of cancer and intracranial and pituitary tumours: a consensus statement
- 2022
-
In: European Journal of Endocrinology. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0804-4643 .- 1479-683X. ; 186:6
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Growth hormone (GH) has been used for over 35 years, and its safety and efficacy has been studied extensively. Experimental studies showing the permissive role of GH/insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-I) in carcinogenesis have raised concerns regarding the safety of GH replacement in children and adults who have received treatment for cancer and those with intracranial and pituitary tumours. A consensus statement was produced to guide decision-making on GH replacement in children and adult survivors of cancer, in those treated for intracranial and pituitary tumours and in patients with increased cancer risk. With the support of the European Society of Endocrinology, the Growth Hormone Research Society convened a Workshop, where 55 international key opinion leaders representing 10 professional societies were invited to participate. This consensus statement utilized: (1) a critical review paper produced before the Workshop, (2) five plenary talks, (3) evidence-based comments from four breakout groups, and (4) discussions during report-back sessions. Current evidence reviewed from the proceedings from the Workshop does not support an association between GH replacement and primary tumour or cancer recurrence. The effect of GH replacement on secondary neoplasia risk is minor compared to host- and tumour treatment-related factors. There is no evidence for an association between GH replacement and increased mortality from cancer amongst GH-deficient childhood cancer survivors. Patients with pituitary tumour or craniopharyngioma remnants receiving GH replacement do not need to be treated or monitored differently than those not receiving GH. GH replacement might be considered in GH-deficient adult cancer survivors in remission after careful individual risk/benefit analysis. In children with cancer predisposition syndromes, GH treatment is generally contraindicated but may be considered cautiously in select patients.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Hokken-Koelega, A. C. S., et al.
(author)
-
International Consensus Guideline on Small for Gestational Age: Etiology and Management From Infancy to Early Adulthood
- 2023
-
In: Endocrine Reviews. - : The Endocrine Society. - 0163-769X .- 1945-7189. ; 44:3, s. 539-565
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- This International Consensus Guideline was developed by experts in the field of small for gestational age (SGA) of 10 pediatric endocrine societies worldwide. A consensus meeting was held and 1300 articles formed the basis for discussions. All experts voted about the strengths of the recommendations. The guideline gives new and clinically relevant insights into the etiology of short stature after SGA birth, including novel knowledge about (epi)genetic causes. Further, it presents long-term consequences of SGA birth and also reviews new treatment options, including treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) in addition to growth hormone (GH) treatment, as well as the metabolic and cardiovascular health of young adults born SGA after cessation of childhood GH treatment in comparison with appropriate control groups. To diagnose SGA, accurate anthropometry and use of national growth charts are recommended. Follow-up in early life is warranted and neurodevelopment evaluation in those at risk. Excessive postnatal weight gain should be avoided, as this is associated with an unfavorable cardiometabolic health profile in adulthood. Children born SGA with persistent short stature < -2.5 SDS at age 2 years or < -2 SDS at 3 to 4 years of age, should be referred for diagnostic workup. In case of dysmorphic features, major malformations, microcephaly, developmental delay, intellectual disability, and/or signs of skeletal dysplasia, genetic testing should be considered. Treatment with 0.033 to 0.067 mg GH/kg/day is recommended in case of persistent short stature at age of 3 to 4 years. Adding GnRHa treatment could be considered when short adult height is expected at pubertal onset. All young adults born SGA require counseling to adopt a healthy lifestyle.
|
|
| 4. |
- van Santen, Selveta S, et al.
(author)
-
Bariatric Surgery for Hypothalamic Obesity in Craniopharyngioma Patients: A Retrospective, Matched Case-Control Study.
- 2021
-
In: The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. - : The Endocrine Society. - 1945-7197 .- 0021-972X. ; 106:11
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Craniopharyngioma is a sellar tumor associated with high rates of pituitary deficiencies (~98%) and hypothalamic obesity (~50%).To determine the efficacy regarding long-term weight loss after bariatric surgery in obese craniopharyngioma patients with hypothalamic dysfunction.Retrospective case control study.Multicenter international study.Obese craniopharyngioma patients (N = 16; of which 12 women) with a history of bariatric surgery [12 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 4 sleeve gastrectomy; median age of 21 years (range 15-52), median follow-up 5.2 years (range 2.0-11.3)] and age/sex/surgery/BMI-matched obese controls (N = 155).Weight loss and obesity-related comorbidities up to 5 years after bariatric surgery were compared and changes in hormonal replacement therapy evaluated.Mean weight loss at 5-year follow-up was 22.0% (95% CI 16.1, 27.8) in patients versus 29.5% (28.0, 30.9) in controls (P = 0.02), which was less after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (22.7% [16.9, 28.5] vs. 32.0% [30.4, 33.6]; P = 0.003) but at a similar level after sleeve gastrectomy (21.7% [-1.8, 45.2] vs. 21.8% [18.2, 25.5]; P = 0.96). No major changes in endocrine replacement therapy were observed after surgery. One patient died (unknown cause). One patient had long-term absorptive problems.Obese patients with craniopharyngioma had a substantial mean weight loss of 22% at 5-year follow-up after bariatric surgery, independent of type of bariatric surgery procedure. Weight loss was lower than in obese controls after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Bariatric surgery appears effective and relatively safe in the treatment of obese craniopharyngioma patients.
|
|
| 5. |
- Boguszewski, M. C. S., et al.
(author)
-
Near-Adult Height After Growth Hormone Treatment in Children Born Prematurely-Data From KIGS
- 2020
-
In: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. - : The Endocrine Society. - 0021-972X .- 1945-7197. ; 105:7
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- CONTEXT: Children born prematurely have been treated with growth hormone (GH), and a significant improvement in height during the first years of treatment has been described. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of prematurity on near-adult height (NAH) after GH treatment. DESIGN: KIGS (Pfizer International Growth Database) was queried for children born preterm treated with GH. SETTING: KIGS database. PATIENTS: A total of 586 children short in stature born preterm with various GH status and with available gestational age (GA), birth weight, and NAH, all treated with GH. INTERVENTION: GH treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: NAH. RESULTS: Values were expressed as median. From the 586 children included, 482 born appropriate for GA (AGA; median age 8.26 years) and 104 born small for gestational age (SGA) (median age 8.54 years); 66.6% of preterm AGA had GH peak < 7 microg/L during a provocation test, whereas only 8.6% of preterm SGA. Change in height standard deviation scores (SDS) from GH start to NAH after 8.04 years of GH treatment was 1.82 in preterm AGA. Respective values were 7.08 years and 1.08 SDS for preterm SGA (P < 0.001); 57% of the variability of the growth response to NAH could be explained, and the distance to parental height was the strongest predictor. No significant changes in height SDS were observed from puberty start to NAH. No correlation was found with GA. GH treatment was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: GH treatment resulted in significant improvement in height in children born preterm, particularly during prepubertal years and for those with GH deficiency. The degree of prematurity did not influence the growth response.
|
|
| 6. |
- Boguszewski, M. C. S., et al.
(author)
-
Safety of growth hormone (GH) treatment in GH deficient children and adults treated for cancer and non-malignant intracranial tumors-a review of research and clinical practice
- 2021
-
In: Pituitary. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1386-341X .- 1573-7403. ; 24:5, s. 810-827
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Individuals surviving cancer and brain tumors may experience growth hormone (GH) deficiency as a result of tumor growth, surgical resection and/or radiotherapy involving the hypothalamic-pituitary region. Given the pro-mitogenic and anti-apoptotic properties of GH and insulin-like growth factor-I, the safety of GH replacement in this population has raised hypothetical safety concerns that have been debated for decades. Data from multicenter studies with extended follow-up have generally not found significant associations between GH replacement and cancer recurrence or mortality from cancer among childhood cancer survivors. Potential associations with secondary neoplasms, especially solid tumors, have been reported, although this risk appears to decline with longer follow-up. Data from survivors of pediatric or adult cancers who are treated with GH during adulthood are scarce, and the risk versus benefit profile of GH replacement of this population remains unclear. Studies pertaining to the safety of GH replacement in individuals treated for nonmalignant brain tumors, including craniopharyngioma and non-functioning pituitary adenoma, have generally been reassuring with regards to the risk of tumor recurrence. The present review offers a summary of the most current medical literature regarding GH treatment of patients who have survived cancer and brain tumors, with the emphasis on areas where active research is required and where consensus on clinical practice is lacking.
|
|
| 7. |
- Ho, Ken, et al.
(author)
-
Pituitary Neoplasm Nomenclature Workshop: Does Adenoma Stand the Test of Time?
- 2021
-
In: Journal of the Endocrine Society. - : The Endocrine Society. - 2472-1972. ; 5:3
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The WHO Classification of Endocrine Tumours designates pituitary neoplasms as adenomas. A proposed nomenclature change to pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) has been met with concern by some stakeholder groups. The Pituitary Society coordinated the Pituitary Neoplasm Nomenclature (PANOMEN) workshop to address the topic. Experts in pituitary developmental biology, pathology, neurosurgery, endocrinology, and oncology, including representatives nominated by the Endocrine Society, European Society of Endocrinology, European Neuroendocrine Association, Growth Hormone Research Society, and International Society of Pituitary Surgeons. Clinical epidemiology, disease phenotype, management, and prognosis of pituitary adenomas differ from that of most NETs. The vast majority of pituitary adenomas are benign and do not adversely impact life expectancy. A nomenclature change to PitNET does not address the main challenge of prognostic prediction, assigns an uncertain malignancy designation to benign pituitary adenomas, and may adversely affect patients. Due to pandemic restrictions, the workshop was conducted virtually, with audiovisual lectures and written précis on each topic provided to all participants. Feedback was collated and summarized by Content Chairs and discussed during a virtual writing meeting moderated by Session Chairs, which yielded an evidence-based draft document sent to all participants for review and approval. There is not yet a case for adopting the PitNET nomenclature. The PANOMEN Workshop recommends that the term adenoma be retained and that the topic be revisited as new evidence on pituitary neoplasm biology emerges.
|
|
