| 1. |
- Högmo, Anders, et al.
(author)
-
Base of tongue squamous cell carcinomas, outcome depending on treatment strategy and p16 status. A population-based study from the Swedish Head and Neck Cancer Register
- 2022
-
In: Acta Oncologica. - : Taylor & Francis. - 0284-186X .- 1651-226X. ; 61:4, s. 433-440
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: The base of tongue squamous cell carcinoma (BOTSCC) is mainly an HPV-related tumor. Radiotherapy (EBRT) ± concomitant chemotherapy (CT) is the backbone of the curatively intended treatment, with brachytherapy (BT) boost as an option. With four different treatment strategies in Sweden, a retrospective study based on the population-based Swedish Head and Neck Cancer Register (SweHNCR) was initiated.Material and methods: Data on tumors, treatment and outcomes in patients with BOTSCC treated between 2008 and 2014 were validated through medical records and updated as needed. Data on p16 status were updated or completed with immunohistochemical analysis of archived tumor material. Tumors were reclassified according to the UICC 8th edition.Results: Treatment was EBRT, EBRT + CT, EBRT + BT or EBRT + CT + BT in 151, 145, 82 and 167 patients respectively (n = 545). A p16 analysis was available in 414 cases; 338 were p16+ and 76 p16−. 5-year overall survival (OS) was 68% (95% CI: 64–72%), with76% and 37% for p16+ patients and p16− patients, respectively. An increase in OS was found with the addition of CT to EBRT for patients with p16+ tumors, stages II–III, but for patients with tumor stage I, p16+ (UICC 8) none of the treatment strategies was superior to EBRT alone.Conclusion: In the present retrospective population-based study of BOTSCC brachytherapy was found to be of no beneficial value in curatively intended treatment. An increase in survival was found for EBRT + CT compared to EBRT alone in patients with advanced cases, stages II and III (UICC 8), but none of the regimes was significantly superior to EBRT as a single treatment modality for stage I (UICC 8), provided there was p16 positivity in the tumor. In the small group of patients with p16− tumors, a poorer prognosis was found, but the small sample size did not allow any comparisons between different treatment strategies.
|
|
| 2. |
- Sterner, Freja, et al.
(author)
-
Carcinomas of the minor salivary glands of the oral cavity : a population-based study from the Swedish Head and Neck Cancer Register for 2008–2018
- 2023
-
In: Acta Oto-Laryngologica. - : Taylor & Francis. - 0001-6489 .- 1651-2251. ; 143:4, s. 346-351
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background and objectives: Carcinomas of the minor salivary glands are rare with a heterogeneous pathology. This study explored the demographics, histology, treatment and survival in the Swedish population over 11 years.Material and methods: Cases of salivary gland carcinomas in the oral cavity were extracted from the ‘Swedish Head and Neck Cancer Register’ (2008–2018). Statistical analyses with cross tabulation, age grouping, chi-square, the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank tests were performed.Results: Three hundred thirty cases were included (62% female; mean age 60 years; 83% were WHO Performance Status 0). The carcinomas were mostly stage I (57%), and the most common site was the palate with 165 tumours (50%). The most common histology was mucoepidermoid carcinoma (30%), followed by polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma (25%) and adenoid cystic carcinoma (24%). The distribution of histology differed between age groups. The five-year predicted overall survival rate was 83%. Most patients (89%) were treated with primary surgery.Conclusion and significance: The demographics, histology, and survival of minor salivary gland carcinomas in the oral cavity in the Swedish population correspond well with previously published material. The demographics and histology differ from carcinomas of the major salivary glands in the same population.
|
|
| 3. |
- Wennerberg, Johan, et al.
(author)
-
Results from a prospective, randomised study on (accelerated) preoperative versus (conventional) postoperative radiotherapy in treatment of patients with resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity : The ARTSCAN 2 study
- 2022
-
In: Radiotherapy and Oncology. - : Elsevier. - 0167-8140 .- 1879-0887. ; 166, s. 26-32
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background and purposeAn earlier prospective randomised multicentre study (ARTSCAN) in head and neck cancer patients that compared conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CF) with accelerated radiotherapy (AF) was inconclusive. In the subgroup of oral cavity squamous cell cancer (OCSCC) a large absolute, but not statistically significant, difference in local control was seen in favour of AF. This difference was more pronounced in resectable tumours. The finding raised the hypothesis that AF could be beneficial for OCSCC patients. In addition, the longstanding controversy on pre- or postoperative radiotherapy was addressed.Materials and methodsPatients with OCSCC, judged to withstand and likely benefit from combined therapy, were recruited. Subjects were randomised to either preoperative AF with 43 fractions given as a concomitant boost with two fractions/day to the tumour bearing volume to a total dose of 68 Gy in 4.5 weeks followed by surgery, or primary surgery with postoperative CF, total dose 60 or 66 Gy in 6–7 weeks. For patients whose tumours had high-risk features, 66 Gy and concomitant cisplatin was prescribed.Results250 patients were randomised. Median follow-up was 5 years for locoregional control (LRC) and 9 years for overall survival (OS). There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment arms regarding LRC and OS. LRC at five years was 73% (95% CI, 65–82) in preoperative AF and 78% (95% CI, 70–85) in postoperative CF.Toxicity was more pronounced in preoperative AF.ConclusionThis study does not support that AF prior to surgery improves outcome in oral cavity cancer compared with postoperative CF.
|
|
