| 1. |
- Ennals, Richard, et al.
(författare)
-
Dialogue, Skill and Tacit Knowledge : Practical Knowledge and Corporate Social Responsibility
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Cultural Roots of Sustainable Management. - Switzerland : Springer. - 9783319282855 - 9783319282879 ; , s. 153-163
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This chapter explores work in the Skill and Technology tradition in Sweden, which links work and learning in a distinctive way, backed by a long intellectual tradition. There is a recognition of the limits of explicit knowledge, which is supported by computers. The key resource for organisations and individuals is Tacit Knowledge. Work in the field of practical knowledge has developed through cases, and reflection on Skill. Reflection and Dialogue provide the basis for a culture of Corporate Social Responsibility.
|
|
| 2. |
- Göranzon, Bo
(författare)
-
Introduction to The Last Dream by Joseph Weizenbaum
- 2019
-
Ingår i: AI & Society. - : Springer Nature. - 0951-5666 .- 1435-5655. ; 34:2, s. 177-194
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- What is ‘certainty’ in our everyday life and work? AI changing what it means to ‘be certain’. For example, when we engage with others and are doing our work, we make judgments in which we ‘trust our instinct’. Are we still able to do so if we engage with the ‘certainty’ of the machine? How is ‘being certain’ in ‘dialogue’ affected by our conceptions of what it means to be human in interaction with the ‘machine’, and consequent distinctions between body and mind? Descartes first likened the human body to a machine (albeit a machine created by God) and endowed reason as being a transcendent universal instrument. La Mettrie proposed that language and culture separates humans from ‘animals’. However, in Diderot’s writing, ‘knowledge’ is seen as embodied, coming from our senses and language, and where gesture and rhythm evolve in practice. For D’Alembert, human ‘instinct’ is a skill, a learnt practice, and Rousseau believes that human certainty is something that cannot be measured. These questionings of the dichotomies of body and mind and human and animal, that relate practice and knowledge, also question the place and meaning of ‘rules’ of engaged practice. For Wittgenstein, one learns to make judgments through personal experience, ‘rules in practice’, whereby language is necessarily culturally situated and embodied, and calculation and Judgement are part of each other.
|
|
