| 1. |
- Yatabe, Yasushi, et al.
(författare)
-
Best Practices Recommendations for Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry in Lung Cancer
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Journal of Thoracic Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1556-0864 .- 1556-1380. ; 14:3, s. 377-407
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Since the 2015 WHO classification was introduced into clinical practice, immunohistochemistry (IHC) has figured prominently in lung cancer diagnosis. In addition to distinction of small cell versus non-small cell carcinoma, patients' treatment of choice is directly linked to histologic subtypes of non-small cell carcinoma, which pertains to IHC results, particularly for poorly differentiated tumors. The use of IHC has improved diagnostic accuracy in the classification of lung carcinoma, but the interpretation of IHC results remains challenging in some instances. Also, pathologists must be aware of many interpretation pitfalls, and the use of IHC should be efficient to spare the tissue for molecular testing. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Pathology Committee received questions on practical application and interpretation of IHC in lung cancer diagnosis. After discussions in several International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Pathology Committee meetings, the issues and caveats were summarized in terms of 11 key questions covering common and important diagnostic situations in a daily clinical practice with some relevant challenging queries. The questions cover topics such as the best IHC markers for distinguishing NSCLC subtypes, differences in thyroid transcription factor 1 clones, and the utility of IHC in diagnosing uncommon subtypes of lung cancer and distinguishing primary from metastatic tumors. This article provides answers and explanations for the key questions about the use of IHC in diagnosis of lung carcinoma, representing viewpoints of experts in thoracic pathology that should assist the community in the appropriate use of IHC in diagnostic pathology.
|
|
| 2. |
- Tsakonas, Georgios, et al.
(författare)
-
c-MET as a biomarker in patients with surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Lung Cancer. - : Elsevier. - 0169-5002 .- 1872-8332. ; 133, s. 69-74
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: c-MET protein overexpression has been proposed as a biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), albeit its role in the clinical setting has not been firmly established yet. Patients and methods: We designed a retrospective cohort study, consisting of 725 patients with surgically removed NSCLC. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was conducted in tissue microarrays (TMA) from lung tumors and healthy tissue. IHC staining was quantified using H-scores (range 0-300). Association between c-MET H-score and overall survival (OS) as well as progression-free survival (PFS) was explored. Results: c-MET H-score >= 20 had a significant positive impact on OS in the multivariate analysis in the whole study population, HR = 0.79 (95%CI: 0.64 - 0.97). The prognostic effect of c-MET H-score >= 20 was even stronger in patients who received adjuvant treatment with a HR = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.40 - 0.93). In the subgroup of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma patients with stage IIA-IIIB disease, the prognostic impact of c-MET was significant in the univariate analysis (HR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.43 - 0.83). Conclusion: c-MET H-score >= 20 is a positive prognostic biomarker for OS in early stage NSCLC. This benefit seems to be strongly correlated to adjuvant chemotherapy, therefore rendering c-MET H-score >= 20 a possible predictive biomarker for platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage NSCLC.
|
|
